New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

what gas should i use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2006, 05:56 PM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
 
Runn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tranås, Sweden
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by VIP1
A few reasons...
* The LS1 was not designed or tuned for it.
* Read my most above, #24 (its only a brief overview)
OK. maybe in the future.
Old 01-02-2007, 07:53 AM
  #42  
Launching!
 
johnnybravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hoosier Daddy....
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SILVER2000WS6T/A
Is Sunoco 94 still around? It was here in New Jersey. Now all I can find is Sunoco 93. Did they stop making it?
Yes, 94 is still around. At least here in northern Indiana. It's usually 5 to 7 cents more than 93.
Old 01-02-2007, 10:04 AM
  #43  
Banned
iTrader: (45)
 
lsx24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We have 93 here in NC so that's what I use. Out in CA there was only 91. The higher octane ratings are nice if you can find them.
Old 01-02-2007, 11:25 PM
  #44  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
greysteel_M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've switched to 9x since reading this thread
Old 01-03-2007, 05:46 PM
  #45  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Rede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Grande Prairie, AB. That's Canada you hoser.
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BriancWS6
Where-ever you heard that, please don't EVER go back there

I will tell you what WILL do damage though, and that's running a low octane and getting detonation. Higher octane means it's more resistant to pre-igniting. If you have too low of an octane rating for what you need, as the piston moves up on the compression stroke some of the fuel starts to ignite before the sparkplug fires, while the piston is still traveling up...NOT good.
The other big myth is that adding otane boost give you more power

It'll give you more power over 87 octane... if you're using a lower grade than what is suppoer to be ran in it.
The tighter the timming, the more octane you'll need in the fuel to keep it from knocking and detonating. And that dosen't meen you need c-12 soon as you do a few things either.

We have 91 only here.
The Mohawk/Husky has some 92 premium+ ethanol blend, but its not really worth it since I'm burning more compaired to 91 gasoline @ WOT.

Last edited by Rede; 01-03-2007 at 06:42 PM.
Old 01-03-2007, 06:06 PM
  #46  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Rede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Grande Prairie, AB. That's Canada you hoser.
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Runn
Why not go with E85?
The ethonal fuels have higher octane rating, but the fuel burns with less btu output.

Check out november's issue for the E85 review in Car Craft:

The numbers tell us the story. One gallon of ethanol is worth 76,000 btus, while gasoline is around 114,000 btus. E85 is created by adding 15% gasoline to ethanol, which ups the heat count to roughly 83,000 btus per gallon. By way of compairison, methanol generates a mere 56,800 btus per gallon, or almost exactly hlf the btus of gasoline. This meens that roughly 27% less heat output per gallon that gasoline. This is partly why we must burn around 25-30% more E85 (at WOT) compared with gasoline to achive similar results.
Because we have to burn more E85 than gasoline to make the same amount of heat in the combustion chamber, E85 is cuyrrently not the dashing hero as an alternative daily-driver fuel.
In short, it burns less hot than gasoline, so you'll be looking at burning 25-30% more at WOT.

Ethanol fuel is also subsidizied by the government as much as 50 cents per gallon, so if ethanol fuel use increases sharply, expect 'the man' to yank the subsidy to cash in.
Old 01-03-2007, 06:06 PM
  #47  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NHRAMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver,[KITSILANO].B.C. Canada *WestCoast*
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

MINIMUM 89 OCTANE.......We have 94 here everywhere....
Old 01-03-2007, 06:37 PM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
02NHRAtransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nothing but 91 here (damn Ca) wish i could get 93
Old 01-04-2007, 12:12 PM
  #49  
Staging Lane
 
Spoyld029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have had to use 89 for a few tanks of gas when I was in northwest Iowa for two weeks because there were simply no gas stations within 40 miles that had anything higher than 89. I use 94 now at the Sunoco stations and 93 at the other stations.
Old 01-04-2007, 12:57 PM
  #50  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1WICKDZ
91 where i am at. miss the 93
Originally Posted by 02NHRAtransAm
nothing but 91 here (damn Ca) wish i could get 93
i hate statements like this because there is no truth to it. octane is NOT a power adder, it's a combustion retardant. your car on a stock tune WILL NOT fair ANY better on 93 octane than 91 octane. 91 octane has a higher energy content than 93 octane since less combustion retardant is used. this means that there is actually a HIGHER energy potential in 91 octane than 93 octane on a stock tune.

the only way 93 octane will benefit you over 91 octane is if your car was custom tuned and more timing was added, or you're running higher than stock compression. again, on a stock tune with stock compression, 93 octane IS NOT better than 91 octane. if you feel a difference, it's in your head. if you see a difference in mpg, it's because you were specifically looking for a difference and driving accordingly to make the difference happen.

