Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

'05 GT at the track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2004, 10:18 PM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Thumbs down '05 GT at the track

Ford does it again! Dumbshits.

http://home.comcast.net/~morr81/100_1305.MOV

This was taken at the local track.
Old 08-04-2004, 10:58 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
Vendetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC metro area
Posts: 9,339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Old 08-04-2004, 11:02 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
OneMeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old 08-04-2004, 11:45 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (17)
 
LT1TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

didn't work 4 me, probably because i'm going to find a way to down them regardless.
Old 08-04-2004, 11:48 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
 
CraZee ZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sad...
Old 08-04-2004, 11:49 PM
  #6  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1TA
didn't work 4 me, probably because i'm going to find a way to down them regardless.
Great post.
Old 08-04-2004, 11:52 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Z28Venom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USN, Haze Grey and Underway
Posts: 2,900
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

-- Could have just been a bad driver?
Old 08-05-2004, 12:14 AM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't think people have ever really bought Mustang GTs because they were excellent drag cars.

But it does make Ford's choice of keeping that live rear axle questionable (cough *cheaper to manufacture* cough).
Old 08-05-2004, 07:34 AM
  #9  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LT1TA
didn't work 4 me, probably because i'm going to find a way to down them regardless.
FYI - "14.20 @ 96"

I think that's just lame because it's got "300hp" and is a totally new car. You'd think they'd have done something a bit better

Oh well. Hopefully for them, the guy couldn't drive.
Old 08-05-2004, 08:01 AM
  #10  
Humanitarian
iTrader: (4)
 
Joe "Preachers Sheets" DIESO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 6,466
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

what does the car weigh? that time & mph just doesnt seem right. sure those cars are slow but come on now.
Old 08-05-2004, 08:01 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
STRIPSTAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phila, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I disagree. Atleast Ford makes an affordable rear drive sports car. The have established they can make HP with their cars. They probably dont want or need to make it quicker. That can be for the Peeps that pony up for a Cobra.
Old 08-05-2004, 10:36 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If you look at it, Dtyson makes a ton of sense. Ford doesn't have any direct competition for its Mustang. It's top dog at the dealerships now. Camaro and Firebird are dead and almost no import is coming close to its performance for the money, although it does have to stay away from the NeonNeonNeon-4 lol. The G.T.O , WRX STI, Mitsu EVO, are all priced in the mid 30s around here, so comparing an affordable mustang to one of them is just crazy. Ford has never really put the late model mustang out with big doses of HP, but still continued to sell tons of them to every brett, philbert and tommy around. The Cobra takes up the rest of the slack, and from the tons of those running around here in my neck of the woods they have no problem selling those either.
Old 08-05-2004, 04:34 PM
  #13  
12 Second Club
 
2000WhiteTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Allen/Denton
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The only Mustangs I would buy would be the supercharged Cobra and the Ford GT, not technically a Mustang but oh well.
Old 08-05-2004, 04:58 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
 
ls1hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah

the ford gt looks good

but **** $150,000
Old 08-05-2004, 05:08 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
 
Mike's02Z28M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What was the name of that track, Milan? Anyone know what the elevation is there?

Also, he ran a 14.2 @ 96, my old LT1 A4 (stock) ran a 14.4 @ 97. I bet that car driven right will be a high 13 second car. Seems respectable to me considering the Cobra is out there for folks that want the big powa!
Old 08-05-2004, 08:57 PM
  #16  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike's02Z28M6
I bet that car driven right will be a high 13 second car. Seems respectable to me
Not with the technology available. Not to mention it's a 300hp car.

The thing must weigh a ton.
Old 08-05-2004, 08:58 PM
  #17  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Milan is at 600'. DA is usually 2000'. No big deal. That's my home track. My bone stock A4 LS1 went 13.67 @ 105mph so it's not the weather/altitude.
Old 08-05-2004, 09:54 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
 
CraZee ZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I dont know. I still think the Mustang GT should of had 350hp and go mid to low 13s.

I know the gto, sti, evo arent in DIRECT competition. But still. With the HP wars 300hp isnt just enough anymore.

ALSO... FORD! STOP MAKING YOUR CARS FATTER! Weight sucks!
Old 08-05-2004, 10:12 PM
  #19  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
solid95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Austin, Tx.
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Maybe you guys should consider all the factors before talking all that ****. You dont know the driver, it's a first year design that weighs 3450 with out a driver, it's a 9.8:1 281ci motor that makes 300/315 on an engine dyno. Yea, it may not be all that fast, but it's still a bad *** car.

Last edited by solid95z; 08-05-2004 at 10:18 PM.
Old 08-05-2004, 10:27 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
gavspurplez's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

didn't work



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.