Manual Transmission T56 | T5 | MN12 | Clutches | Hydraulics | Shifters

How can I increase shifting speed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2008, 02:05 PM
  #21  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Unless there is a mechanical problem somewhere, shifting is easy. I recall the video you posted, and Im sure it looked like it was taking you 1-2 secs or more to shift ??

When racing, mine usually take 0.4secs from start to finish ( foot off throttle, to back on ) so shift prob takes a fraction less.
Thats pretty much every time unless its a bad shift, or Im not trying too hard.

If the clutch was dragging a little, it would be more noticable on the downshifts, than the upshifts.

This is the Fuchs oil I had been using. Its German.

Nothing fancy, but it worked great for me.





Originally Posted by SladeX
You really expect that under that kind of pressure you can do a perfect 1-2 shift?

Once you mod the suspension (torque arm, LCA's, LCA relocation kit, pan hard, shocks and drag swaybar) the car will have an easier time going straight, but back when mine was stock, half the concentration was gaining traction and half was keeping the car straight all in the short time it takes to hit 6k rpm in 1st. Hence why it takes a LOT of practice.

With heated 315 nittos, a clutch drop at 4k and a near perfect launch, I finally pulled a 1.9 60 ft, the near perfect 1-2 shift in which I chriped that shift HARD and chirped the 2-3 shift and SCREWED UP the 3-4 shift on account of a sweaty hand. Managed a 12.9 on that pass, but I imagine if I didn't mess up I had a mid 12 or lower in the making. After that the nittos were dead and couldn't do better than a 2.2 60 ft.

It's harder to shift on track than it is in normal driving. I've got 2 friends that have driven stick for a good 10+ years while I've only driven stick for 4 years officially, 3 years with this car. Yet neither have come close to attempting the speed shifts and power shifts I can do. 100+ track runs will teach you a lot.
1.9sec is hardly slamming....

I managed 1.8x on 245 Nittos, and 1.7x MT DR's. I dont think Ive ever missed a 1-2 shift. Its not that hard really, unless you have a very dodgy seat or driving position.
I hope that if I can get to a decent track, and my rear ARB works....I can get 60fts down to the 1.5x range. The tracks I race at dont always prep the surface though, which is crap.

And powershifting a syncro box is asking for something to break.
Old 02-06-2008, 02:48 PM
  #22  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SladeX
driving in the city with no precise timing is one thing

Driving at the track and shifting in under a second at high rpm while the car is slamming you in your seat is another.

On a good hook with little wheel spin, the car slams you into your seat pretty hard all the way to redline at the same time you are fighting the steering wheel to keep straight. You really expect that under that kind of pressure you can do a perfect 1-2 shift?

Once you mod the suspension (torque arm, LCA's, LCA relocation kit, pan hard, shocks and drag swaybar) the car will have an easier time going straight, but back when mine was stock, half the concentration was gaining traction and half was keeping the car straight all in the short time it takes to hit 6k rpm in 1st. Hence why it takes a LOT of practice.

With heated 315 nittos, a clutch drop at 4k and a near perfect launch, I finally pulled a 1.9 60 ft, the near perfect 1-2 shift in which I chriped that shift HARD and chirped the 2-3 shift and SCREWED UP the 3-4 shift on account of a sweaty hand. Managed a 12.9 on that pass, but I imagine if I didn't mess up I had a mid 12 or lower in the making. After that the nittos were dead and couldn't do better than a 2.2 60 ft.

It's harder to shift on track than it is in normal driving. I've got 2 friends that have driven stick for a good 10+ years while I've only driven stick for 4 years officially, 3 years with this car. Yet neither have come close to attempting the speed shifts and power shifts I can do. 100+ track runs will teach you a lot.
With your power on heated 315 Nittos and decent track prep, you should be pulling much better 60' times than 1.9.

On 275 Nittos and mediocre track prep, I pulled a 1.78 60' with 386/344, and I'm not an awesome driver yet.

What gears are you running?
Old 02-06-2008, 03:15 PM
  #23  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (63)
 
VIPRETR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 757
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just something to think about. Check to make sure your motor mounts and tranny mount are ok. Oh, and a Pro-Shifted trans does wonders for up shifting on these LS1 hydraulics, almost feels like I'm back in an LT1
Old 02-06-2008, 05:50 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
 
SladeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

let's put it this way, I'm running the damn stock 10 bolt with 3.42 gears. Anything more than a 1.9 and I'm probably towing it home. I know a few that have cut 1.7-1.8 and were on the verge of shattering the gears on inspection after they started hearing noises out the rear.

Each launch at 4k makes me wonder if this is the launch that kills it. I was also running stock shocks. I just swapped them out and hopefully I'll cut the wheel spin down. I also have a torque arm on order as well as I was running the stocker and god knows how much that thing can flex under load.
Old 02-07-2008, 08:03 AM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SladeX
let's put it this way, I'm running the damn stock 10 bolt with 3.42 gears. Anything more than a 1.9 and I'm probably towing it home. I know a few that have cut 1.7-1.8 and were on the verge of shattering the gears on inspection after they started hearing noises out the rear.

