Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

Lucky Soldier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 06:59 PM
  #41  
WECIV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
Default

Christ beat the tax collectors in the temple with a cat of nine tails. God also instructed the Israelis to "utterly" destroy the "ites." Killing in battle is allowed in the Bible as is killing in self defense and capital punishment. I think God would have allowed this troop to cap that fart.
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #42  
sidewayz28's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 1
From: seattle
Default

can anyone find that video?? i want to see it now
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 12:29 AM
  #43  
Will Clark's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by WECIV
Will, the reason that Japan was never a large enough threat was their size. The Japanese do not have the people. They did not possess the power projection--people wise--to engage the US and harm us on our own turf. Also the the United States military had considerably more teeth back in the day and people that were actually willing to use all the teeth. Today we are much weaker physically and non-corporeally.
I'm not talking about WWII or anything even close. I'm talking about economics plain and simple. The Japanese economy looked something fierce about 30 years ago, then it fizzled out. What the Chinese economy is built on will fall even harder, do you have any idea how much debt they're in? I'll talk to my statistics guy and see what I can dig up for you.
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 12:38 AM
  #44  
StoleIt's Avatar
NKAWTG...N
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,759
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Originally Posted by WECIV
I hate to disagree with you Stoleit. The Chinese military may not be as technologically sophisticated as the Americans, however; the Allies during WWII were rude and crude compared to the *****. Numbers won out. The Korean War was almost won by China with hungry peasants armed with tommy guns and the occasional mortar. In the air the MiG15 as **** poor technologically compared to our F86's, however when you have 50 F86's and they have 300 MiG's it created a situation where we almost lost. Not only do the Chinese have numerical superiority, that is getting stronger. They also have a mindset that Sun Tzu would have liked. The Eastern mind whether it be a Chechan rebel in Grozny or a Communist in China is extremely dangerous. The mind is the most important weapon and the bottom up command structure of the Chinese is vastly superior to ours in actually using it. We oft times expect troops to shut their brain housing unit down and simply follow orders. Our troop losses would be much lower if we used a bottom up structure and allowed our military to "flow like water." Instead of flowing we try to attack the toughest structure in a Clauswitzian mindset. Attacking weakness is the Eastern way to fight a war, whereas we attack strengths. I do not think the economic issues bare our what you are saying. The Chinese own our debt and they actually produce things in their country. They are a threat enough that Japan, Russia, and India are scared crapless. In Russia alone there are 3-5 million Chinese. The Chinese have said for the last 600 yrs they will get back their stolen lands from Russia. Lands that are full of gold and oil. And, the Chinese have the monies to exploit the natural resources. America is far enough away and the Chinese possess a crappy delivery capability for their nukes, that for the moment we allow ourselves to be fat, dumb, and happy. We should be investing in better tactics, technics, and procedures for our naval and air forces (and some equipment). The Chinese are doing just that and building forces that can assymetrically attack our carriers. We better realize that we are in a very dangerous position.

Will, the reason that Japan was never a large enough threat was their size. The Japanese do not have the people. They did not possess the power projection--people wise--to engage the US and harm us on our own turf. Also the the United States military had considerably more teeth back in the day and people that were actually willing to use all the teeth. Today we are much weaker physically and non-corporeally.
I'd agree with you if the US was trying to invade main land China. But we aren't. The Chinese navy is a joke, as is their air force. And to address the argument of them having so many people, thats great, but they dont have the money nor the equipment to enlist them all into a formidable fighting force. Expect them to do what the Russian's did in WWII, one guy gets a gun the other gets a clip and go run at the enemy. The only people that have equipment/technology that can rival ours is the brits, and they don't sell stuff to China. The French on the other hand, bless their soul, sell everything short of their sister's virginity to them. But luckily the french lack a certain...how do you say...lack a decent military history...
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 01:54 AM
  #45  
o2bird's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: peoria, arizona
Default

