NX MAF housing VS fogger nozzle
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just bought a used NX gemini kit off a friend and im just curious if the MAF housing is really that much better than a nozzle...its the wet system and from what ive seen those NX MAF ends sell for a good amount of money...and i really dont want a MAF back on the car iether...
any thoughts on this??
if it helps i doubt me ever spraying over a 200 shot....
any thoughts on this??
if it helps i doubt me ever spraying over a 200 shot....
#4
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (49)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The MAF Gemini for me have a negative thing. The opening from were the motor breath is like a factory MAF and is like a bottle neck for high HP motor they can not breath very well with the MAF Gemini.
Now if you use a ported or bigger MAF with 2 fogger nozzels maybe is more efficient because you can use bigger intakes & TBs without the bottle neck .
Just my .02 cents.
#6
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Maf setup uses a shark nozzle outlet. So in a performance sense, its actually slightly worse than a nozzle as the nozzle does not have the 90* entrances to the housing. The housing ( for the smaller ls style maf) is two stage capable which is nice and is also a very clean install.
With a the Maf setups you are paying for fit and finish, and two stage capability over the single nozzle. No performance gains.
With a the Maf setups you are paying for fit and finish, and two stage capability over the single nozzle. No performance gains.