LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

sa vs nsa rockkers for a daily driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2007 | 10:35 PM
  #21  
SincalT/A's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 1
From: Currently In suspense.
Default

Just curious how are we coming up fwhp or rwhp calculation to decide on which rocker to use?

btw. Lobe design/ramp rate,spring pressure and rpm have more to do with rocker stud deflection than anything else.
Old 11-18-2007 | 03:30 PM
  #22  
96lt1m6's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 2
From: LA$ VEGA$
Default

the deflection of a regular stud is greater when more rpm is used or a larger cam.
i may not have worded my statement clearly but i saw proof on the engine dyno,my buddies 434 gain HP&TQ from removing 7/16 1.6 rockers and going to 1.6 jesel shaft mounts.



Quick Reply: sa vs nsa rockkers for a daily driver



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 AM.