Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

Mach 1 (n/a) vs Turbo LS1. Surprise!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2007, 06:55 PM
  #21  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Chris Gage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sarasota & Lee County
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I'm not impressed, a built motor and only running low 12's @ 112-113 for the first set of timeslips and then 116-117 for the second set of timeslips. Do I smell spray? My bolt-on crate ls6 runs 11.8 @ 119 on 18's. I think those ls cars need the driver mod, hell I ran almost 113 with the ls1 in it and bolt-ons.
+1...... For as much as that car has in it, it should be quicker.... I am not goign to judge though, I am sure its faster now with less wieght and the juice
Old 04-27-2007, 07:52 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
slimcracka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: pensacola, fl.
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its a bad car and i wouldnt mind having a mach but damn why would you spend all that money on bolt ons nx and a stroker motor and run STOCK heads? kinda dumb but then again i know nothing about ford maybe the stock heads are the best i dono.. but if he has nx then was he using it in the vid?? na huh?
Old 04-27-2007, 07:55 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Supposedly that "turbo, heads/cam" LS1 Camaro only trapped 119MPH

Edit: That was at 7psi!

Last edited by Marc 85Z28; 04-27-2007 at 08:07 PM.
Old 04-27-2007, 08:04 PM
  #24  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
MikeG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Marc 85Z28
Supposedly that "turbo, heads/cam" LS1 Camaro only trapped 119MPH
Yeah....weak.

Lets see this guy run a cam only LS1 with a decent sized cam. None of this 22X crap. Somebody with a MS4/Vindicator/G5X4 wanna go find this guy?

As someone stated earlier, the Mach is good at picking races.

Don't get me wrong, the Stang is cool, but it isn't the end-all-be-all he's making it out to be.
Old 04-27-2007, 08:08 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MD
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeG
Yeah....weak.

Lets see this guy run a cam only LS1 with a decent sized cam. None of this 22X crap. Somebody with a MS4/Vindicator/G5X4 wanna go find this guy?

As someone stated earlier, the Mach is good at picking races.

Don't get me wrong, the Stang is cool, but it isn't the end-all-be-all he's making it out to be.
I might just hit him up. He is somewhat local. And I won't be needing a big cam to do it... my current setup has a tiny 222/222 cam.
Old 04-27-2007, 09:00 PM
  #26  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I'm not impressed, a built motor and only running low 12's @ 112-113 for the first set of timeslips and then 116-117 for the second set of timeslips. Do I smell spray? My bolt-on crate ls6 runs 11.8 @ 119 on 18's. I think those ls cars need the driver mod, hell I ran almost 113 with the ls1 in it and bolt-ons.
113 and 116 is a big difference, I am willing to bet with the bolt on ls1 you were cutting 2.0 60ft. this guy is trapping 116 with killer 1.7's thats a potential 11 sec car. 281 cubes n/a car and trapping those speeds with a 4.30 gear? Please he would have left your bolt on Camaro sitting still!
Old 04-27-2007, 09:52 PM
  #27  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
bad2000z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vestal NY
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

OK, I'm not trying to be a jerk, but a N/A 5.0 stroker 32v beating a heads/cam/twin turbo Camaro? That **** don't make sense. The Mustang has what...350-360rwhp? The supposed heads/cam/twin turbo Camaro should have been making at least 100 more rwhp, even with only 4lbs of boost. And how did the guy in the Camaro make those TT's so damn quiet? Don't take me wrong, I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm just saying it don't make no sense.........begin debate.
Old 04-27-2007, 09:55 PM
  #28  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bad2000z
OK, I'm not trying to be a jerk, but a N/A 5.0 stroker 32v beating a heads/cam/twin turbo Camaro? That **** don't make sense. The Mustang has what...350-360rwhp? The supposed heads/cam/twin turbo Camaro should have been making at least 100 more rwhp, even with only 4lbs of boost. And how did the guy in the Camaro make those TT's so damn quiet? Don't take me wrong, I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm just saying it don't make no sense.........begin debate.
I have to agree on that one!
Old 04-27-2007, 11:41 PM
  #29  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kennyxg
113 and 116 is a big difference, I am willing to bet with the bolt on ls1 you were cutting 2.0 60ft. this guy is trapping 116 with killer 1.7's thats a potential 11 sec car. 281 cubes n/a car and trapping those speeds with a 4.30 gear? Please he would have left your bolt on Camaro sitting still!
Maybe you should reread my post and go to his websight and look at all his slips and then figure out that to get to 116-117 he's probally spraying it in high gear for the mph and with 4.30 gears he's getting it all from the beginning. He would be hard pressed to beat a well driven bolt-on ls1 from a roll with no spray. All my #'s are in the sig. When I had the ls1 in it, it still had the 3.42 when it ran 112.8. Besides all my runs are on real street tires or road race tires, not slicks or drag radials so he would get killed in a real street race. Not to it does'nt run good for a n/a (??) mod motor but it is a built motor.
Old 04-27-2007, 11:55 PM
  #30  
Teching In
 
