Nitrous Oxide Installation | Tuning | Products
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Not picking up like it should

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2013, 09:07 PM
  #21  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Ls_Notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pittsburg, Kansas
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's the stage 6 plate and I'm just going off what nitrous express says on the jet size and fuel pressure. They recommend 8 on the low side for the fuel pressure, it's the lightning solenoids
Old 07-22-2013, 06:51 AM
  #22  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
Dynospeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you have never read the plugs I would take a step back to 150 and start reading the plugs. I'm sure you were rich on the 150 but now you are dead rich. Start taking notes of weather conditions so you know what to change in the future when the weather changes. Also take at least 4 more degrees out than you had while you are leaning it out.
Old 07-22-2013, 09:50 AM
  #23  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Nitro Dave's Nitrous Outlet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 12,284
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ls_Notch
Put the 250 jets In my nitrous express Gemini 2 plate and didn't quite work out how I was expecting. The car went 6.09@111 on the 150 shot and the best I could get out of the 250 was 6.10@114 with a little worse 60, 1.39 to the 1.37 before. Had 10 deg out on the 250 and 8 on the 150. The da was around 3400 last night but I figured it would still pick up with 100 more horse. I'm running a 4am feed line that came with the kit, could that be restricting me that much? Bottle pressure was good and full bottles. Something isn't adding up. It was very humid and couldn't see a timing mark on the strap but I was cautious to put too much back in with my stock bottom end. The car was running clean too and felt strong all the way through the traps, any ideas?
Due to the design of that plate jetting can seem a little screwy when you compare it to other set ups out there.

From my experience a 16 ft main feed line starts to show flow restriction around the 250 mark, so upgrading to a 6 an main feed line would be a good idea.

What is the compression ratio of your engine?
What fuel are you running?
What heads?

Did you happen to pull the plug at all?
Do you have a wideband on the car?
What do you call good bottle pressure?

Dave
Old 07-22-2013, 12:32 PM
  #24  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Ls_Notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pittsburg, Kansas
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a stock bottom end lq9 with prc stage 3 243s so prob 10.5-11 compression
Running 110 race gas

I checked all plugs none had timing marks on the band and they were somewhat fat

I do have a wideband but I have to get the software working to data log it since I just got a new lap top and don't have the install disk anymore

And bottle pressure was all right around 950
Old 07-22-2013, 02:04 PM
  #25  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ls_Notch
It's a stock bottom end lq9 with prc stage 3 243s so prob 10.5-11 compression
Running 110 race gas

I checked all plugs none had timing marks on the band and they were somewhat fat

I do have a wideband but I have to get the software working to data log it since I just got a new lap top and don't have the install disk anymore

And bottle pressure was all right around 950
I wouldn't worry about your timing right now but make sure you are pulling enough. You can add it back later.

Can you post up some pics of your plugs? That way we can look at them and get a better assessment of what's going on.
Old 07-22-2013, 08:14 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Ls_Notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pittsburg, Kansas
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't take any pics with them out and I put them back in to load the car so I doubt they would be off
Old 07-23-2013, 12:36 AM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Killer5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ms
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You probably have more than 10.5:1 compression. The lq9 is 10:1 stock with 72 cc heads and you have at least 64cc chambers now. Depending on what chamber cc is and head gasket it could be higher.
Old 07-23-2013, 05:36 PM
  #28  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Ls_Notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pittsburg, Kansas
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are non milled 64cc 243s and I'm using ls9 gaskets so you think I'm probably closer to 11 to 1?
Old 07-23-2013, 05:59 PM
  #29  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ls_Notch
They are non milled 64cc 243s and I'm using ls9 gaskets so you think I'm probably closer to 11 to 1?
With a zero deck and a flat top piston I come up with 10.94:1 compression so you might as well say 11:1



Quick Reply: Not picking up like it should



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 PM.