Each launch at 4k makes me wonder if this is the launch that kills it. I was also running stock shocks. I just swapped them out and hopefully I'll cut the wheel spin down. I also have a torque arm on order as well as I was running the stocker and god knows how much that thing can flex under load.
That's not too bad for stock suspension and stock gears. A set of 4.10s (especially in a 12-bolt) will help you out a LOT.

And yeah, even the 4K launches are most likely going to eat that rear up pretty soon.
Old 02-07-2008, 08:06 AM
  #26  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Fran D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington Crossing, PA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tici
Normal cruising.
Above 3000 rpm it shifts better, the higher the better.
Normally I try to shift at 2000 rpm to save some fuel (it costs here now 1.85 CHF / Liter = $6.4 / Gallon
Well, this is a puzzler. I don't know why it would be harder to shift under normal cruise with little to no load on it. It should shift like butter.

I know you said the short stick caused too much noise, which is definitely the case, but was shifting effort at cruise noticeably different?

Another question, is this just 1-2, or through all the gears? I know that your car doesn't have the electrical hookup, but did your trans still have the skip shift solenoid in it? It shouldn't be actuated at all, but I wonder if it's somehow getting in the way?
Old 02-07-2008, 11:15 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tici's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Zurich - Switzerland
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Fran D
I know you said the short stick caused too much noise, which is definitely the case, but was shifting effort at cruise noticeably different?
Not really. It was just more direct and more notchy (this because there's no rubber in between).

Originally Posted by Fran D
Another question, is this just 1-2, or through all the gears? I know that your car doesn't have the electrical hookup, but did your trans still have the skip shift solenoid in it? It shouldn't be actuated at all, but I wonder if it's somehow getting in the way?
All gears, 1-2 is the slowest shift.
The solenoid isn't hooked up but it's still there. I looked at it's function when I rebuilt the tranny and it's not in the way.
Actually it shifts smooth, but I have to let the synchro clutches work before I can complete the shift.

When I rebuilt the tranny (4000 miles ago) I also installed a new stock clutch and a new slave cylinder. I also replaced the pilot bearing with a bronze bushing.
The drill mod is done and the master is a modified stock piece (adjustable).
There is no air in the system, I could feel that if there was any.
I bled the hydraulics before filling the tranny and installing the driveshaft. I then had a friend pushing on the clutch pedal, shift in 1st and with an old yoke installed in the tranny rear I was able to turn it by hand with no effort = the clutch disengages completely and the engine is completely separated from the tranny (engine turned off )

Maybe it's too soon? Maybe I need to wait a while under the new clutches adapt themselves to the tranny parts? Now it's all carbon stuff from Six Speeds Inc.
Old 02-07-2008, 12:09 PM
  #28  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Fran D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington Crossing, PA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tici
Maybe it's too soon? Maybe I need to wait a while under the new clutches adapt themselves to the tranny parts? Now it's all carbon stuff from Six Speeds Inc.
4000 miles would seem like more than enough time for a break-in to me. Did you ask Six Speeds directly what it could be?
Old 02-07-2008, 12:22 PM
  #29  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

My tranny was shifting fine with a few hundred miles on it ( after some clutch/ARP bolt issues )

When driving normally, my shifts certainly arent quick, but they have no need to be. But when I want to change gear hard, it isnt a problem either.

Have you tried being a little more aggressive with it ? Is it really that hard to get change ?

Are upshifts and downshifts the same ?
Old 02-07-2008, 12:57 PM
  #30  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Fran D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington Crossing, PA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
...ARP bolt issues
Not to hijack Stefano's thread, but what was the issue (since I've acquired a set for myself!)?
Old 02-07-2008, 01:06 PM
  #31  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Dont use ARP bolts with a twin/triple ExoSkel.

They foul the inner disc/rivets. Not nice when you didnt receive instructions stating this.
Old 02-07-2008, 01:14 PM
  #32  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Fran D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington Crossing, PA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Dont use ARP bolts with a twin/triple ExoSkel.
OK. I'm safe. Thanks.
Old 02-07-2008, 03:00 PM
  #33  
CARTEK Racing
iTrader: (13)
 
WS6TransAm01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have seen more of an improvement in my shifting with simple practice, more then anything else.

However;

I think a good clutch that can engage/disengage rapidly will allow for a much faster shift. My tranny is stock, with a stock Pro-5.0 shifter, with factory GM ATF fluid in it. And I think I shift pretty damn fast. What I think it irrelevant however, I have been told that I shift very fast.

The only think I attribute to it is clutch, and practice practice practice, oh yeah, and more practice.

