Jermzz 454ci vs 650hp TT 300zx freeway.
#41
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
#42
Village Idiot
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Monica, California
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, I think the 300zx twins are true pieces of ****... The multiple 300zx twins that I owned in the past always gave me mechanical trouble... When it was time to actually work on them it was a nighmare and a half... You practically have to remove the engine just to change the spark plugs... Clutches burned out fast...Needless to say those original turbo's always lost boost, overheated constantly like a bitch if you roasted the car..
If the newer 350z's are worse cars then the 91-96 300zx twins then the new Nissan owners are in serious trouble...
![Chug! Chug! Chug!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_chug.gif)
25psi - I never knew the stock 300zx twin blocks could handle "650whp", that in itself is truely impressive if true.. Perks to Nissan for that atleast.... I did not know that, as I never seriously modified any of my prior 300z's...
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
#47
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay area, ca.
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I dunno, it's not Octavian. He's pushing around 900rw. ima go after him on the bottle.
Same crew im sure, there's like 4 of them all pushing around 600 - 650rwhp, then octavin.
well see. Its gonna be a good summer.
Same crew im sure, there's like 4 of them all pushing around 600 - 650rwhp, then octavin.
well see. Its gonna be a good summer.