LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Bad MPG's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #1  
WS6_Suicide_Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Foothill Ranch, CA
Question Bad MPG's

Alright I didn't buy my car to get great MPG's, but when I get 16.5 mpg with 70% freeway driving, I think we have an issue. I just recently SeaFoamed the car which netted me a little bit over 1mpg better.

EDIT: mod's in sig

Anyone have any suggestions on what i should do? or what any problem it could be? Ill be changing the fuel filter, and spark plugs soon. Should i be looking for anything else.

Last edited by WS6_Suicide_Machine; May 28, 2008 at 11:51 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 12:28 AM
  #2  
Runamuck's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Default

air filter, spark plugs, wires... all can do 1+ mpg incriments USUALLY.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #3  
YoungGunLs1's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: SW Florida
Default

What kind of car is it, I see a Impala in your sig, but it says ^^not my car^^..

Also, if it is an F-body, is it an A4 or M6?

Ho many miles on the car? Plugs and wires would be good like you said you are already going to be doing. Simple things like making sure the air filter is clean, you are using the correct fuel (91+ octane), Tire Pressure (I find 35-37Psi results in better mileage than say 30-32psi) etc.. will all be things to consider as well.

If you have covered all of that I guess I am not sure where else to look, and will have to wait for someone else to chime in here.

But it would be good to know what kind of car you have as well.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 12:35 AM
  #4  
WS6_Suicide_Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Foothill Ranch, CA
Default

Its a 95 Impala SS. 143,XXX miles. And im only doing 87 Octane, and ima have to check me Tire PSI

and the car in the Video isnt mine.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 01:58 AM
  #5  
Dadic 78's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Default

Driving habits can have a lot to do with fuel economy too. I can get 180KM to a tank of fuel with my LT1, or I can get 325KM depending on how I drive. keep your foot at ease when accelerating, shift at lower RPM's and just don't drive the s**t out of it, and you'll see mileage gains.
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #6  
WS6_Suicide_Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Foothill Ranch, CA
Default

Honestly i drive pretty conservatively. Thats why im thinking theres something wrong. im getting about the same freeway mileage as street.
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #7  
YoungGunLs1's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: SW Florida
Default

Well I am not sure about the Impala's LT1, but for us F-body guys we are supposed to use 91+ octane fuel, and I would assume the same for your car. The fact that you are using 87 will hurt mileage too, so in the end saving 20cents a gallon by using the cheap gas isn't really saving anything, as with 91+ octane fuel you will see better milleage.

Back when I had my first LT1 in Highschool I tried using regular 87 gas several times, and my mileage dropped at least 3mpg, then when going back to using the right fuel my mileage went back to where it was supposed to be.

Also, gasoline brand makes a difference! I have testing with different brand Gasolines, and the biggest difference I have seen was when for about 3 months straight I used to use Walmarts gas at their Murphy stations 92 octane. NEVER was able to get over 23-24mpg no matter what I did on the highway. I decided to try a different brand and started filling at Sinclair 92 octane. First Tank on a highway trip I got 29mpg, and averaged 27-29mpg on all other highway trips from there on out. Because of that, I have NEVER put Murphy fuel in my car ever again.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 11:48 AM
  #8  
WS6_Suicide_Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Foothill Ranch, CA
Default

well after the change out of the plugs, i noticed a difference. Soon ill be doing a CAI, new o2 sensors, and clean the MAF.

gonna try do a full comparison on 91+ next time. see what happens, because from what ive been told impalas/9c1 caprices only need 87+
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-1

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-5

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-8

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 28, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #9  
landstuhltaylor's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 46
From: CBUS
Default

I was going to suggest new O2s as well. I remember seeing somewhere that certain brands of gasoline make slightly more power than others on the dyno and by the same token would get better mileage. I believe Shell Mobile and Sunoco were among the best which is why I use only Sunoco here (also the cheapest locally).
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #10  
djjab57's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by YoungGunLs1
Well I am not sure about the Impala's LT1, but for us F-body guys we are supposed to use 91+ octane fuel, and I would assume the same for your car. The fact that you are using 87 will hurt mileage too, so in the end saving 20cents a gallon by using the cheap gas isn't really saving anything, as with 91+ octane fuel you will see better milleage.

Back when I had my first LT1 in Highschool I tried using regular 87 gas several times, and my mileage dropped at least 3mpg, then when going back to using the right fuel my mileage went back to where it was supposed to be.

Also, gasoline brand makes a difference! I have testing with different brand Gasolines, and the biggest difference I have seen was when for about 3 months straight I used to use Walmarts gas at their Murphy stations 92 octane. NEVER was able to get over 23-24mpg no matter what I did on the highway. I decided to try a different brand and started filling at Sinclair 92 octane. First Tank on a highway trip I got 29mpg, and averaged 27-29mpg on all other highway trips from there on out. Because of that, I have NEVER put Murphy fuel in my car ever again.
x2 you should never run the cheap stuff in it you will get bad gas milage and a car that runs like **** I only tried that once
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #11  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

Is it just me, or does his Dyno numbers (unless those aren't his too) seem WAYYY too low for a LT1? Baby LT1 on accident maybe? :S

I run 87, but I love to drive fas :\ So I can't input my mpg.