so many people have no idea what octane is. run 91 octane. if it is not available, run 93 octane. nothing less than 91 - EVER, unless you have absolutely no choice because it's not offered.

as for Spoyld029, you're totally wasting your money using 94 octane. there's no point to it. there's a ~$0.20/gallon difference between 91 and 94 octane. it's pointless.
Old 01-04-2007, 01:06 PM
  #51  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (68)
 
ICRAZY6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lacon, IL
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I just use premium. Usually 91 but if theres only 93 or 89 octane I use the higher.
Old 01-04-2007, 01:12 PM
  #52  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
tim99ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
i hate statements like this because there is no truth to it. octane is NOT a power adder, it's a combustion retardant. your car on a stock tune WILL NOT fair ANY better on 93 octane than 91 octane. 91 octane has a higher energy content than 93 octane since less combustion retardant is used. this means that there is actually a HIGHER energy potential in 91 octane than 93 octane on a stock tune.

the only way 93 octane will benefit you over 91 octane is if your car was custom tuned and more timing was added, or you're running higher than stock compression. again, on a stock tune with stock compression, 93 octane IS NOT better than 91 octane. if you feel a difference, it's in your head. if you see a difference in mpg, it's because you were specifically looking for a difference and driving accordingly to make the difference happen.

so many people have no idea what octane is. run 91 octane. if it is not available, run 93 octane. nothing less than 91 - EVER, unless you have absolutely no choice because it's not offered.

as for Spoyld029, you're totally wasting your money using 94 octane. there's no point to it. there's a ~$0.20/gallon difference between 91 and 94 octane. it's pointless.


Old 01-04-2007, 01:16 PM
  #53  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (19)
 
Ericbigmac83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Owings, Md
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

93 all the way, its stupid to worry about saving a buck if the risk is blowing up a $5k engine
Old 01-04-2007, 01:24 PM
  #54  
TECH Fanatic
 
Runn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tranås, Sweden
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Funny thing in sweden we dont have any gas lower than 91, But most people go with 94 or 95 and of course E85.
Old 01-04-2007, 01:27 PM
  #55  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
 
grifter757's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I always use 93 no mater what.
Old 01-31-2007, 07:18 PM
  #56  
Staging Lane
 
rob c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal:Inland Empire
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Only 91 Octane out here. Learned from a guy that sold VP Racing fuel that over the counter fuels from the Big Oil Guys was tested a few years ago, right after Cali required that reduced octane (93 to 91) be sold, and Unocal 76 was still at 93, though the pump read 91. Seems they didnt want to reformulate...Im not sure if that was a temporary thing, and its since been reduced. Or he was full of BS. Dunno, but I use primarily Unocal 76 since then. As for the difference between 87 and 91 octane. You will see a difference in how the car performs and runs. Years ago, my wifes V6 Camaro, and also her Lexus RX300 were both supposed to run on 87 octane. Says the dealer and the manual. Not! Service engine lights came on both; the RX300 on two different times. The V6 ran fine on 89 octane, and the RX300 isnt happy unless its got 91. Its sluggish, and idles funny on 89.
Old 01-31-2007, 07:34 PM
  #57  
Launching!
 
5PONT7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: VA
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run midgrade. which is 89 and my cars been running fine. I have a few friends who work at GM and in auto shops and they told me that Premium would eventually burn out the spark plugs and midgrade would give the same performance, that the whole 93 thing is a myth
Old 01-31-2007, 08:09 PM
  #58  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5PONT7
I run midgrade. which is 89 and my cars been running fine. I have a few friends who work at GM and in auto shops and they told me that Premium would eventually burn out the spark plugs and midgrade would give the same performance, that the whole 93 thing is a myth
93 is a myth. 91 is not. the manual recommends 91. 89 won't kill you, but 91 isn't going to burn out your spark plugs. maybe if you're running race gas it will, but let's not be ridiculous here. the best octane to run in our cars is 91. 89 is too little, 93 is too much. it's not a huge difference, but in the long run, 91 is better. at least that's my opinion.
Old 01-31-2007, 11:25 PM
  #59  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 7,336
Received 72 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Please do not use anything other than 93. The cheap stuff will have your car running like a 4 cylinder. Gas mileage and power is increased with 93. I only use shell or exxon.
Old 01-31-2007, 11:33 PM
  #60  
Teching In
 
LT1_ownr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dude I can't even believe some people ask this. If you have a high performance car that is factory tuned to run 91+ octane then do it. I used to run 87 in my old turbo eclipse and switched to 93 and noticed an IMMEDIATE change in performance. Stick the expensive stuff. It's an expensive car to have...might as well bite the bullitt..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.