Does this look real? Bugatti Veyron take off!
05-23-2006, 09:06 PM
#21
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....4697F9A297&p=0
heres another vid
timed it 0-210 in about 9 sec!
heres another vid
timed it 0-210 in about 9 sec!
05-23-2006, 09:55 PM
#23
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats 0-210km which is 130mph.
cuz if it was 210mph in 9 seconds... that means it does the 1/4 mile quicker than 9 seconds.. more like 7-8....no way in hell this car can cover the 1/4 mile faster than 8 seconds. liter bikes have better power to weight and trap 140's. the veyron probly is a mid to low 9 second car at 140-150mph
cuz if it was 210mph in 9 seconds... that means it does the 1/4 mile quicker than 9 seconds.. more like 7-8....no way in hell this car can cover the 1/4 mile faster than 8 seconds. liter bikes have better power to weight and trap 140's. the veyron probly is a mid to low 9 second car at 140-150mph
05-23-2006, 10:48 PM
#26
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
thats 0-210km which is 130mph.
cuz if it was 210mph in 9 seconds... that means it does the 1/4 mile quicker than 9 seconds.. more like 7-8....no way in hell this car can cover the 1/4 mile faster than 8 seconds. liter bikes have better power to weight and trap 140's. the veyron probly is a mid to low 9 second car at 140-150mph
cuz if it was 210mph in 9 seconds... that means it does the 1/4 mile quicker than 9 seconds.. more like 7-8....no way in hell this car can cover the 1/4 mile faster than 8 seconds. liter bikes have better power to weight and trap 140's. the veyron probly is a mid to low 9 second car at 140-150mph
05-24-2006, 09:50 AM
#31
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They say the Veyron does 0-200 faster than the McLaren does 100-200 (it's atleast 100 MPH, maybe 120 or so). How insane is that?
if you get both cars stopped... from a dig....and let the Mclaren F1 accelerate first to 120mph BEFORE the Veyron takes off...
the veyron STILL will beat the mclaren to 200mph
insanely fast
but i'd still take the mclaren F1
05-24-2006, 12:35 PM
#33
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
i heard this version
if you get both cars stopped... from a dig....and let the Mclaren F1 accelerate first to 120mph BEFORE the Veyron takes off...
the veyron STILL will beat the mclaren to 200mph
insanely fast
but i'd still take the mclaren F1
if you get both cars stopped... from a dig....and let the Mclaren F1 accelerate first to 120mph BEFORE the Veyron takes off...
the veyron STILL will beat the mclaren to 200mph
insanely fast
but i'd still take the mclaren F1
05-27-2006, 12:49 AM
#34
Staging Lane
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tCTech
... I wouldn't be surpirsed if it COULD run against pro stock car's with a simple upgrade on turbo size.
06-15-2006, 08:42 PM
#36
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
they supposively have a GT version that has top speed of 272mph with nearly 1300hp on motor
06-15-2006, 09:48 PM
#37
Launching!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kairles
who knew VW could build such a badass car
8.0L W16 quad turbo
8.0L W16 quad turbo
OK this confused the hell out of me. That engine is a in V shape from what I can see., the W16 is just like it says, in the W shape. Isn't the W16 just the same W12 from the W12 concept with 4 more cylinders and more development.
Also, VW owns Lamborghini, Bentley, Audi, and Bugatti. Probally more too. So the 'lowest ego emissions' is very ironic.
