Yeah I just tossed that out there as mentioned. I personally run around 1000 psi but thats me. Between 900-1000 and I am content. With HP Tuners, and a Wideband, my tunes have been pretty spot on A/F. Nano is definately the way to go but not manatory by no means.

 

IMHO I think the nano system will make the car/truck more consistant. That being said, once you tune it right it should stay that way. I understand nano is new technology but It makes a better N20 system. Just like we used to use points, or even distributers and carbs. Times change I should get a kick back from NANO lol

 

Well said

The NANO system is very consistent. Here is a dyno graph to prove it, bottle heater vs. NANO.

The first three are with nano .049 nitrous jet. After the first three runs was with a heater (.052 jet). We only show 2 runs because one of them didnt make it for some reason. The last run was motor. Notice there is no torque differences with NANO all three back to back runs. The very last run with the NANO it made 1 extra hp. Look at how with the stock system all the dips and spikes throughout the run. The NANO has a overlayed smooth curve. The NANO also made 20 more rwhp with a smaller nitrous jet.

This was on a bone stock 94 lincoln mark 8.

You be the judge.

 

Also if you look the heater was used on the car before the NANO. The stock run with no nitrous was the very first run on the car.

 

Also, here is an article done by gm high tech. There is some dyno graphs of with and without NANO.

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...mes/index.html

 

I second that... If your bottle pressure is low enough, youll actually slow down...

 

Well the NANO looks like a good kit, but Im not going to buy that right now. So thats out of the question.

I got a blanket in today and will be hooking it up tomorrow. Try some test runs and I'll let you all know how it feels. thanks