Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

Light bolt-on '11 V6 Mustang; 13.17 @ 107mph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2010, 07:07 AM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Clean94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nasty!!!! and just think people use to think the fox bodies and lt1 power fbodys were fast stock
Old 12-05-2010, 08:08 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

It might make the near stock LT1 and 2v Mustang crowd worry, but that's about it. Keep in mind at that track in the same conditions numerous stock LS1s have gone 12s, even the stock 3v Mustangs run those times.
Old 12-05-2010, 12:42 PM
  #23  
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Stock 3Vs don't trap 107mph, and races don't just happen at the track. I can imagine a modded V6 (especially an auto) would be pretty damn easy to launch, so I think they are gonna do well on the streets.
Old 12-05-2010, 01:59 PM
  #24  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
RaggedRides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wilkes-barre
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm thoroughly impressed with Fords new V6. Just as much as I am with the 5.0.
Old 12-14-2010, 09:25 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Stock 3Vs don't trap 107mph, and races don't just happen at the track.
Around here in the conditions they absolutely do. I've seen several go 13.3 @ 106. Again, the LT1s run just as quick, and many stock LS1s have gone 12s. Stock 5.0 Mustangs ran 14 flat.
Old 12-14-2010, 09:30 PM
  #26  
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Stock LT1s go 13.3 @ 106mph routinely? I know there's been a few '96-'97 LT1 SS's that have done that, but "the LT1s" doesn't exactly cover that. Most LT1s are mid-high 13s cars at best, and trap 100-102mph. The entire point of this thread was to show that with a few choice parts, this new V6 Mustang can disappoint quite a few people on the street or at the track.
Old 12-15-2010, 02:57 AM
  #27  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Looks like it will disappoint some stock older cars, sure. Not sure why you'd buy a v6 mustang to mod but to each their own. They are sweet daily drivers, i like em.
Old 12-15-2010, 03:06 AM
  #28  
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's not necessarily that you buy it to mod it... but if you buy it because you like it and you want a little more punch, $1,000 will get you pretty damn far it seems.
Old 12-15-2010, 10:11 AM
  #29  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chavez885
Looks like it will disappoint some stock older cars, sure. Not sure why you'd buy a v6 mustang to mod but to each their own. They are sweet daily drivers, i like em.
Because it's ~$22k brand new and runs low 13s with minor bolt-ons? Not everyone has the money for a V8 (Car, insurance, and gas all cost more) and this V6 is pretty bad ***. Considering that's probably better than a LT1 with the same mods would do, I understand your concerns
Old 12-15-2010, 08:38 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Most LT1s are mid-high 13s cars at best, and trap 100-102mph.
In average conditions, yes. In the conditions that the Mustang in question ran in, I've seen several stock LT1s (years ago) run 13.4-13.5 @ 106/107. So again, in those conditions, most of todays performance cars need not worry about modded V6 Mustangs. Just to hit the point home a little more, that Mustang is running about 1/2 second faster and 4-5mph faster than typical conditions solely due to the magic air around here this time of year, the same air ALL ENGINES will breathe.
Old 12-15-2010, 08:42 PM
  #31  
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You're absolutely right Marc... there is nothing special or impressive at all about a V6 Mustang with a few bolt-ons and gears running 13.2 @ 108mph
Old 12-15-2010, 08:58 PM
  #32  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
It's not necessarily that you buy it to mod it... but if you buy it because you like it and you want a little more punch, $1,000 will get you pretty damn far it seems.
True.
Old 12-15-2010, 11:34 PM
  #33  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
gocartone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eau Claire-ish, WI
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
In average conditions, yes. In the conditions that the Mustang in question ran in, I've seen several stock LT1s (years ago) run 13.4-13.5 @ 106/107. So again, in those conditions, most of todays performance cars need not worry about modded V6 Mustangs. Just to hit the point home a little more, that Mustang is running about 1/2 second faster and 4-5mph faster than typical conditions solely due to the magic air around here this time of year, the same air ALL ENGINES will breathe.
In normal non "magic" air conditions Motortrend, of all places, went 13.7 at 102mph! That's nothing to sneeze at and beats out stock LT1's.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...t_numbers.html

I have no doubt that in regular air we will be seeing bolt on V6's hitting high 12s/low 13s. Hell this one was still on the stock tires wasn't it? That's leaving a good bit on the table still. Is it the fastest car out there? Hell no, but this is a V6 Mustang we are talking about and those are some DAMN impressive numbers.
Old 12-15-2010, 11:40 PM
  #34  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
earlz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SNJ
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm just gonna have to swap out my 17 year old lt1 and get a brand new mustang v-6 engine in
Old 12-16-2010, 03:11 AM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Pwebbz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denton, Tx
Posts: 1,248
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That's what 1500 PSI of fuel pressure will get you!!
Old 12-16-2010, 03:13 AM
  #36  
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's not direct injection yet.
Old 12-16-2010, 03:44 AM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Pwebbz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denton, Tx
Posts: 1,248
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That's crazy! Same numbers from the camaro but
WITH direct port. I agree the V6 in that mustang sounds alot like a old M3. If it was in any ford package but a mustang I wouldn't mind drivng it.
Old 12-16-2010, 03:46 AM
  #38  
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've never seen a V6 Camaro run the same times as a new V6 Mustang stock or with bolt-ons.
Old 12-16-2010, 04:18 AM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SlvrV6Camaro
Very impressive, its really nice to see the V6 cars actually become something worth talking about.
86-87 Turbo buicks.....enough said.
Old 12-16-2010, 04:19 AM
  #40  
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm sure he meant to say "naturally aspirated V6 cars."



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.