Originally Posted by sidewayz28
can anyone find that video?? i want to see it now
http://www.big-boys.com/articles/ussniper.html
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 02:28 AM
  #46  
sidewayz28's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 1
From: seattle
Default

holy crap..........thank god that guys alright, i would love to have the chance to do that **** to those "insurgents" but i would get him in a vital spot. THE CABESA
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 10:02 AM
  #47  
WECIV's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
Default

"I'm not talking about WWII or anything even close. I'm talking about economics plain and simple. The Japanese economy looked something fierce about 30 years ago, then it fizzled out. What the Chinese economy is built on will fall even harder, do you have any idea how much debt they're in? I'll talk to my statistics guy and see what I can dig up for you."

I am not talking about WWII either. I am simply saying that the Japanese were not a threat militarily (in the 70's-80's). They lack the human resources to pull off another WWII. They abort more people than they produce and they have entirely too many old people to fight a real war. China is different. China does not owe anyone anything. Whereas they own our debt. They finance our debt. If they dumped all of our TBills our econ would be down the drain tomorrow. The Chinese Econ has been going since the 70's and there is not sign it is going anywhere, but up.


"I'd agree with you if the US was trying to invade main land China. But we aren't. The Chinese navy is a joke, as is their air force. And to address the argument of them having so many people, thats great, but they dont have the money nor the equipment to enlist them all into a formidable fighting force. Expect them to do what the Russian's did in WWII, one guy gets a gun the other gets a clip and go run at the enemy. The only people that have equipment/technology that can rival ours is the brits, and they don't sell stuff to China. The French on the other hand, bless their soul, sell everything short of their sister's virginity to them. But luckily the french lack a certain...how do you say...lack a decent military history..."

That is the same argument used about the Japanese before WWII. We thought we were superior to them, we were not. It took simple numbers to defeat the Japanese. If we had not had a limitless supply of munitions we would not have defeated the Japanese. They were vastly superior strategists. The Russians did a pretty good job if you ask me. They won WWII. .75 of all Germans were killed by Russians. Not bad for a bunch of ignorant farmers. Technology matters little, as long as you have the basics. The North Vietnamese technology was certainly not on par with ours, however they united the whole country, their objective.

The comment that the Chinese Navy and Air Force is a joke is a joke. The Chinese possess SU30's and 27's. The 27 outranges, out maneuvers our F15's and SU27's possesses Alamo missiles that outrange the slammer. As the Chinese economy keeps expanding the Chinese pilots will receive vast increases in their yearly hours, and they will become very proficient. Not only that but China is developing their own 4.5 generation fighters that will be as good as an F16. The Chinese Navy recently unveiled an Aegis class vessel complete with all the goodies US aegis uses (they simply stole the tech from us). The Chinese are also developing stealthy cruise missiles for their Navy. Combining the new missiles ships with SU27's (SU27 has an unrefueled range of 1000 miles). The Chinese can nullify our carriers if they use Chicanery, as an Eastern foe typically does.

The Chinese possess plenty of money to place into arms proctoring. The Chinese officially has the 3rd largest defense budget, however the US government has been viewing that number as of recently as vastly deflated. The Chinese are doing what the Meiji Japanese did in the 1890's. "Rich country strong arms." If you as a worker could make 100 bucks ten years ago and the economy improves to the point that you could make 150, you still make a hundred. The rest is skimmed off for arms procurment. Everyone thought the Japanese a joke until 1905 (even though the Russians would have won if the war had continued). Underestimating a foe is dangerous and our hubris will bite us in the *** if we are not careful.

