New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: ?
Yes the 01-02's are faster
14
46.67%
No an LS1 is an LS1
16
53.33%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

98 SS/WS6 vs 00-02

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2009, 02:44 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by frankmarroquin
Yes the older LS1 have larger cams but the newer Ls1 cam out with 241 heads and LS6 Intake but ofcourse the smaller cam. But If you ver plan on upgrading cams on the newer cars it will be off a better platform. Better flowing heads and intake
How much better do the heads flow? My guess is not much.
Old 06-07-2009, 01:53 AM
  #22  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeWS6
Yeah probably. Some are just faster than others from the factory. Or one could just have a more experienced driver.
exactly.. year/make does not matter..

Originally Posted by MikeWS6
98-00 ws6/ss models were actually 320 and 01-02 were rated at 325.
all should have been rated at 350...

http://camaroforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7681

i have that entire article somewhere.. picture and everything.... i get a kick out of it..

Originally Posted by slayerized6
ram air does not make an engine 'better'. it may add 5-10 real hp at 120mph, but it sure as hell isnt going to make your engine 'better.'
it wouldnt even add 5-10 hp, not even at 120mph.. its been proven..

also explain to me how that ram air helps on a stationary object... (ie. the dyno)

Originally Posted by frankmarroquin
Yes the older LS1 have larger cams but the newer Ls1 cam out with 241 heads and LS6 Intake but ofcourse the smaller cam. But If you ver plan on upgrading cams on the newer cars it will be off a better platform. Better flowing heads and intake
none of thats going to make a difference at all on a new car..

the ls6 intake is the only one you will benefit from once you start building.. and thats minimal also... the heads you wont even notice.

Originally Posted by MikeWS6
How much better do the heads flow? My guess is not much.
and you would be guessing spot on..
Old 06-07-2009, 02:01 AM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
THE-HOWARD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: des plaines IL
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok then my a 2000 ws6 whith 241 heads then i should have the same cam as the 98-99 or do i have the cam for the 01-02 i just asking because mine was a late year 2000
Old 06-07-2009, 02:12 AM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by THE-HOWARD
ok then my a 2000 ws6 whith 241 heads then i should have the same cam as the 98-99 or do i have the cam for the 01-02 i just asking because mine was a late year 2000
only 98s came with the hair larger cam.. you have the 99+ cam..

but like i said, none of that really matters.. they all run about the same... a stock 98 273 base model fully loaded trans am could be faster than an 02 z28 stripper with 323s... is it likely, no.. but could and i am sure has happened..

depends on the driver/individual car (notice i didnt say year or make)/track prep/tires/condition of car/ etc etc etc..
Old 06-07-2009, 08:43 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
 
LS1W66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Is this the article your talking about Lemons ?



F-body Cams
`98-00 ; 198/209 .500/.500 119.5 LSA
`01-02 ; 196/207 .467/.479 116 LSA

BTW the change to the 6.0 truck cam in `01 was done more so to help eliminate the EGR because of it's tighter lobe spread.

The biggest difference in heads is the casting process witch gave the later heads a smoother port surface. Everything else is the same and any power increase is neglidgeable.
Old 06-07-2009, 03:45 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1W66
Is this the article your talking about Lemons ?



F-body Cams
`98-00 ; 198/209 .500/.500 119.5 LSA
`01-02 ; 196/207 .467/.479 116 LSA

BTW the change to the 6.0 truck cam in `01 was done more so to help eliminate the EGR because of it's tighter lobe spread.

The biggest difference in heads is the casting process witch gave the later heads a smoother port surface. Everything else is the same and any power increase is neglidgeable.
sure is man.. i looked on my comp for about 10 minutes last night... have it saved somewhere, but i got so much **** its ridiculous..

thanks..
Old 06-07-2009, 04:08 PM
  #27  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Quik Sand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmond, Ok
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1W66
Is this the article your talking about Lemons ?



F-body Cams
`98-00 ; 198/209 .500/.500 119.5 LSA
`01-02 ; 196/207 .467/.479 116 LSA
Good stuff
Old 06-07-2009, 04:18 PM
  #28  
Deranged Rat Fink
iTrader: (3)
 
badjuju342's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Right here at my laptop, DUH!
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

One thing that is a BIGGIE here: The '97-'98 block has an inferior oilling system compared to 99+ . GM did some major revisions between '98 and '99 . Yes I know the F-body did not have the LS1 in 1997 but the Corvette did.
Old 06-07-2009, 05:03 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
00SS6spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are little differences between just about ALL years from 98-02 ranging from intakes, cams, heads, emissions, gas tanks, computers...
Old 06-07-2009, 05:22 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by badjuju342
One thing that is a BIGGIE here: The '97-'98 block has an inferior oilling system compared to 99+ . GM did some major revisions between '98 and '99 . Yes I know the F-body did not have the LS1 in 1997 but the Corvette did.
this is true..
Old 06-07-2009, 06:11 PM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
raysadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So does the oiling system matter much in terms of performance of these cars? 98 vs 99-02
Old 06-07-2009, 06:13 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by raysadude
So does the oiling system matter much in terms of performance of these cars? 98 vs 99-02
it could... or it could not..

oil getting in spots where it shouldnt be (intake, etc etc etc) is never good...

most of the time though there is no hindrance in performance.. mines a 98 and its done perfect for me..
Old 06-07-2009, 06:35 PM
  #33  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
raysadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Mines 98 too just want to make sure that I didn't make a wrong decision by taking 98 ss over 2001 z28
Old 06-07-2009, 08:42 PM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by raysadude
Mines 98 too just want to make sure that I didn't make a wrong decision by taking 98 ss over 2001 z28
nah, you should be good man..
Old 06-08-2009, 12:28 PM
  #35  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
brians91formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my Car put down 333rhp and 333tq on a Mustang Dyno with just a slp loudmouth cat back and an MTI Lid. This was with no tune. pretty good eh?
Old 06-09-2009, 12:13 AM
  #36  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brians91formula
my Car put down 333rhp and 333tq on a Mustang Dyno with just a slp loudmouth cat back and an MTI Lid. This was with no tune. pretty good eh?
yea man, good numbers.. got any times?
Old 06-09-2009, 07:03 AM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
raysadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
yea man, good numbers.. got any times?
i think the times is in his sig.
Old 06-09-2009, 09:37 AM
  #38  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
brians91formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

times in my sig are from when I was bone stock. Should be around a high 12 however.
Old 06-09-2009, 02:04 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
raysadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: edmond,ok
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brians91formula
times in my sig are from when I was bone stock. Should be around a high 12 however.
any idea how much difference between mustang dyno and dynojet?
Old 06-09-2009, 03:37 PM
  #40  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by raysadude
any idea how much difference between mustang dyno and dynojet?
10-15ish... dont know exactly... just a guess..




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.