Be crazy, mod in an M6 with 3.42s and you'll get really good gas mileage! If you live outside of Ethenol mixed gas (not E85, but Midwest states have 10% mixed at normal pump) you'll get great gas mileage. Buddy in his vette (much lighter, I know) got 32mpg highway coming back from Oregon (to Minnesota).
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #12  
06 SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: LITH, IL.
Default

my LT1 Caprice (also a '95) would run around 18 in town and 23 highway. It has 100K MORE miles than your Impala. Your power is about right, stock ones run about 215, but your torque is waaaay low. Should be seeing around 290 lb-ft at the wheels. I had trouble with the passenger side cat clogging and knocking my mileage down before it totally locked up on me (in hindsight, probably took 10K miles). Also, my Caprice is running 3.73 gears (vs your 3.08) and a 2800 stall. You have a mechanical problem someplace. I would check your exhaust first.

Also, the iron headed LT1's all had the 191/196 111 cam and are designed to run on 87 Octane.

There is exactly zero chemical energy differences between the different Octane fuels. No difference in flame propogation speed, Only think different is the higher Octane will take a higher temp to light off. If anyone was getting worse or better mileage, and was not having timing pulled due to knock, it had nothing to do with the rating of the fuel.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #13  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

I totally forgot the B-Bodies have a lighter cam. Would explain the power diff, BUT on the flip side the iron head flows better.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:03 PM
  #14  
WS6_Suicide_Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Foothill Ranch, CA
Default

More good advise thanks fellas. I know my cat's are due for a replacement. im pretty sure there both blow. ill get a whole new system with the next paycheck then.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 08:19 PM
  #15  
tspence45's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 1
From: Monmouth, Illinois
Default

Definately switch to 91+ octane. I run 93 all the time. But, last week I decided to try 89 (10% ethanol). Usually I get somewhere around 175 miles, when the gauge is at half, with a heavy foot, on 93. With 89, my gauge was at half, with just 125 miles. And that was fairly easy driving. Not to mention, it was running like crap with the 89. I've never really factored up my MPG, so I don't know the difference. But, it seems like quite a bit. Plus, I can't really factor it up, by just saying half. Because the first half always seems to go alot quicker than the 2nd. The damn gauge is never right.
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 10:58 PM
  #16  
WS6_Suicide_Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Foothill Ranch, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 06 SS
my LT1 Caprice (also a '95) would run around 18 in town and 23 highway. It has 100K MORE miles than your Impala. Your power is about right, stock ones run about 215, but your torque is waaaay low. Should be seeing around 290 lb-ft at the wheels. I had trouble with the passenger side cat clogging and knocking my mileage down before it totally locked up on me (in hindsight, probably took 10K miles). Also, my Caprice is running 3.73 gears (vs your 3.08) and a 2800 stall. You have a mechanical problem someplace. I would check your exhaust first.

Also, the iron headed LT1's all had the 191/196 111 cam and are designed to run on 87 Octane.

There is exactly zero chemical energy differences between the different Octane fuels. No difference in flame propogation speed, Only think different is the higher Octane will take a higher temp to light off. If anyone was getting worse or better mileage, and was not having timing pulled due to knock, it had nothing to do with the rating of the fuel.
When it came to the cat's issue did you buy a direct replacement cat from magnaflow/catco? or......?
Reply
Old May 28, 2008 | 11:52 PM
  #17  
ThoR294's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 4
From: Ringoes/Flemington, New Jersey
Default

87 octane if u like pre-ignition
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 09:02 AM
  #18  
transamsam98's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 878
Likes: 1
From: calvert county
Default

when do you need to go toemissions again? why not just delet your cats? but if you insist on getiing cat I like my magnaflo cat but I also have a 95 z28 so fitmit may be different.
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 10:19 AM
  #19  
WS6_Suicide_Machine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Foothill Ranch, CA
Default

I dont have to do emissions till 2012, but this is Orange County, CA. If i get pulled for what ever reason, they know if you have gutted cats or not.
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 05:30 PM
  #20  
06 SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: LITH, IL.
Default

Originally Posted by WS6_Suicide_Machine
When it came to the cat's issue did you buy a direct replacement cat from magnaflow/catco? or......?
Parked it. I believe I cracked a piston or rod when the exhaust clogged up. It would start and idle, but it didn't like it!

A shame too, just replaced the original tranny with a pretty stout one about 3K miles before it died. Tires/brakes under 2K miles, etc. Hard to justify spending the coin to replace the engine and having twice in the car than it would be worth...

Again to those throwing in their 2 cents about running the higher Octane; The Fe head LT1's DON'T need it with the stock cam and programming!!!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 PM.

story-0
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-1
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-2
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-3
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-5
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-8
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-9
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE