2003 Audi RS6 vs 2009 CTS-V (Highway Pulls)
07-19-2009, 05:33 PM
#21
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chill out dude, you're going to give yourself indigestion freaking out like that over a video. While yes, this is an LS forum, we appreciate MOST vehicles that are tastefully done. If someone threw a rod like you did every time an import video was on this forum, there wouldn't be a multimedia exchange. Lighten up.
Nice audi... got some serious horsepower to outrun that caddy! (though I will admit I'd rather see the caddy take the win!)
Nice audi... got some serious horsepower to outrun that caddy! (though I will admit I'd rather see the caddy take the win!)
07-19-2009, 07:32 PM
#22
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
You guys get your panties in a bunch way to easy. His video reminded me of the stroked m5 video that outran the caddy. These guys get off on outrunnin a stock unit with a car that costs more and has mods. If I did all that and knew I could've bought a better car for cheaper I would'nt be on here braggin bought it. Nice truck spoonin......now go work on it.
07-19-2009, 09:30 PM
#23
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys get your panties in a bunch way to easy. His video reminded me of the stroked m5 video that outran the caddy. These guys get off on outrunnin a stock unit with a car that costs more and has mods. If I did all that and knew I could've bought a better car for cheaper I would'nt be on here braggin bought it. Nice truck spoonin......now go work on it.
07-20-2009, 07:14 PM
#25
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Okinawa Japan
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea dude I'm a ricer.... Check out my sig. I don't own anything without a v8 and 4.10 gears stupid. Lame kill not like the bus lengths I would put on you. The fact is he posted to prove something and all he proved is that the german junk needs mods to barely outrun the caddy.
The Caddy is def a nice car and stock for stock it would give an 03 Audi RS6 more than it can handle. But lets not get carried away now shall we? For one an RS6 is an EXTREMELY nice ride- one could make a very strong arguement that it's actually nicer than the CTS-V, but that's a matter of taste. One advantage the Audi has is the AWD- it will hand the Caddy it's *** in the twisties and also has a VERY strong top end. But since you want to compare a NEW caddy to a 6 yr old RS6- why don't we make things fair and compare the new caddy to the NEW RS6? Fair is fair right?- of course you'll be crying the blues when the V goes down in flames in EVERY category!! Truth be told the Caddy is an extremely nice sport/luxury car. But to say that it bests ALL "euro-trash" sedans is extremely myopic on your part. Hey we get it- you like American vehicles, most of us here do too. But lets not be so "fan-boi" about it that we can't give props to other vehicles that are just as good if not better hmmmm?
07-22-2009, 06:46 AM
#27
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
The caddy beat them all around the 'ring so I doubt it's getting it's *** handed to it to bad. We to our BMW M3 and out ran the Audi R8 at Limerock park in the rain when we raced in the speed gt series..... yea I'm not just a "fan boy" I have worked on the euro trash. The biggest advantage of awd is from a dig. We could set on the pole and the audi would hole shot us and once everything would get goin good we could work our way back around it sometimes.... sometimes not.
07-22-2009, 07:31 AM
#28
TECH Regular
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey OP give us a little more info on that car. Nice runs, have you ever had your car down the track? And DAAAMN i like those cts-v's.
Not agreeing that german cars are "euro trash" but the cts-v IS the fastest 4 door productoin sedan to EVER go around the nurinburg ring, under 8.00....so i dont think it will be "going down in flames in ever category"
Not agreeing that german cars are "euro trash" but the cts-v IS the fastest 4 door productoin sedan to EVER go around the nurinburg ring, under 8.00....so i dont think it will be "going down in flames in ever category"
07-22-2009, 12:22 PM
#29
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I heard that the RS4 went around the ring in 7:58 with Frank Stippler at the realm. I think this time is fishy, but I read (what I could) about it in a German car mag. It doesn't seem possible, but it might have been the driver...
Also, the new Porsche Panamera turbo went around in 7:56. Iwould still pick the cts-v over either though.
Also, the new Porsche Panamera turbo went around in 7:56. Iwould still pick the cts-v over either though.
07-23-2009, 06:08 PM
#34
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Okinawa Japan
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey OP give us a little more info on that car. Nice runs, have you ever had your car down the track? And DAAAMN i like those cts-v's.
Not agreeing that german cars are "euro trash" but the cts-v IS the fastest 4 door productoin sedan to EVER go around the nurinburg ring, under 8.00....so i dont think it will be "going down in flames in ever category"
Not agreeing that german cars are "euro trash" but the cts-v IS the fastest 4 door productoin sedan to EVER go around the nurinburg ring, under 8.00....so i dont think it will be "going down in flames in ever category"
And I'm not saying the Caddy is a bad car....but I can think of more than a couple EURO 4doors I'd take over it.
But to each their own.
08-03-2009, 01:51 PM
#37
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Here and sometimes there too.
Posts: 13,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CTS-V = LSA engine.
ZR-1 = LS9 engine.
Both are 6.2L,
LS9 has a 2300 on it,
LSA has a 1900 on it I believe
There's also a bunch of tiny differences between the two like baffles in the intake runners on the LS9, bigger IC, etc...
Also difference in tuning, LS9 makes 638hp LSA makes 550hp
ZR-1 = LS9 engine.
Both are 6.2L,
LS9 has a 2300 on it,
LSA has a 1900 on it I believe
There's also a bunch of tiny differences between the two like baffles in the intake runners on the LS9, bigger IC, etc...
Also difference in tuning, LS9 makes 638hp LSA makes 550hp
08-03-2009, 02:01 PM
#38
CTS-V = LSA engine.
ZR-1 = LS9 engine.
Both are 6.2L,
LS9 has a 2300 on it,
LSA has a 1900 on it I believe
There's also a bunch of tiny differences between the two like baffles in the intake runners on the LS9, bigger IC, etc...
Also difference in tuning, LS9 makes 638hp LSA makes 550hp
ZR-1 = LS9 engine.
Both are 6.2L,
LS9 has a 2300 on it,
LSA has a 1900 on it I believe
There's also a bunch of tiny differences between the two like baffles in the intake runners on the LS9, bigger IC, etc...
Also difference in tuning, LS9 makes 638hp LSA makes 550hp
