92 FAST Ported vs. Carb Intake W/ Elbow
11-24-2013, 09:36 AM
#2
Although I've not used either one...plenty people on here claim that the
elbow poses quite a restriction. They suggest a 4150 TB on the open plenum
intake and then a custom cam to take advantage of the short runner design.
From what I've read the FAST92 is a great piece...better than the LS6 by at
least 12-15 hp yet not quite as large as the 102 which is more of an all out
top dog performer.
elbow poses quite a restriction. They suggest a 4150 TB on the open plenum
intake and then a custom cam to take advantage of the short runner design.
From what I've read the FAST92 is a great piece...better than the LS6 by at
least 12-15 hp yet not quite as large as the 102 which is more of an all out
top dog performer.
11-24-2013, 01:58 PM
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 102/102 on one of my cars, and a ported 92/92 on the other, looking to upgrade, maybe a sheet metal intake, Vic jr/elbow, or keeping it the way it is.
