dyno numbers? heres the big question, is it better than the almighty TNT wet kit?

 

The install is a little easier if you ask me. I've never actually installed it but you don't have to trim the lid. I like the TNT kit much better but if you are a NX fan go for it. They make quality parts but the price of the TNT kit is a bit more. I really wouldn't do it unless you buy one set up for a dual stage. I didn't spend any more than that for my TNT direct port kit.

 

I think it KICKS A$$. I'll take one any day over a TNT kit. ANY DAY. Looks much better, easier to install, No air leaks...

<img src="http://www.flow-technics.com/customers/ryan/mafinstall2.jpg" alt=" - " />

And a 100 shot is actually a 100 RWHP.
<img src="http://www.flow-technics.com/customers/ryan/NAvsNX.jpg" alt=" - " />

Ryan K.

 

Looks pretty sweet!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

 

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Beeler311:
<strong>Looks pretty sweet!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I just got mine in the mail today.

 

In my post I meant the TNT kit is cheaper. The NX kit is definitely nice though <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> Just wanted to correct myself after I read my original post

 

anyone have a link for more info., or a part #? looks smooth <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> that "actual" 100h.p. sure helps a car go <img border="0" alt="[Firebird]" title="" src="graemlins/formula.gif" /> and anyone know the limitations h.p. wise off the top of their heads? thanks, Mark