Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

Calling out! Post a sick fast N/A 4.6 Mustang video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2007, 04:32 PM
  #41  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02White6.0
Read this:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/628613-quickest-stock-internals-list-11-79-bump.html these are just bolt-on cars, they have a few cam-only cars pushing low low 10s and heads and cam cars have made it into the 9s.
thank you, its not just our displacement that makes out engines superior to the n/a 4.6, it is just a damn better engine. Numbers don't lie.
plaf713 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 06:37 PM
  #42  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by plaf713
thank you, its not just our displacement that makes out engines superior to the n/a 4.6, it is just a damn better engine. Numbers don't lie.
No, its cubes. You can throw 4 valves per cylinder and have 4 cams. But having only a 3.5" bore you're still not gonna move as much air as if you had a 4" bore with a stroke that is less than the bore. A square motor (3.55x3.54) is not the best in terms of making hp. You want a bigger bore and a shorter stroke. The LSX platform makes more power is because of cubes and a better borexstroke combo. Ask yourself this.... If a modular motor had the same bore and stroke as an LSX motor do you think it would still make less hp?

Highest N/A 4.6 (stock displacement) mod motor makes about 400-420rwhp.
Highest N/A 5.4 (horrible rod ratio) mod motor makes over 600rwhp.

Cubes win in period.

-Mark
Bitemark46 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:14 PM
  #43  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
BigBronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by plaf713
thank you, its not just our displacement that makes out engines superior to the n/a 4.6, it is just a damn better engine. Numbers don't lie.
Hi. My name is reading comprehension and you have apparently missed all of my posts in this thread.
BigBronco is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:22 PM
  #44  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

some people get so tense, you have a more complax motor, the physical size of your engine is that of a big block and you make shitty power, bigger displacement or not. The ls1 is an all around better designed engine that makes tremendous power, unlike the modular 4.6. I bet if there was a 281 ls1 it would still make better power than the modular 4.6
plaf713 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:30 PM
  #45  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Not getting uptight. But its obvious you don't know the science about building motors. You just say X motor is better than Y. But you state no facts. Read up about engine building then you'll understand what we are talking about. -Mark
Bitemark46 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:36 PM
  #46  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh i understand, i actually have a first hand experience, i had a cam only lt1, made 340 rwhp, decide to stroke it, kept the same heads because i did not have money to port yet, went from shorty headers to longtube, then dynoed the car witha 383 engine, dynoed 352 rwhp.
plaf713 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:40 PM
  #47  
Launching!
iTrader: (11)
 
F8LWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Does no one make decent heads at all for the motor? What does the best set of heads flow?
F8LWS6 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 08:42 PM
  #48  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
plaf713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: schenectady, ny
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

patriot has a set of heads that flow 316 cfm for the cobra, the best ive heard of
plaf713 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 09:04 PM
  #49  
Launching!
iTrader: (11)
 
F8LWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah I just looked at them. The 2v heads don't really flow good at all (Compared with an LSx head). The 4v heads aren't that bad.
F8LWS6 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 09:04 PM
  #50  
Teching In
 
blck89rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jersey
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by plaf713
oh i understand, i actually have a first hand experience, i had a cam only lt1, made 340 rwhp, decide to stroke it, kept the same heads because i did not have money to port yet, went from shorty headers to longtube, then dynoed the car witha 383 engine, dynoed 352 rwhp.

thats not first hand experience imo , first hand experience is actually building various types of engines, ive done SBC/BBC since i was about 13, 2 SBF's and now im building a 4v mod motor, and ive helped on an ls1 and done an lt1, im not bragging but im saying thats what motor building experience is, having a broad knowledge of many engines , not just building one and automatically thinking you know every engine is the same to build , these mod motors are nothing like an lt1 or ls1, because as stated before poor boreXstroke doesn't make power, lets prove this, a 302 SBF can be made into a really quick motor on stock cubes because of the 4" bore and 3" stroke is a good match ,


moral of the story , mod motors do not suck, they just need High rpms for N/A applications to make the power because of poor design
blck89rs is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 09:14 PM
  #51  
11 Second Club
 
Bitemark46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here are some stock flow#'s for modular heads. -Mark

http://www.mach1registry.org/photopo...cat=500&sort=1
Bitemark46 is offline  
Old 11-22-2007, 09:48 PM
  #52  
Launching!
iTrader: (11)
 
F8LWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bitemark46
Here are some stock flow#'s for modular heads. -Mark

http://www.mach1registry.org/photopo...cat=500&sort=1
Thanks for the link. Those honestly are some really poor numbers. Yours is awesome though man.

