Anyone with dedicated fuel system in the rear?
Anyone with dedicated fuel system in the rear? anyone have their dedicated fuel system for a direct port in the rear of the car? just a general question as i'm undecided on which way to do it. Figured it's "better" to have it up front, but just want to know all my options.
Chris
Chris
Upfront is:
Lighter - Less Line and Fittings
Cheaper - Less Line
Easier - less line and wire to run, also to be NHRA legal you have to have a bulkhead is you have it mounted in the truck, easier to fill if you have it in the rear and you spill some gas your car will smell for days
Lighter - Less Line and Fittings
Cheaper - Less Line
Easier - less line and wire to run, also to be NHRA legal you have to have a bulkhead is you have it mounted in the truck, easier to fill if you have it in the rear and you spill some gas your car will smell for days
SSU Moderator
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Mike (the "Cement Shoe Director") has his in the back I believe.
In the rear is:
Lighter up front (better weight dist.)
Better because you can keep more fuel in the cell
Less engine bay clutter
Wolfe makes a bulkhead.
In the rear is:
Lighter up front (better weight dist.)
Better because you can keep more fuel in the cell
Less engine bay clutter
Wolfe makes a bulkhead.
i saw that along with the Billingsley setup that holds the bottle, battery, and fuel cell. figured that would work because in eed to mount the battery in the rear anyways. any other thoughts.
Chris
Chris
