View Poll Results: Which would you choose if you liked them both the same?
1999 with 20k miles
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar2-l.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar2.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar2-r.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/clear.gif)
28
47.46%
2002 with 46k miles
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar3-l.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar3.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/polls/bar3-r.gif)
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/clear.gif)
31
52.54%
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll
Newer with more miles? Or older with less miles?
#21
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
just depends its like a 18 year old ***** and a 22 year old virgin, even if one has more miles than the other you dont know how hard those few miles have been driven. you dont know if they drove it like they stole it in those 20k miles, hell for all you know they could have been going WOT at every stop light like i do! i also read more better things about the 02 not being such a bitch to tune, i mean all hte 98/99 people are upgrading their ECU's to 02's....that should tell you something.
#23
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 2002 with more miles is worth more and will sell easy. Cars lose value more by the year than miles. IMO its stupid. If it were a 40k difference i would go with the 99 but its not. When you go look and drive both cars you will know. If its THE ONE,you will know.Buy the one you like best and not what other vote on. It will be your baby..
#24
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: brandon, ms
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i agree^^^, and a car was made to do one thing, get you from point a to point b. its just camaro's will get you there a little faster, so please dont worry about mileage and get out there and drive!
#25
10 Second Club
iTrader: (63)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mpe488
both seem like good buys. I might favor the 46,000 mile car because 20,000 miles over 8 years jsut seems kinda weird to me. Thats a case of potential odometer rollback.
Yes, they are both garage queens.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
As far as the guy who would pick 25K lower miles over a 3 year newer car, I'd be with you as long as some other factors applied. If the '99 was a pampered garage queen, then sure. If it sat outside in the elements, even if it wasn't driven, then the fact it's 3 years older would be a big negative.