Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

2011 GT vs 2010 SS Vs 2010 Challenger : ->BURNOUT Contest!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2010, 08:39 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
06X6spdGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 2011 GT vs 2010 SS Vs 2010 Challenger : ->BURNOUT Contest!!!

http://www.insideline.com/features/b...lenger-rt.html

LOL!!! With the Biggest Tires!!
Old 04-13-2010, 08:42 PM
  #2  
Teching In
 
summitss/rsls3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: grand island, ne
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not to mention that it burned out longer in 2nd gear that the mustang did all together.
Old 04-13-2010, 08:51 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That has got to be one of the best New Car tests I've ever seen!! A++ for originality!
Old 04-14-2010, 12:37 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
the_husk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kansas/North Dakota
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ROFL at the mustangs "mighty" 309 ft-lbs of torque.
Old 04-14-2010, 06:44 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah.. the Camaro may be slower than the Mustang, but it can do neater burnouts!1
Old 04-14-2010, 07:28 AM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
Yeah.. the Camaro may be slower than the Mustang, but it can do neater burnouts!1
hey now, thats a low blow

oh well, badass test. i say add it to all edmunds tests. glad the bowtie can bring home the W
Old 04-14-2010, 12:11 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Camaro Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, Iowa
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by the_husk
ROFL at the mustangs "mighty" 309 ft-lbs of torque.
I'm pretty sure they are rated at 390, must have been a typo.

I thought the comparison was kind of dumb, anybody can do a clutch dump in a manual car.
Old 04-14-2010, 01:14 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
the_husk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kansas/North Dakota
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

And, it all boils down to the different tires they all had, suspension, etc.
Old 04-14-2010, 01:15 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
the_husk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kansas/North Dakota
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Camaro Z
I'm pretty sure they are rated at 390, must have been a typo.
Ah ok. Thanks
Old 04-14-2010, 02:27 PM
  #10  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
TriGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: G'Vegas
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

useless test. I would rather have the car that had the shortest burnout length from a 6,000rpm clutch dump...burnouts for show, traction for go!!!

Seemed like he short shifted the Camaro and bounced of the rev limiter in the mustang and challenger...
Old 04-14-2010, 03:10 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Cole Train's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 2,829
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

exactly the reason the Camaro loses to the 5.0 in a drag race, no traction and bad accelleration outta the hole
Old 04-14-2010, 03:14 PM
  #12  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That, and it has a lower power to weight ratio.
Old 04-14-2010, 05:04 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Cole Train's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 2,829
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

that and better gearing
Old 04-14-2010, 06:35 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
 
| Powered by Satan |'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston / University of Texas, Austin
Posts: 6,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

dumbasses should have started in 2nd gear.
Old 04-14-2010, 08:47 PM
  #15  
Teching In
 
F8L BYT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville / Indianapolis
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

LMFAO about his mullet comment!!!
Old 04-16-2010, 06:23 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
1989k1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ravenna, MI
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by F8L BYT
LMFAO about his mullet comment!!!
He had the Grave Digger hat, he didnt need a mullet.
Old 04-17-2010, 03:39 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Spoolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Here and sometimes there too.
Posts: 13,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

He should push the seat up a little further, I don't think he was close enough to the steering wheel.
Old 04-18-2010, 05:44 AM
  #18  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Nitroused383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Wow this guy sucks at burnouts. I smoke them all by about 1000' haha

Sorry but this is how you do a burnout
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYIqTCqFy7U
Old 04-18-2010, 10:05 PM
  #19  
Teching In
 
LS1_MeMoRy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Jacksonville,NC
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool test. But pretty dissappointing results. Get Ken Block to do the test or Tanner foust. See if you get the same results...
Old 04-18-2010, 10:43 PM
  #20  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just goes to show you spinning aint winning



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.