LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Why so slow?

Old May 20, 2008 | 10:37 AM
  #21  
BattleShip's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: I moved to over there
Default

Originally Posted by Michigan Skip
Stock tuning has these cars running rich at that rpm , that's why I leaned them out. I was seeing FALSE knock at that rpm also so that's why I took out the retard in the PCM. When I removed those things, I picked up 2 tenths. I also forgot to mention I have a Mallory 685 box.
How did you verify it is false knock? You often pick up power leaning a motor out, BUT lean motors seldom last long. I often believe it is false knock like an LT1 almost always knocka ~4000 rpm.

I leave the knock sensors in with open headers, twin turbo's, roller rockers I have never had to tune around a false knock. I know it is tempting but it is also expensive if the engine does knock.

I don't use LT4 km either, my $.02 enable the knock sensors.

Good luck
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #22  
Michigan Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

OK, I don't feel so bad then. I do think I have a problem with the tranny though, on that 13.12 run, I had an 8.29 eigth mile ET which converts to a 12.94 quarter mile ET using this

http://www.empirenet.com/pkelley2/eight-to-quarter.htm

So I'm thinking maybe It quits pulling somewhere down track.
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:42 AM
  #23  
BattleShip's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: I moved to over there
Default

How rich was your tune? How did you determine you are rich?

The formula I was given is

1/8 * 1.5832 = 1/4 is 13.12 for your track time

Which is dead on your number. Therefore, I do not see a problem from the time with your transmission. And if you want to know why there are differences in calculators here is a read

http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-hp-et-mph.htm

Last edited by BattleShip; May 20, 2008 at 10:51 AM.
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #24  
Michigan Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by BattleShip
How did you verify it is false knock? You often pick up power leaning a motor out, BUT lean motors seldom last long. I often believe it is false knock like an LT1 almost always knocka ~4000 rpm.

I leave the knock sensors in with open headers, twin turbo's, roller rockers I have never had to tune around a false knock. I know it is tempting but it is also expensive if the engine does knock.

I don't use LT4 km either, my $.02 enable the knock sensors.

Good luck
If you check the stock tune on an LT1,( at least the two I have) you'll find that when running in PE mode, that the PCM is fueling for a target AFR of 11.80-11.99, OR 11.08-11.95( Depending on wwhether you're using Jody Shapiro's or Andrew Mattei's formula) in the 4800-5600 rpm range. I leaned the AFR out back to 12.6 in that rpm range.
I verified that it was false, by running Torco Accelerator mixed at 104 octane, plus studying numerous Datamaster logs plus pulling the plugs and checking them. Hope that explained my reasoning for what I did
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #25  
BattleShip's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: I moved to over there
Default

Originally Posted by Michigan Skip
I leaned the AFR out back to 12.6 in that rpm range... Hope that explained my reasoning for what I did
My question is how did you determine and then verify the AFR is 12.6?

Last edited by BattleShip; May 20, 2008 at 11:01 AM.
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 11:03 AM
  #26  
Michigan Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by BattleShip
My question was how did you determine and then verify the AFR is 12.6?
That's a fair enough question. I have an excel spreadsheet that I use to calculate the numbers I need to plug into the AFR tables to get the AFR I'd like to have, then I use this little gadget

http://www.widebandcommander.com/

Surprisingly enough, the logged AFR is really close to what the PCM is commanded from the tables.
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #27  
Michigan Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by BattleShip
How rich was your tune? How did you determine you are rich?

The formula I was given is

1/8 * 1.5832 = 1/4 is 13.12 for your track time

Which is dead on your number. Therefore, I do not see a problem from the time with your transmission. And if you want to know why there are differences in calculators here is a read

http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-hp-et-mph.htm
Yeah, the calculators I've found use 1/8th * 1.56, so I guess maybe my tranny is ok. That's good
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #28  
BattleShip's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: I moved to over there
Default

Originally Posted by Michigan Skip
That's a fair enough question. I have an excel spreadsheet that I use to calculate the numbers I need to plug into the AFR tables to get the AFR I'd like to have, then I use this little gadget

http://www.widebandcommander.com/

Surprisingly enough, the logged AFR is really close to what the PCM is commanded from the tables.
I have had similiar experiences it is amazing how well this stock system works. I didn't want to explain to much because then your answer might have been biased. I do similiar, do you find your narrowband O2's are stable ie read consistent mv compared to your wideband?

What RPM are you trapping at? Since I read you don't shift into fourth, there is a technique I always wanted to try, but never had the need. With a 'good' torque convertor and transgo transmission kit you can lock the torque convertor in any gear (I don't have tuner cat here but I think 2, 3 and 4 might be just 3 and 4) at WOT.

I have NEVER tried it, BUT in your case it could give you say a 200 - 300 RPM 'upshift' to lunge your car at the end of 1/4 mile. I talked to a guy at a drag strip in Florida a couple years ago that used it and claimed it helped him and as I recall he claimed to do it in 2 and 3, but since it has been so long I can't be sure.

Might be worth looking into if your RPMs are above your sweet spot.

