Wet or Dry; which do you find to be the better system and WHY??
I was curious about this since I've seen a dozen differrent posts on various forums contradicting the use of the other's system.
Anyone care to shed some technical light on this for me??
<img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
Anyone care to shed some technical light on this for me??
<img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
i like wet kits better. I would rather have the extra fuel coming from the fuel rail, instead of relying on the computer to add the extra fuel. Plus with a wet kit you dont need to upgrade your fuel injectors.
[quote]Originally posted by The Dragon:
<strong>I was curious about this since I've seen a dozen differrent posts on various forums contradicting the use of the other's system.
Anyone care to shed some technical light on this for me??
<img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0"> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Some body should just write something up on this. This question comes up all the time.
<strong>I was curious about this since I've seen a dozen differrent posts on various forums contradicting the use of the other's system.
Anyone care to shed some technical light on this for me??
<img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0"> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Some body should just write something up on this. This question comes up all the time.
[quote]Originally posted by stylin97:
<strong>i like wet kits better. I would rather have the extra fuel coming from the fuel rail, instead of relying on the computer to add the extra fuel. Plus with a wet kit you dont need to upgrade your fuel injectors.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I agree
<img src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" border="0">
<strong>i like wet kits better. I would rather have the extra fuel coming from the fuel rail, instead of relying on the computer to add the extra fuel. Plus with a wet kit you dont need to upgrade your fuel injectors.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I agree
<img src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" border="0">
all depends on your application.
I personally like WET kits (NX prefered, but i have no hands on expierence with TNT)
I have expierence with ZEX, NOS (dry) and NOS (wet) and Compucar in a bag setup.
All are good for adding a good bang for the buck. I like the wet as it adds fuel with the N20.
I personally like WET kits (NX prefered, but i have no hands on expierence with TNT)
I have expierence with ZEX, NOS (dry) and NOS (wet) and Compucar in a bag setup.
All are good for adding a good bang for the buck. I like the wet as it adds fuel with the N20.
IMO....and this is for the LS1 only. I have not seen a high rate of failure for either type that would lead me to believe one is worse than the other. For a smaller shot of 100 or less I like the dry kits. Mostly for simplicity. Anything over that, my current opinion is wet kits the way to go.
Thanks for the replies! <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">
I was just very curious because I see die-hard wet/dry guys defending and, in some instances, criticizing the other system.
I was just very curious because I see die-hard wet/dry guys defending and, in some instances, criticizing the other system.
Trending Topics
well, i had the TNT wet kit, and i loved it and never had a problem. now i'm going to try out the TNT dry kit and see how it works. i really have no preference as of yet. i'd really like the new NOS direct port injection. but that's not financially gonna happen. i like the idea of fuel being added by the fuel rails too. i'm a little scared of letting the MAF and computer do the work. BUT....a LOT of people have run the nos dry kit for years with no problems, so i guess it works. we will see....
Chris
Chris



