two bottles vs. nano....

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 6, 2009 | 09:15 AM

#21

Robert56

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 9,557

Likes: 1

From: Tacoma, WA

Yes, individual cylinder tuning is nice for sure, espec when going big.
Robert

Jan 6, 2009 | 09:20 AM

#22

SmurfLSX

Banned

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 401

Likes: 0

From: New York

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackScreaminMachine

Good for you.

so why recommend something that will potentially destroy a transmission ? I'm lost here. I would definately go with a nano setup if i were running nitrous.

Jan 6, 2009 | 09:41 AM

#23

BlackScreaminMachine

Internet Mechanic

iTrader: (17)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 9,830

Likes: 2

From: Wallingford CT

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuscleLs1Power

so why recommend something that will potentially destroy a transmission ? I'm lost here. I would definately go with a nano setup if i were running nitrous.

On a M6, it would not destroy a transmission, if it were frag it would be on the launch at a 6k clutch dump. Putting the clutch in and slipping it in Neutral would be fine

On any given auto, thats a different story, unless the auto was made with 2 neutrals (which has been done), it would not be advisible to down shift it back.

I think we are on 2 different pages, I didnt clarify as per my car, vs the car you have which is auto.

Jan 10, 2009 | 09:39 AM

#24

382ssz28

11 Second Club

iTrader: (24)

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 638

Likes: 0

From: N Canto, Ohio

NANO!! No torches, bathtubs, heaters, blankets, or any other labor intensive, time consuming, INCONSISTANT ancient devises. The key to the NANO is, for ease of explanation, pressure controling pressure. It compresses the N20 gasses in the bottle back to a liquid as not to waste, and once purged to the desired pressure, it is absolutely consistant to the end. No muss, no fuss! $$ well spent.