Most RWHP on stock cam, naturally aspirated...
#44
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: bentonville, arkansas
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there is a bolt-on that can get you 150rwhp to 200rwhp and up to 200rwtq. that would put you at up to 500rwhp on a stock motor with 1 bolt-on. it is also well under $1K! the name of this wonderful invention is nitrous oxide. a 150hp shot is completely safe for a stock motor if it is done right and can possibly add up 200rwhp with the right bottle pressure. it is by far the best bolt-on and best bang for your buck!
#45
I've had 2002 Z28's make very good rwhp on our Mustand MD1100SE dyno. One was a bolt on M6, headers, lid, catback, tune, make 365rwhp, an another A4 with headers, lid, catback, and tune make 358rwhp. Either of those on a DynoJet would be in the 370-380rwhp range.
#46
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Chicago Subs
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine did 344/361 with just a lid and cat-back and some free mods. It also ran a 12.18@113 on a DR at 3500lbs and with 4.11s and LCAs. I should have left it SI to see what it would do with full bolt-ons and a tune.
#49
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lafayette/West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very impressive numbers. Me with my converter unlocked and with a guy that i don't think did the run right came out with a whopping 313 . Track times are good though, so I'm happy. lol
#50
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
I would prefer the stock cam because it would yield good mileage for an everyday driver. I'd say a 370 rwhp LS1 swapped in my 88 Vette would probably break into low 12s or high 11s and probably get like 32 mpg on a cruise. I'd love to keep my automatic and 3.07 stock gears though... I drive this car everyday 30 miles to and from work round trip.
Gearing also has a big impact on MPG as well and your stock 3.07 will work better with a car that makes gives up some top end for more low end power.
So what are some track numbers and perhaps trap speeds with the stock cam?
In the 1/8th mile, I've seen 8.2 @ 88 mph on a stock cam N/A "stripper" yet full bolt on automatic Camaro Z28.
Very impressive for even a stock cam, stock sounding 600 rpm idle with only something like a 200/200 duration @ about a .500/.500 lift, 117 LSA... :thumbs:
Pretty wicked compared to a small block with a radical sounding 230/230 cam, .550/.550 lift, 111 LSA.
But the LS1 car also gets a ton better gas mileage.
In the 1/8th mile, I've seen 8.2 @ 88 mph on a stock cam N/A "stripper" yet full bolt on automatic Camaro Z28.
Very impressive for even a stock cam, stock sounding 600 rpm idle with only something like a 200/200 duration @ about a .500/.500 lift, 117 LSA... :thumbs:
Pretty wicked compared to a small block with a radical sounding 230/230 cam, .550/.550 lift, 111 LSA.
But the LS1 car also gets a ton better gas mileage.
Here's a video of a 6 speed WS6 with less than $1000 in mods including tires.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5InYumz3eA4
That's by no means out of the ordinary.
The difference with Civics is that they have no power so the manuals don't do stupid **** like V8 cars out of the hole. So even with a bad launch they won't be that far behind an equivalent auto but the extra power that they put down more than makes up for it on the big end.
#51
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My friend yesterday trapped 85-87 mph in the 1/8th mile yesterday as a full bolt-on 6-speed car. Pretty wicked for a car with just 4.11 gears and all the other free bolt-ons.
I'm definitely liking the way LS1 out-perform old Gen 1 small blocks in just about every aspect...
I'm definitely liking the way LS1 out-perform old Gen 1 small blocks in just about every aspect...
#52
TECH Resident
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why waste your $ on bolt on's when you can just get head and cam set up? A exhaust and intake is probably going to cost $700 before install. Its possible to get a head/cam set up for under $2k
#54
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
Who cares if the stock valvetrain can make it to 200,000 miles if you replace the valvetrain at 100,000 with aftermarket stuff. If you're fine with running a little slower as a full bolt on car, so be it. But that's the worst reason I've heard yet for not doing a cam.
Jon
Jon
#57
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know this is a 15 month old thread but I'm in the low-mid 8s @ 88-89 mph in the 1/8th mile. I'm so happy I bought this car... Makes me never want to go back to a small block...
#58
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gulfport, MS / Columbus, OH
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i would go with full bolt ons + head and cam lol, go to www.texas-speed.com and look at there head and cam packages for N/A i like the 5.3 heads with the MS3 cam
#59
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read throught this whole thing and didn't even notice the dates till this post lol. Glad you made the switch and congrats on the times, thats a great trap speed. Oh btw, mod for mod, autos aren't always quicker