Good luck
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-3

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-7

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

 Brett Foote
story-9

10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 20, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #29  
Michigan Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by BattleShip
I have had similiar experiences it is amazing how well this stock system works. I didn't want to explain to much because then your answer might have been biased. I do similiar, do you find your narrowband O2's are stable ie read consistent mv compared to your wideband?

What RPM are you trapping at? Since I read you don't shift into fourth, there is a technique I always wanted to try, but never had the need. With a 'good' torque convertor and transgo transmission kit you can lock the torque convertor in any gear (I don't have tuner cat here but I think 2, 3 and 4 might be just 3 and 4) at WOT.

I have NEVER tried it, BUT in your case it could give you say a 200 - 300 RPM 'upshift' to lunge your car at the end of 1/4 mile. I talked to a guy at a drag strip in Florida a couple years ago that used it and claimed it helped him and as I recall he claimed to do it in 2 and 3, but since it has been so long I can't be sure.

Might be worth looking into if your RPMs are above your sweet spot.

Good luck
I'll get back to ya, I have to go earn some money. Good talking to someone who isn't cut/paste opinionated.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 01:42 AM
  #30  
Michigan Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

I lost a lot of logs when my hard drive crashed last winter. I went back to look and can't find them. I did log about 30 minutes of highway driving with Datamaster and my wide band though last saturday. Part throttle driving logs show my narrow band sensors toggling red/green/red/green and between 125 and 135 on the short terms and the O2's running between 250- and 850 both sides. The wideband toggles back and forth between 14.5 and 15.0 just not as fast as the oem sensors do. I will say though that running WOT, as I understand how the GM PCM works, the PCM goes into a "sort of" open loop mode where it used the PE tables to determine fueling and not the O2 sensors. I will say, that I do remember some of my WOT logs with Datamaster showed the O2's showed somewhere around 800-900 mv at wide open throttle. Keep in mind that these o2 sensors have about 60K miles on them. But to answer your question, it looks like they may be following each other. The narrow bands swing between their full range and the wideband is toggling in a narrow range of AFR that would seem to match that of the narrow bands.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #31  
Michigan Skip's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by BattleShip
I have had similiar experiences it is amazing how well this stock system works. I didn't want to explain to much because then your answer might have been biased. I do similiar, do you find your narrowband O2's are stable ie read consistent mv compared to your wideband?

What RPM are you trapping at? Since I read you don't shift into fourth, there is a technique I always wanted to try, but never had the need. With a 'good' torque convertor and transgo transmission kit you can lock the torque convertor in any gear (I don't have tuner cat here but I think 2, 3 and 4 might be just 3 and 4) at WOT.

I have NEVER tried it, BUT in your case it could give you say a 200 - 300 RPM 'upshift' to lunge your car at the end of 1/4 mile. I talked to a guy at a drag strip in Florida a couple years ago that used it and claimed it helped him and as I recall he claimed to do it in 2 and 3, but since it has been so long I can't be sure.

Might be worth looking into if your RPMs are above your sweet spot.

Good luck
I know a few guys that do lock the converter like you say, I haven't gotten around to that just yet as I'm still not fully up to speed on the trans tables yet. All I've done is do away with the "limp home" scenario, and adjusted the shift points.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #32  
BattleShip's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: I moved to over there
Default

The wideband toggles back and forth between 14.5 and 15.0 just not as fast as the oem sensors do.
My experience has been similiar right down to the wideband being slower. I think datamaster is a steal and it has paid for itself in gas savings and finding problems many times over as well as knowing more what is occurring.

I will say though that running WOT, as I understand how the GM PCM works, the PCM goes into a "sort of" open loop mode where it used the PE tables to determine fueling and not the O2 sensors.
Correct you can use this data from O2 to focus on rpm range that has a problem. usually within an RPM range fueling is 'stable'. GM does good work I would love every 100 RPM but probably would change nothing simply make it more complex.

I will say, that I do remember some of my WOT logs with Datamaster showed the O2's showed somewhere around 800-900 mv at wide open throttle.
Yes wot should be ~880 NA boosted >920+ if your O2's are ok. There have always been disputes on whether they can be trusted...better to use wideband but that is in a perfect world. I still trust the O2 to indicate a problem, and in boosted we tend to run rich anyway since we lose hp for being rich but not much. NA is different story

Keep in mind that these o2 sensors have about 60K miles on them. But to answer your question, it looks like they may be following each other.
That has been my experience. I have old O2s and they are fine for even wot. My tow vehicle is a Roadmaster with 9 psi it pulls like a train towing and scoots for the weight.

The narrow bands swing between their full range and the wideband is toggling in a narrow range of AFR that would seem to match that of the narrow bands.
Well nice chatting I am worn out from a few on here..I had heard it was better but that is life. I am amazed there isn't more policing of the obvious I think, I feel, I believe non sense where people claim 20 from a tune, 10 from this 20 from that and then you find they have never been to a dyno and no one points it out.

Good luck with your setup, I already see why most no longer post here it is simply too much trouble.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM.

story-0
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-3
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-4
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-5
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

The world was a better place when it was still around.

By Brett Foote | 2026-01-23 09:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

Slideshow: The 7.0-liter LS7 was designed for absolute cutting-edge performance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-07 18:36:00


VIEW MORE