pacesetter vs flowtech longtube headers
06-12-2007, 01:07 PM
#21
Originally Posted by BriancWS6
I've had both. My previous car I tried the Flowtechs cause they were basically a more affordable Hooker. After going with the Pacesetters on my current car, I have been able to see all the differences.
Flowtechs are made from thinner material, have thinner, weaker flanges, and the O2 bungs are on the outside vs inside for the Pacesetters. This made them extremely close to the floorboards of the car.
Between these two, Pacesetters hands down.
Flowtechs are made from thinner material, have thinner, weaker flanges, and the O2 bungs are on the outside vs inside for the Pacesetters. This made them extremely close to the floorboards of the car.
Between these two, Pacesetters hands down.
06-12-2007, 01:45 PM
#22
Banned
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chitown
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'd personally go with pace-setters over flowtechs... but right now, SpeedInc is selling Hooker long-tubes coated for $399.99 SHIPPED!!!
www.ls1speed.com
www.ls1speed.com
06-12-2007, 09:27 PM
#24
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not to thread-jack, but what will be the difference, other than fitment/price, between the different LT companies? i know the O2 bung placements and fitment are 2 major points of interest when looking at companies, but what about performance?
whats to persuade me from buying brand "Z" LTs, which happen to be an extra $400 over brand "A" LTs? (given the fact that both are the same coating)
whats to persuade me from buying brand "Z" LTs, which happen to be an extra $400 over brand "A" LTs? (given the fact that both are the same coating)
