LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Better or worse gas mileage with Lts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2007 | 01:29 PM
  #1  
Huntr1117's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Tx
Default Better or worse gas mileage with Lts

I'll be putting on my Jethot Lts / no cats, on Thursay and I was wondering if I'll be getting better gas mileage or worse?
Old 10-29-2007 | 01:50 PM
  #2  
mean_greenZ's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Default

i say better! motor isnt having to work as hard to push the exhaust out and is able to pull in more air therefore making it more efficient.
Old 10-29-2007 | 01:54 PM
  #3  
mean_greenZ's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Default

actually when you first drive the car for a while you will get crappy gas mileage cause you will not want to keep your foot out of it!
Old 10-29-2007 | 02:08 PM
  #4  
Huntr1117's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by mean_greenZ
actually when you first drive the car for a while you will get crappy gas mileage cause you will not want to keep your foot out of it!
I was pretty sure that was going to happen, cause the way I drive anyway.
Old 10-29-2007 | 02:35 PM
  #5  
LT1Falcon's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, West Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by mean_greenZ
i say better! motor isnt having to work as hard to push the exhaust out and is able to pull in more air therefore making it more efficient.
im not saying your gonna get better or worse, but how does pulling more air through and engine make it more effiecient? for every 14.7 parts of air you pull through the motor you are theoretically supposed to have one part of fuel to go with it. the way i look at this matter (which isnt correct in the real world) is that it takes a certain amount of energe (horsepower) to move your car down the road. if you are making more power at cruising rpm due to a modification (lts), then you shouldnt have to press the pedal down as far to make the needed power.
Old 10-29-2007 | 02:41 PM
  #6  
Jditlfm's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Brockport NY
Default

i got better but i got a tune at the same time so that might have helped
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:02 PM
  #7  
transamws6_97's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Originally Posted by LT1Falcon
im not saying your gonna get better or worse, but how does pulling more air through and engine make it more effiecient? for every 14.7 parts of air you pull through the motor you are theoretically supposed to have one part of fuel to go with it. the way i look at this matter (which isnt correct in the real world) is that it takes a certain amount of energe (horsepower) to move your car down the road. if you are making more power at cruising rpm due to a modification (lts), then you shouldnt have to press the pedal down as far to make the needed power.
well when you get a good intake filter or buy an intake why does that improve your gas mileage? So your saying if i have a crappy intake itll let less air in which will give me better gas mileage...i think not
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:18 PM
  #8  
projekt70chevelle's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Default

I think he's getting at the fact that the O2's are suppossed to adjust the a/f ratio accordingly, so more air would cause more fuel to be needed. But if the ecu took care of that properly we wouldnt need to tune our cars....they would do it themselves. I think that from the factory the cars run a little rich, so adding more air (via cai or better filter) the car runs a little more lean so less fuel is used...

And the whole more power less pedal less gas theory, well you wouldn have to push the pedal down as far to get it going, but since everything in vehicles are set up through gears the engine will still be turning the same rpm's at the same speed. And then again if your producing enough power to make a difference, then you're already using more fuel anyways because of the tune used to produce that power.

I was thinkin about this the other day and these are the conclusions i came to.... not sure how accurate that is.

Last edited by projekt70chevelle; 10-29-2007 at 04:29 PM.
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:22 PM
  #9  
donkey mule's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: Panama City Florida
Default

Less restriction = more HP and gass mileage. Is it easier to use a coffee stir or a straw to drink with? A tune is need with the LT'S though.
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:27 PM
  #10  
r.serio's Avatar
Staging Lane

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by donkey mule
Less restriction = more HP and gass mileage. Is it easier to use a coffee stir or a straw to drink with? A tune is need with the LT'S though.
Like stated above. Get a dyno tune or send your PCM out to be tuned. I picked up a spare just for this same reason. No waiting
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:30 PM
  #11  
projekt70chevelle's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by donkey mule
Less restriction = more HP and gass mileage. Is it easier to use a coffee stir or a straw to drink with? A tune is need with the LT'S though.
Very true. But once you get so much air in there you need a tune to add more gas. Hence people getting bigger injectors with higher hp applications. You usually end up running lean with cai and Lt's so you need the tune to add more fuel which inturn you end up with worse gas mileage (maybe not noticeble but it will drop).
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:31 PM
  #12  
Huntr1117's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Tx
Default

I know I need a tune but I'm holding off on that till I build the spair motor I have. The headers have AIR and EGR connections so I'm going to keep those for now and I have O2 sims for the rear O2 sensors. I shouldn't be throwing any codes with that setup right? I'm sure that without a tune I'm not going to see the full gains with Lts but there should be a significant difference right?
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:33 PM
  #13  
Huntr1117's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Tx
Default

Oh and I also have a spair PCM so that if I need to I can send it in
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:35 PM
  #14  
projekt70chevelle's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Default

You don't NEED a tune to run the Lt's, ive been doin it for months with no problems (i've been waitin to get the last parts for my cam swap, then its off to the dyno i go). But to get the best power you will always need a tune, no matter what you do to the engine. Deff. noticed a difference though, car seemed to run smoother than when i bought the thing and top end picks up some.
Old 10-29-2007 | 04:05 PM
  #15  
LiENUS's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Default

Better gas mileage because there is less restriction against the piston to push the air out the exhaust.
Old 10-30-2007 | 06:10 AM
  #16  
LT1Falcon's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, West Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by LiENUS
Better gas mileage because there is less restriction against the piston to push the air out the exhaust.
never thought of that, could be right but i doubt it would make enough difference to see a change in mpg
Old 10-30-2007 | 06:45 AM
  #17  
z_speedfreak's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 0
From: limbo
Default

...if hes ditching the cats wont he loose a couple MPG's?
Old 10-30-2007 | 04:12 PM
  #18  
Huntr1117's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by z_speedfreak
...if hes ditching the cats wont he loose a couple MPG's?
I thought that might make it better cause there's less restriction?
Old 10-30-2007 | 05:20 PM
  #19  
ThoR294's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 3
From: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Default

cats != gas mileage

he'll just bomb emissions
Old 10-30-2007 | 11:02 PM
  #20  
bama01's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

You have a sports car/muscle car mpg are irrelevant unless it's your daily driver.


Quick Reply: Better or worse gas mileage with Lts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.