1BADChev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NOR-CAL
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tan327
Yeah, it's a shame N/A LS1 cars can't move out like that.
I CAN SHOW YOU HOW N/A LS1'S PERFORM. GREAT VIDEO. JUST DON'T BELIEVE THAT THOSE CARS WERE REALLY TURBO IF IM WRONG HEY I TIP MY HAT TO THE MACH...
Old 04-28-2007, 12:01 AM
  #31  
Teching In
 
1BADChev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NOR-CAL
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bad2000z
OK, I'm not trying to be a jerk, but a N/A 5.0 stroker 32v beating a heads/cam/twin turbo Camaro? That **** don't make sense. The Mustang has what...350-360rwhp? The supposed heads/cam/twin turbo Camaro should have been making at least 100 more rwhp, even with only 4lbs of boost. And how did the guy in the Camaro make those TT's so damn quiet? Don't take me wrong, I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm just saying it don't make no sense.........begin debate.
+1!.........
Old 04-28-2007, 12:36 AM
  #32  
On The Tree
 
iB2slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: bowling green , ky
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kennyxg
113 and 116 is a big difference, I am willing to bet with the bolt on ls1 you were cutting 2.0 60ft. this guy is trapping 116 with killer 1.7's thats a potential 11 sec car. 281 cubes n/a car and trapping those speeds with a 4.30 gear? Please he would have left your bolt on Camaro sitting still!
I thought it was a stroker the car is slow for the money spent and the chicks aint that hot so lets get on with it.
Old 04-28-2007, 02:13 AM
  #33  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
SpdFrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by iB2slow
I thought it was a stroker the car is slow for the money spent and the chicks aint that hot so lets get on with it.
Ill have to agree.
Old 04-28-2007, 02:22 AM
  #34  
On The Tree
 
iB2slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: bowling green , ky
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpdFrk1990
Ill have to agree.
I saw your post before you edited and took a 2nd look ill agree the girl in the black bikini toward the bottom is pretty hot.... just saw the pics of the 1st two and was like hell no.
Old 04-28-2007, 02:28 AM
  #35  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
SpdFrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by iB2slow
I saw your post before you edited and took a 2nd look ill agree the girl in the black bikini toward the bottom is pretty hot.... just saw the pics of the 1st two and was like hell no.
Old 04-28-2007, 02:31 AM
  #36  
On The Tree
 
verve_v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kaleva, Michigan
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If that car was TT,it was slow as ballz, and who payz the *** load of money for a TT kit and only runs 4 psi.
Old 04-28-2007, 02:41 AM
  #37  
On The Tree
 
iB2slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: bowling green , ky
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by verve_v
If that car was TT,it was slow as ballz, and who payz the *** load of money for a TT kit and only runs 4 psi.

He takes a cam only ls1 by what looked like a couple cars with a 4:30 gear and then walks a head and cam car from a roll not to mention the TT car i mean come on.
Old 04-28-2007, 02:47 AM
  #38  
Teching In
 
Johnny1827's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That Mach is a piece..!! No way he is beatin up on a TT F body. He just found a bunch of slow as rides with **** drivers and made a vid. Im sure my cammed f body would hand him his *** and then some.
Old 04-28-2007, 02:57 AM
  #39  
On The Tree
 
iB2slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: bowling green , ky
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Johnny1827
That Mach is a piece..!! No way he is beatin up on a TT F body. He just found a bunch of slow as rides with **** drivers and made a vid. Im sure my cammed f body would hand him his *** and then some.
I dont know about hand him his *** and then some but a close run depending on if its a stalled a4 or m6 on the street its anyone's ball game.
Old 04-28-2007, 05:08 AM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
 
Adam_346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good Vid, That Mach is hella nice, I've never seen anyone go that route when modding one, so that was cool. Some of the races where suspicious, but hey I wasn't there so im not gonna downgrade his wins. Cool car


Quick Reply: Mach 1 (n/a) vs Turbo LS1. Surprise!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 PM.