rocker arm
#4
#6
http://www.catpep.com/catproducts/ro...nlessroker.asp
these are the same design as the comp cams, I run the 1.65 ratio NSAs in my LT1, they are great, and alot more economically friendly if you know what I mean
these are the same design as the comp cams, I run the 1.65 ratio NSAs in my LT1, they are great, and alot more economically friendly if you know what I mean
Trending Topics
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
I wish I knew if the Crane Gold 1.6's SA (P# 10759-16) would be fine for a stock motor (see sig). I get so many different opinions on them. They're fine, they suck, they're fine, they are ***** :\
The reason I'm so questionative, is because I own a new, unused set of them. Just looking at them new, they're pretty
The reason I'm so questionative, is because I own a new, unused set of them. Just looking at them new, they're pretty
#15
#17
I can almost gurantee that your promags are noisy compared to stock. Mine arent obnoxious loud, but if you put your head next to the valve cover you can hear them clicking or whatever you want to call it.
#18
mr king, I wasn't comparing them at all to the sound of a stock rocker. I was commenting on the fact that quite a few people say the promags sound like a sewing machine, from afar. Like I stated, the set i've been running for over 2yrs now even at 1/4 Turn preload, are very quiet Must be that fancy oil I run..
#19
I wish I knew if the Crane Gold 1.6's SA (P# 10759-16) would be fine for a stock motor (see sig). I get so many different opinions on them. They're fine, they suck, they're fine, they are ***** :\
The reason I'm so questionative, is because I own a new, unused set of them. Just looking at them new, they're pretty
The reason I'm so questionative, is because I own a new, unused set of them. Just looking at them new, they're pretty
I been running mine a while and they work fine for me no probs to report