93 myth?
and now i have a cc306 and a properly running motor so i cant imagine what times im going to be running
Mostly the 95's and 97's are quicker only cuz of the Ram Air induction unlike the early 4th gen T/As and Formulas.
But I also found specs on 93-97 LT1 cams, and 93 lt1's have a slightly bigger cam than others. and when I say slightly I mean like a couple thousandths of an inch so not really dramatic but maybe it helps a little haha.
Also may I add that I raced an 03' Mach 1 stang (40 MPH roll each time)and I beat him twice by a car length and he beat me twice by a fender. ( pretty good for stock). and also totally owned an 05' GT 5speed Slutstang by two car lengths from a dig.
Last edited by 93M6Formula; Sep 30, 2008 at 07:56 PM.
Mostly the 95's and 97's are quicker only cuz of the Ram Air induction unlike the early 4th gen T/As and Formulas.
But I also found specs on 93-97 LT1 cams, and 93 lt1's have a slightly bigger cam than others. and when I say slightly I mean like a couple thousandths of an inch so not really dramatic but maybe it helps a little haha.
Also may I add that I raced an 03' Mach 1 stang (40 MPH roll each time)and I beat him twice by a car length and he beat me twice by a fender. ( pretty good for stock). and also totally owned an 05' GT 5speed Slutstang by two car lengths from a dig.
Aren't our cars supposed to do 5.4s?
And I keep mixing up cams now after looking at so many and misplacing links to the specs. 93 is .450/.460 and the rest are .447/.459 right?
Ive usually heard 95s being the strongest running engines but I agree with what someone else said - probably depends on the day the car was made more than anything, and how well its been maintained.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time