If you do not think it can happen in the modern world simply take a look at what happened at Grozny to Russian armored/infantry units using massive ammounts of firepower and very Western tactics. We are vastly underestimating a threat that will surprise us a lot more than 9/11 ever did.
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #48  
LS69TA's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
From: Texarkana, Tx
Default

Originally Posted by 00TAProject
But one thing that this video does show, is that the body armor that we carry over here, (Soldiers and Civilians alike, I am here as a contractor) WORKS!!! Yes he is lucky and they should have let the soldier shoot that bitch ***.....
Where are you at? I was up in Balad at Camp Anaconda last summer. The body armor is worth it's weight in gold, but damn it's hot when you have to wear the vest and helmet everywhere. BTW what company are you working for?
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 08:47 PM
  #49  
StoleIt's Avatar
NKAWTG...N
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,759
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Originally Posted by WECIV
That is the same argument used about the Japanese before WWII. We thought we were superior to them, we were not. It took simple numbers to defeat the Japanese. If we had not had a limitless supply of munitions we would not have defeated the Japanese. They were vastly superior strategists. The Russians did a pretty good job if you ask me. They won WWII. .75 of all Germans were killed by Russians. Not bad for a bunch of ignorant farmers. Technology matters little, as long as you have the basics. The North Vietnamese technology was certainly not on par with ours, however they united the whole country, their objective.
the japanese weren't even close to us technologically during WW2. While I agree we used our massive production capabilities to produce weapons (some inferior to enemy ones IE: Sherman tank) most of the products we made in WW2 were far superior to Japanese designs. Our Navy was blatently superior and the only ship they had that would have been a challange was the Yamamoto, but that was run aground and used as a shore battery.

Originally Posted by WECIV
The comment that the Chinese Navy and Air Force is a joke is a joke. The Chinese possess SU30's and 27's. The 27 outranges, out maneuvers our F15's and SU27's possesses Alamo missiles that outrange the slammer. As the Chinese economy keeps expanding the Chinese pilots will receive vast increases in their yearly hours, and they will become very proficient. Not only that but China is developing their own 4.5 generation fighters that will be as good as an F16. The Chinese Navy recently unveiled an Aegis class vessel complete with all the goodies US aegis uses (they simply stole the tech from us). The Chinese are also developing stealthy cruise missiles for their Navy. Combining the new missiles ships with SU27's (SU27 has an unrefueled range of 1000 miles). The Chinese can nullify our carriers if they use Chicanery, as an Eastern foe typically does.
Their is no way to really blatently compair two different air craft, because its all opinionated. What I will say is that USAF pilots are the best in the world, no one else can match their training and state of readiness and support. The Mig 29 has range of 932 miles, while the F 15 has a range of 3570 miles with conformal fuel tanks (which are NOT drop tanks/wing tanks). So whats your point about range? Oh yes, F/A-22 > everything else.
Old Jul 25, 2005 | 11:12 PM
  #50  
Humvee z28's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Fort Greely, Alaska
Default

ok while i do not wish to engage in this argument i will say this... right now the US armed forces is moving away from the might is right motive and is moving towards the stealthy precision attack tactics. if we eliminate their major production facilities they cannot combat us, it will be our terms and our conditions. u all are focusing on something that can happen in 20 to 40 years, however the world is evolving at such a rate that a large scale war such as like WW2 will not happen again. war today is fought with hit and run tactics. its called unconventional warfare. the al quida fighters know this. so take out a far superior power u need to kill them morally. this is what they, the insurgents, are trying to do to us. the future of warfare is unconventional tactics. the world is far too devopled to allow a large scale conventional war. just my military experence and schooling 2 cents speaking here
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 12:07 AM
  #51  
E.O.D.'s Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

dont worry guy your time is coming, and im sure it will be soon. my unit has a warning order and we leave for our mob. station in january. tour is an 18 month tour in afphganistan for up to 18 months. the army is stretched so thin that the active component cannot handle it anymore, most of the units going over are reserve and guard. including those that have already been deployed for 12 months in the past 2 years. and i am in that situation. but this is what i signed on for many years ago
OPSEC ring a bell? Wouldn't be too hard for someone to find out what unit you are with, then measure the size and capabilities of the inbound force, etc.
Old Jul 26, 2005 | 07:01 AM
  #52  
PendragonZ's Avatar
Chop-Foo Director
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
From: Haymarket, Virginia
Default

OK, this is getting off topic.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE