Light bolt-on '11 V6 Mustang; 13.17 @ 107mph
12-16-2010, 01:05 PM
#42
11 Second Club
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jerzy
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it doesnt touch the engine's oil, its a bolt on
Thats pretty darn impressive. Throw a nice stall converter in there and some drag radials and its going 12s with no problem. Even sounds good!
And to all the LT1 nutswingers- Really? low 13s stock? Thats like the Mach 1 guys saying they hit 12s stock
Just accept the fact that ford has finally come around and produced some mustangs that dont need a blower to go fast 
Last edited by 98TADRIVER; 12-16-2010 at 01:12 PM.
12-16-2010, 03:20 PM
#43
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it doesnt touch the engine's oil, its a bolt on
Thats pretty darn impressive. Throw a nice stall converter in there and some drag radials and its going 12s with no problem. Even sounds good!
And to all the LT1 nutswingers- Really? low 13s stock? Thats like the Mach 1 guys saying they hit 12s stock Just accept the fact that ford has finally come around and produced some mustangs that dont need a blower to go fast
Thats pretty darn impressive. Throw a nice stall converter in there and some drag radials and its going 12s with no problem. Even sounds good!
And to all the LT1 nutswingers- Really? low 13s stock? Thats like the Mach 1 guys saying they hit 12s stock
Just accept the fact that ford has finally come around and produced some mustangs that dont need a blower to go fast
12-17-2010, 04:00 PM
#44
In normal non "magic" air conditions Motortrend, of all places, went 13.7 at 102mph! That's nothing to sneeze at and beats out stock LT1's.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...t_numbers.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...t_numbers.html
12-17-2010, 04:03 PM
#45
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They ran a '97 LT1 SS to a 13.6 @ 106mph, and it's been discussed here time and time again how those seem to be quicker than other LT1 F-bodies. I didn't realize you'd be this bothered by a V6 Mustang running these times.
Last edited by Irunelevens; 12-17-2010 at 05:25 PM.
12-18-2010, 12:23 PM
#49
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-19-2010, 09:16 AM
#51
Because unlike a few of you in this thread, I know firsthand how ALL cars in general run at that track. EVERYTHING runs quicker and faster here. The V6 Mustang time, taken in context, will not hurt many feelings. I bet if I posted a video of a 2011 GT running low 14s at Bandimere you would think there is something wrong with it...
12-19-2010, 02:03 PM
#53
***Repost Police***
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a $23k car new, and some people like new cars. 
