gto ls1 and F bod ls1...
#21
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's 290 at the rear wheels. The 350hp rating is at the flywheel. Seems about right to me.
I would say its about correct.
#22
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Benjamin Russick
The 305HP rating for the F-body is a joke...
#24
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 99camarosupersport
How do you figure? Maybe they were rating RWHP.....most fbodies i would bet are going to dyno in that range. They aren't 390hp factory monsters. nor are they 350rwhp factory monsters.
#25
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Benjamin Russick
No manufacturer has ever rated their cars HP at the wheels. The F-bodys were listed at 305HP to keep from treading on the Corvette's hallowed ground of 350HP. It was all marketing and pretty much a joke when you consider that both the F and Y bodys dyno the same (with the F-body often dynoing higher due to less drivetrain loss).
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#26
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 99camarosupersport
Yes i realize for marketing this is why the ratings were done, and i realize rating cars to the fly always yields higher numbers ala more sales, but sometimes cars are underrated for reasons, this one being marketing. Take the 03-04 cobras 390 rating for example, They will put that and more to the wheels. So you can't say they don't rate cars with RWHP, that's basically what they did with the Fbody
. My point is, show me a ls1 that dyno's 350 off the showroom floor....they are rated at 305, and that's what they dyno ( to the wheels ) so how is it a joke.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#28
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 99camarosupersport
Yes i realize for marketing this is why the ratings were done, and i realize rating cars to the fly always yields higher numbers ala more sales, but sometimes cars are underrated for reasons, this one being marketing. Take the 03-04 cobras 390 rating for example, They will put that and more to the wheels. So you can't say they don't rate cars with RWHP, that's basically what they did with the Fbody
. My point is, show me a ls1 that dyno's 350 off the showroom floor....they are rated at 305, and that's what they dyno ( to the wheels ) so how is it a joke.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
There are some cars who are under-rated from the factory for advertsiing, insurance, etc.
They dont rate cars with RWHP, their is a current standard in the market(POWER at the Crank). GM does not measure any of their other cars' HP at the crank.
Underrated cars come from all manufacturers but they are few and far between.
#29
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 99camarosupersport
Yes i realize for marketing this is why the ratings were done, and i realize rating cars to the fly always yields higher numbers ala more sales, but sometimes cars are underrated for reasons, this one being marketing. Take the 03-04 cobras 390 rating for example, They will put that and more to the wheels. So you can't say they don't rate cars with RWHP, that's basically what they did with the Fbody
. My point is, show me a ls1 that dyno's 350 off the showroom floor....they are rated at 305, and that's what they dyno ( to the wheels ) so how is it a joke.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#30
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA (Pittsburg)
Posts: 4,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I drove a co-workers 04 gto m6 last week and it felt really smooth. My SS feels faster but the GTO is very comfortable. We're suppose to race soon. His GTO just has intake.