Calling out! Post a sick fast N/A 4.6 Mustang video
#41
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Read this:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/628613-quickest-stock-internals-list-11-79-bump.html these are just bolt-on cars, they have a few cam-only cars pushing low low 10s and heads and cam cars have made it into the 9s.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/628613-quickest-stock-internals-list-11-79-bump.html these are just bolt-on cars, they have a few cam-only cars pushing low low 10s and heads and cam cars have made it into the 9s.
#42
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Highest N/A 4.6 (stock displacement) mod motor makes about 400-420rwhp.
Highest N/A 5.4 (horrible rod ratio) mod motor makes over 600rwhp.
Cubes win in period.
-Mark
#44
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
some people get so tense, you have a more complax motor, the physical size of your engine is that of a big block and you make shitty power, bigger displacement or not. The ls1 is an all around better designed engine that makes tremendous power, unlike the modular 4.6. I bet if there was a 281 ls1 it would still make better power than the modular 4.6
#45
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not getting uptight. But its obvious you don't know the science about building motors. You just say X motor is better than Y. But you state no facts. Read up about engine building then you'll understand what we are talking about. -Mark
#46
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh i understand, i actually have a first hand experience, i had a cam only lt1, made 340 rwhp, decide to stroke it, kept the same heads because i did not have money to port yet, went from shorty headers to longtube, then dynoed the car witha 383 engine, dynoed 352 rwhp.
#50
thats not first hand experience imo , first hand experience is actually building various types of engines, ive done SBC/BBC since i was about 13, 2 SBF's and now im building a 4v mod motor, and ive helped on an ls1 and done an lt1, im not bragging but im saying thats what motor building experience is, having a broad knowledge of many engines , not just building one and automatically thinking you know every engine is the same to build , these mod motors are nothing like an lt1 or ls1, because as stated before poor boreXstroke doesn't make power, lets prove this, a 302 SBF can be made into a really quick motor on stock cubes because of the 4" bore and 3" stroke is a good match ,
moral of the story , mod motors do not suck, they just need High rpms for N/A applications to make the power because of poor design
#51
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are some stock flow#'s for modular heads. -Mark
http://www.mach1registry.org/photopo...cat=500&sort=1
http://www.mach1registry.org/photopo...cat=500&sort=1
#52
Launching!
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are some stock flow#'s for modular heads. -Mark
http://www.mach1registry.org/photopo...cat=500&sort=1
http://www.mach1registry.org/photopo...cat=500&sort=1
Cubes don't make any difference if your top end is garbage. Take my fathers 1978 Lincoln. Yeah it has a 460 but its lucky it makes I think 210 horsepower. Everything from the heads up are killing the thing.
#53
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am glad that you are out wrenching, but that is not what I would call 1st hand experience or any form of R&D.
Just to let you know, when I was planning on running a modular motor in my fastback (Prior to moving to the LS1), this was the sheetmetal intake I was going to run on the 4V setup....
This motor was going to be boosted though.
#55
Staging Lane
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: conroe/woodlands, texas
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am glad that you are out wrenching, but that is not what I would call 1st hand experience or any form of R&D.
Just to let you know, when I was planning on running a modular motor in my fastback (Prior to moving to the LS1), this was the sheetmetal intake I was going to run on the 4V setup....
This motor was going to be boosted though.
Just to let you know, when I was planning on running a modular motor in my fastback (Prior to moving to the LS1), this was the sheetmetal intake I was going to run on the 4V setup....
This motor was going to be boosted though.
#56
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the pointers, you know how to get a hold of me. Just let me know!
#57
Staging Lane
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: conroe/woodlands, texas
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it'll be a slow process but for a project like this i much prefer having things planned in advanced so i'm not choosing as i go. i'd rather know exactly what i'm saving and paying for. i will definately get in touch with you soon.
#59
12 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
all of the single digit mod motor mustangs i've read about that have gone that fast in the 1/4 mile are stroked. just like the ls1's. i haven't seen a stock cube 346ci ls2/ls6 go 9's in the 1/4. all the n/a ones have been stroker motors. not saying it can't be done though.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/749327-all-time-fastest-na-ls-any-c-i.html