Whats wrong with this picture?
12-02-2003, 11:11 PM
#4
TECH Addict
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say its a converted formula or firebird. One is because of the hardtop, but two....look at the fog lights. Those arn't stock TA foglights for the 98 and up body style.
12-03-2003, 12:10 AM
#6
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think its photo shopped. It mostly looks that way if you look at the passanger side DRL area, lots of little parts look like they shouldnt be there. Plus the fog lights aren't sunken in far enough.
Trending Topics
12-03-2003, 06:57 AM
#8
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the distortion around the DRL area is where the pic was folded and scanned. You can see the sean all the way up to the top. It would look good with black roof and mirrors like the anniversary.
12-03-2003, 01:12 PM
#11
Chop-Foo Director
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Haymarket, Virginia
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks like a seam, agreed. BUT, notice how on the left
side the window has a blue tint to it?
The driver's headrest looks a little funky. Probably from
the two pages in a magazine.
The color thing bothers me tho.
side the window has a blue tint to it?
The driver's headrest looks a little funky. Probably from
the two pages in a magazine.
The color thing bothers me tho.
12-03-2003, 02:32 PM
#12
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Addison, Illinois
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats from a 98 review of the trans am, which made the cover page as "trans formed". Had a good review on the trans am and applauded the enginers at gm for a job well done and that sort of stuff in it. thats a 2 page shot of the car. no doubt 