Cubes don't make any difference if your top end is garbage. Take my fathers 1978 Lincoln. Yeah it has a 460 but its lucky it makes I think 210 horsepower. Everything from the heads up are killing the thing.
F8LWS6 is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 12:08 AM
  #53  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
BigBronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by plaf713
oh i understand, i actually have a first hand experience, i had a cam only lt1, made 340 rwhp, decide to stroke it, kept the same heads because i did not have money to port yet, went from shorty headers to longtube, then dynoed the car witha 383 engine, dynoed 352 rwhp.

I am glad that you are out wrenching, but that is not what I would call 1st hand experience or any form of R&D.

Just to let you know, when I was planning on running a modular motor in my fastback (Prior to moving to the LS1), this was the sheetmetal intake I was going to run on the 4V setup....












This motor was going to be boosted though.
BigBronco is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 05:06 AM
  #54  
TECH Junkie
 
Adam_346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^ thats nice
Adam_346 is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 12:26 PM
  #55  
Staging Lane
 
Apex_632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: conroe/woodlands, texas
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigBronco
I am glad that you are out wrenching, but that is not what I would call 1st hand experience or any form of R&D.

Just to let you know, when I was planning on running a modular motor in my fastback (Prior to moving to the LS1), this was the sheetmetal intake I was going to run on the 4V setup....












This motor was going to be boosted though.
did you build that yourself? so when you gonna give me some pointers on a nice h/c combo for when i do my lsX swap?
Apex_632 is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 02:13 PM
  #56  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
BigBronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 10,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Apex_632
did you build that yourself? so when you gonna give me some pointers on a nice h/c combo for when i do my lsX swap?
I had picked it up from a guy who had John Beck build the manifold. It was originally supposed to go on an 03 cobra in Houston.


As for the pointers, you know how to get a hold of me. Just let me know!
BigBronco is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 04:23 PM
  #57  
Staging Lane
 
Apex_632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: conroe/woodlands, texas
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigBronco
I had picked it up from a guy who had John Beck build the manifold. It was originally supposed to go on an 03 cobra in Houston.


As for the pointers, you know how to get a hold of me. Just let me know!
it'll be a slow process but for a project like this i much prefer having things planned in advanced so i'm not choosing as i go. i'd rather know exactly what i'm saving and paying for. i will definately get in touch with you soon.
Apex_632 is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 05:48 PM
  #58  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
1fastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: central coast, cali
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bitemark46
But you have to give credit where its due. To run low 9's with less than 330 cubes is pretty impressive. -Mark
Very True!! Mach 1's are N/A and hang with ls1's and thats pretty impressive.
1fastz is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 07:06 PM
  #59  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (48)
 
quiet_storm98's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,017
Received 20 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Apex_632
all of the single digit mod motor mustangs i've read about that have gone that fast in the 1/4 mile are stroked. just like the ls1's. i haven't seen a stock cube 346ci ls2/ls6 go 9's in the 1/4. all the n/a ones have been stroker motors. not saying it can't be done though.
there are stock cubed na ls1's in the 9's..futral motorsports built one and there is also another one on this list
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/749327-all-time-fastest-na-ls-any-c-i.html
quiet_storm98 is offline  
Old 11-23-2007, 08:12 PM
  #60  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
bigwoode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1bdBULLITT
What are you smoking?? What is it that the 4.6s have that the LSx doesnt have??? Mustang owners pull that card because its a fact not because its an excuse! Lets compare your LS1 to the new LS7 and you would see there is just no comparison, cubes win N/A.
i wouldnt say that.. compression means alot, i had a 77 trans am with a 400 ci block, thing didnt move for ****. more ci doesnt mean more power
bigwoode is offline  


Quick Reply: Calling out! Post a sick fast N/A 4.6 Mustang video



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.