Very nice NSX >>> Ferrari body conversion
#21
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TransAm52804
They sure as hell aren't fast either, especially for what you pay for them. $90K for a 290 HP V6 car that looks (and basically is) the exact same car it was back in 1990. Sure it turns well and is all-aluminum... $40K would be more reasonable for this car.
Yes I'm serious. It's by far the most overrated and overpriced car to come out of Jahhhpan.
Yes I'm serious. It's by far the most overrated and overpriced car to come out of Jahhhpan.
#22
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baytown/houston, tx
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
id love to have an NSX, they look super badass....280 hp at like 3200 pounds ....and chicks love them, b/c they have no clue what it is....lol
but....id **** on an NSX for and c6zo6
but....id **** on an NSX for and c6zo6
#23
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by had20z
id love to have an NSX, they look super badass....280 hp at like 3200 pounds
Sorry, I just strongly dislike the NSX. It's such a ripoff.
#24
Launching!
iTrader: (9)
Originally Posted by TransAm52804
Or there's the C5 with 350 HP at 3200 lbs, or the C6 with 400 HP at 3200 lbs: the C5 now a fraction of what the NSX costs, and the C6 half what the NSX costs, but both handling just as well if not better than the NSX, and both are much quicker/faster.
Sorry, I just strongly dislike the NSX. It's such a ripoff.
Sorry, I just strongly dislike the NSX. It's such a ripoff.
#27
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: fairfax
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mahhddgtp
I think they're eventually going to put a V8 in it, maybe making it worthwhile... But yeah, they're not too fast considering the price tag. But they stick to the ground like glue and they can ******* handle (in the NSX's defense). Even then, it's still not $90,000 worthy... Not even $70,000... Sorry! I'd take a C6Z06 over that...
#30
Originally Posted by ls1fbod
Dumb idea i think.. That body style isn't nice.
Good work by the body shop though..
Good work by the body shop though..
So, the Ferrari F50 isn't a "nice" body style? Or are you talking about this kit car, which the body looks out of proportion on, in which case I would agree with you. The Ferrari F50, however, is one of the most beautiful modern cars of all time.
#31
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 560SL
So, the Ferrari F50 isn't a "nice" body style? Or are you talking about this kit car, which the body looks out of proportion on, in which case I would agree with you. The Ferrari F50, however, is one of the most beautiful modern cars of all time.
#33
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Palolo Valley HI, or Whitter SoCal
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kornfreak_401
God Damned Chinkies!!! Puts A Real Meaning To All The **** That Says Made In China/taiwan. ******* **** Up, ******* Honda
Good craftsmanship, but as others have said, why? I was never too big a fan of conversions. Kit cars are cool, but conversions that require wrecking a doner = Talk all the **** you want about the NSX, it was still a great car for it's time. Honda did get lazy as **** and with only 2 significant updates over 14 years, sales were bound to taper off. Plus we never got the 2800 lbs. NSX-R here in the states anyway.
As for the craftsmanship though. That definitely showed that these folks had talent. Despite whether you agree or disagree with them tearing into an NSX, you can't deny that for a completely in house conversion, that was a pretty good job.