Old 02-07-2008, 03:49 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tici's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Zurich - Switzerland
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo

Have you tried being a little more aggressive with it ? Is it really that hard to get change ?

Are upshifts and downshifts the same ?
Ahemmhhh... more aggressive... OK I really baby it, when I go hard on it it shifts faster. Just the other stick cars I had didn't need so much force (Alfa Romeo, Vauxhall, Fiat, Audi 4 Turbo, VW Golf... this kind of cars).
I really feel that I'm forcing the rings against the gears to stop them and I don't like it.
Maybe it's just the oil... too slipppery? I'll try another product as soon as I can.

Downshift is worst, it takes longer (and yes, I go shortly on the gas to match the rpm).

I also tried the "5000 rpm test" (put the car on a flat surface, desingege the clutch, select 1st gear and rev it up to 5000 rpm). The car didin't move.

Fran: I didn't ask the parts supplier. I didn't want to hear stuff like who made the insatllation, have you checked the tolerances, is the clutch installed properly, have you bleed the hydraulics, send us back the parts to check them... All in all it shift better than before, but I was expecting something different. I also ordered a new master but the old one is still ok (to my poor knowledge) and I haven't installed it.
Old 02-07-2008, 03:50 PM
  #35  
TECH Addict
 
SladeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If anything low rpm shifting with good rev matching should slide like butter. If I want to out accelerate cars with the revs down I usually speed shift pretty quick from 1-2 and 2-3. With no body jarring that's a pretty much bang bang type shift under 3k. Even above that, it only becomes tricky at 6k+.

Can you do a FAST 1-2 shift off the line at say 3k similar to how you can pull a 3-4 shift? I say that because the 3-4 shift is probably the fastest shift you can pull off, even at speed or at WOT. If you find that the 3-4 shift is significantly faster or that 1-2 grinds or blocks you a little, you may have issues with the clutch or syncros. I'd rebleed to be sure.
Old 02-07-2008, 04:01 PM
  #36  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

If you jack the rear of the car up ( and mount securely on axle stands of course ), and put it in gear with the clutch pedal depressed....do the rear wheels turn ?
Old 02-08-2008, 05:00 AM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tici's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Zurich - Switzerland
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
If you jack the rear of the car up ( and mount securely on axle stands of course ), and put it in gear with the clutch pedal depressed....do the rear wheels turn ?
a little bit...
Old 02-08-2008, 05:11 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tici's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Zurich - Switzerland
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SladeX
If anything low rpm shifting with good rev matching should slide like butter. If I want to out accelerate cars with the revs down I usually speed shift pretty quick from 1-2 and 2-3. With no body jarring that's a pretty much bang bang type shift under 3k. Even above that, it only becomes tricky at 6k+.

Can you do a FAST 1-2 shift off the line at say 3k similar to how you can pull a 3-4 shift? I say that because the 3-4 shift is probably the fastest shift you can pull off, even at speed or at WOT. If you find that the 3-4 shift is significantly faster or that 1-2 grinds or blocks you a little, you may have issues with the clutch or syncros. I'd rebleed to be sure.
3-4 shift is faster than 1-2.
All synchros are new (carbon), included a 3-4 fork (steel), billet keys and pads (bronze).
The clutch was well prepared for the install: splines deburred, cleaned and slightly greased. Clutch surface, flywheel + PP degreased.
The flywheel bolts are sealed with a little RTV to avoid oil coming through the threads. New rear block seal too.
The bronze bushing has been filled with tranny oil before installation.

Another thing: i have the stock Throttle Cracker tables. This allows the engine to reduce speed slowly to avoid lash shake when you remove the engine load (lift the right foot).
I can make the engine to decel faster if I zero the table. Shifting is much better then.
Is that something you guys do to improve shifting? To mess with those tables?
The idle vacuum is fine 28-30 kPa, no vacuum leaks that would allow a slow rpm drop.

...I hear you guys that say to flush the hydraulics again... I'll try that too.

Stefano
Old 02-08-2008, 06:28 AM
  #39  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
SlowSS416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd try a real short throw with a short stick...it might do more than you think.
Old 02-08-2008, 08:05 AM
  #40  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Fran D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington Crossing, PA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tici
...Another thing: i have the stock Throttle Cracker tables. This allows the engine to reduce speed slowly to avoid lash shake when you remove the engine load (lift the right foot).
I can make the engine to decel faster if I zero the table. Shifting is much better then.
Is that something you guys do to improve shifting? To mess with those tables?
I haven't messed with my stock tables, but which one are you talking about? Are the values left over from your automatic days? One of my stock tables, Airflow Decay vs. Speed, is zeroed out above 12 MPH. Is that what you see? For Airflow Decay Delay vs. Speed, it's all at 63.999 seconds above 12 MPH. The other table, Airflow vs. RPM vs. Speed, only has zero values at 0 MPH from 400 to 1600 RPM. I can send you each of my tables if you like.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.