Timing retard using IAC?
Thanks for this information. I do run HPTuners pro and will try and find the info or if you could post up the volt to degree scaling. I never heard of the TCS method before and havent got a chance to look into it yet but I think thats the way I'm leaning now if its going to work. The first time I read about EFI Live being able to update the operating system to control timing for nitrous I was a little butt hurt. If the TCS works it would be the same thing in HPTuners making me feel a little better.
So can the experts weigh in on if there would be any issues with using this method for my car? Its a 98 with a relatively small shots (75-100) on a daily driven car.
Would a wideband be a good idea?
Do you have software to tune yourself? If you do you can make the tune change at the track and just change timing for the shot you run that won't cost anything.
Last edited by Whisper; Nov 8, 2016 at 03:29 PM.
As Nitrous Oulet pointed out you cant adjust the timing being pulled. This is true but it dont take to much out of the box thinking to set a couple resistors so you can target a couple different temps. Set up the different temps with different amounts of timing for differents shot sizes.
As for the TCS method. I opened up HPTuners tonight and under Engine/Torque Management/General/Retard vs RPM and Aggressive Retard vs RPM there is timing tables to adjust. I always assumed that fueling was tied in to but I havent found it yet. When I get a chance I'm going to test this to see how it works and if it messes with fueling at all.
http://redirect.viglink.com/?format=...stance%20Chart
As Nitrous Oulet pointed out you cant adjust the timing being pulled. This is true but it dont take to much out of the box thinking to set a couple resistors so you can target a couple different temps. Set up the different temps with different amounts of timing for differents shot sizes.
We don't use resistors. We use a 5-pin relay to completely disconnect the IAT signal. This way it functions 100% normal when not needed, and use the COLDEST column in the IAT spark correction table to adjust timing, a column that you won't see unless you are driving your nitrous car at 4 AM during a northern Canadian winter. The IAT will retain 100% functionality until the nitrous relay is activated. No resistor.
This gives you full control over how much timing is being pulled. You can adjust it however you want, up to -25 degrees.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
We don't use resistors. We use a 5-pin relay to completely disconnect the IAT signal. This way it functions 100% normal when not needed, and use the COLDEST column in the IAT spark correction table to adjust timing, a column that you won't see unless you are driving your nitrous car at 4 AM during a northern Canadian winter. The IAT will retain 100% functionality until the nitrous relay is activated. No resistor.
This gives you full control over how much timing is being pulled. You can adjust it however you want, up to -25 degrees.
Again this isnt my pic just an example. Do a search on this site even and see this has been done since around 2000-01. The best example of a IAT tricker is the Harris Speed Works timing interface. Through a series of resistors it targets 5-6 different temps all above normal opperating conditions. It targets higher temps because in the factory tune as temps go up more timing is commanded to be pulled.
Again this isnt my pic just an example. Do a search on this site even and see this has been done since around 2000-01. The best example of a IAT tricker is the Harris Speed Works timing interface. Through a series of resistors it targets 5-6 different temps all above normal opperating conditions. It targets higher temps because in the factory tune as temps go up more timing is commanded to be pulled.
The Harris Speed Works system can be simulated with a few relays, making it irrelevant as well.
Most people are paying for a tune, and in most cases they are not going to go right to the 150 jets. So if the IAT tricker is the method your going to be using why wouldnt you want one that targets 3 seperate temps. This way when tuner throws in the the 50 jets to start he can set 1 temp for it and as he goes to the 100's then the 150's they got there own temp to. A 150 or 200 shot is awesome at the track but with most cars not so good on the street. So even if you only target 2 temps you can roll around town on 50-100 shot then flip the switch change jets and have 150-200 for the track.
As far as the Harris interface for multi-stage timing, the same can be done with a few relays. You will use toggle switches to choose what size shot, and the appropriate resistor will be chosen. You don't get the fueling benefits, but for timing alone, we're talking $10.
As far as the Harris interface for multi-stage timing, the same can be done with a few relays. You will use toggle switches to choose what size shot, and the appropriate resistor will be chosen. You don't get the fueling benefits, but for timing alone, we're talking $10.
This was connected to the MAT (IAT) as described above.
This method WILL allow for a "range" of retard values if the EMS "look up table" is so set.
Thus with this potentiometer "dash mounted" the Spark Advance is easily changed.
Lance
This was connected to the MAT (IAT) as described above.
This method WILL allow for a "range" of retard values if the EMS "look up table" is so set.
Thus with this potentiometer "dash mounted" the Spark Advance is easily changed.
Lance
The biggest issue is finding one that works in the range you need.
I've used a large rotary switch before to control an entire relay panel of $5 timed relays and it worked fine. I was able to control boost by time on the stock ECU. I've since figured out boost by gear. The only one that likely isn't possible is boost by speed. You can do almost anything if you're clever enough with wiring, something I've only recently picked up.





