Factory LS6 Fbody?
#82
Originally Posted by CRAGER
and it took you how many cubic inches to do that ??? impressive numbers but come on now , i said apples to apples , not mice to gorilla
#84
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burleson/Ftw,Texas
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Our naturally aspirated rear-wheel power numbers following the last round of bolt-ons were 259 hp at 5,000 rpm and 314 lb-ft at 3,900 rpm. Looking at area under the curve, NA power from 2,300 to 5,400 rpm averaged 210 hp and 287 lb-ft. With the best Superchips tune-up, the Novi 1000 gave us peaks of 337 hp at 5,000 rpm and 384 lb-ft at 4,300 rpm; average power from 2,300 to 5,400 was 259 hp and 346 lb-ft. The supercharger created rear-wheel power gains of 78 hp and 70 lb-ft at peak, and 49 hp and 59 lb-ft on average, exceeding Paxton's claims of 360 hp and 390 lb-ft at the flywheel. All these numbers were generated with an intake-manifold temperature of 120 degrees as indicated by a Raytek infrared temp gun."
AND THATS ON A BULLIT STANG, and that 360 is fly no rwhp, U have a POdunk stang. They THOUGHT they were gonna see 370 but u know what that DIDNt just like ur stang wont.
AND THATS ON A BULLIT STANG, and that 360 is fly no rwhp, U have a POdunk stang. They THOUGHT they were gonna see 370 but u know what that DIDNt just like ur stang wont.
#85
Originally Posted by 2002BLGT
Ill have mine tuesday , meanwhile where is yours ?? or you too embarrased to post it
I'm not going to be baited into your crappy little girl's game of "show me, show me". You show what you got, then you have the right to ask everyone else.
Until then:
How do you like being ? You must be used to it driving that GT of yours...
#86
Originally Posted by Ravenous T\A
"Our naturally aspirated rear-wheel power numbers following the last round of bolt-ons were 259 hp at 5,000 rpm and 314 lb-ft at 3,900 rpm. Looking at area under the curve, NA power from 2,300 to 5,400 rpm averaged 210 hp and 287 lb-ft. With the best Superchips tune-up, the Novi 1000 gave us peaks of 337 hp at 5,000 rpm and 384 lb-ft at 4,300 rpm; average power from 2,300 to 5,400 was 259 hp and 346 lb-ft. The supercharger created rear-wheel power gains of 78 hp and 70 lb-ft at peak, and 49 hp and 59 lb-ft on average, exceeding Paxton's claims of 360 hp and 390 lb-ft at the flywheel. All these numbers were generated with an intake-manifold temperature of 120 degrees as indicated by a Raytek infrared temp gun."
AND THATS ON A BULLIT STANG, and that 360 is fly no rwhp, U have a POdunk stang. They THOUGHT they were gonna see 370 but u know what that DIDNt just like ur stang wont.
AND THATS ON A BULLIT STANG, and that 360 is fly no rwhp, U have a POdunk stang. They THOUGHT they were gonna see 370 but u know what that DIDNt just like ur stang wont.
i dont know who tuned that car , but if they new what they were doing they would have seen atleast 360 to 370 rwhp ,
#89
Originally Posted by Tranzor_Z28
You have nothing but excuses as to why you can't do the same thing you're asking everyone else to do.
I'm not going to be baited into your crappy little girl's game of "show me, show me". You show what you got, then you have the right to ask everyone else.
Until then:
How do you like being ? You must be used to it driving that GT of yours...
I'm not going to be baited into your crappy little girl's game of "show me, show me". You show what you got, then you have the right to ask everyone else.
Until then:
How do you like being ? You must be used to it driving that GT of yours...
you guys dont give up do you , ill leave now so you can jack off , meanwhile ill post back on here tuesday with my numbers on my STOCK Gt 281 cubic inches , and dare any of you to compare cubic inch to HP ratio blown or not .
later *******
#90
STF Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 281cu2v
I just love to watch GM owners get all buttered up because they've beaten a Ford that is packing anywhere from 50-70 less cubic inches.
Why don't you run a supercharged LS1.
I know why because you would get
#91
Originally Posted by Jamie33
just stop posting...you cant talk sense with these people, all you can is beat their *** when you see them in person....
lock it down
lock it down
bring your *** on dude if you think you can beat my ***
#92
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burleson/Ftw,Texas
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your just pissed cause when U go to dyno your gonna get a big let down, I'll race anything, just havent had one pull up next to me(COBRA) Ive race lightnings, and I havent lost yet but one day I might just gonna take the right one. And your little wusstange gonna need more then a SC to make it quick, maybe your mom pushing will help.
#93
((((((Administrator))))))
Originally Posted by 2002BLGT
and it took you how many cubic inches to do that ??? impressive numbers but come on now , i said apples to apples , not mice to gorilla
Peace,
Craig.
#95
Originally Posted by 2002BLGT
you guys dont give up do you , ill leave now so you can jack off , meanwhile ill post back on here tuesday with my numbers on my STOCK Gt 281 cubic inches , and dare any of you to compare cubic inch to HP ratio blown or not .
later *******
later *******
Oh and don't come back until you have your own dyno sheets and time slips to back yourself up with.
Until then you're nothing but flatulence... hot wind with nothing but behind it.
#97
Originally Posted by CRAGER
I really don't get what you meant. Cubic inches to do what? 515RWHP? I'd love to see a Mustang come close to that with no power adder. And thanks for the compliment, gorilla's! lol
Peace,
Craig.
Peace,
Craig.
If ford put a 5.4 in the mustang and someone made a 427 strocker kit for it , im sure you would see atleast the same HP at the rear wheels if not more because of the advantage of not dealing with pushrods
#98
Originally Posted by Tranzor_Z28
Awwww... I guess he's taking his little pony and going home.
Oh and don't come back until you have your own dyno sheets and time slips to back yourself up with.
Until then you're nothing but flatulence... hot wind with nothing but behind it.
Oh and don't come back until you have your own dyno sheets and time slips to back yourself up with.
Until then you're nothing but flatulence... hot wind with nothing but behind it.
and i see you are still too embarrased to post your numbers so SHUT UP punk ***
#99
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2002BLGT
If ford put a 5.4 in the mustang and someone made a 427 strocker kit for it , im sure you would see atleast the same HP at the rear wheels if not more because of the advantage of not dealing with pushrods
you are gay
#100
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dude....compare a stock 2002 GT HP to a stock LS1, not your BLOWN numbers to a stock LS1.
Oh wait...we have more cubes... :::rolling eyes bigtime::: Do you cry yourself to sleep at night too? Because you sure are a whiney lil tard on here.
**This coming from someone who has owned TWO GT's**
Oh wait...we have more cubes... :::rolling eyes bigtime::: Do you cry yourself to sleep at night too? Because you sure are a whiney lil tard on here.
**This coming from someone who has owned TWO GT's**