and what is your 60'?

 

yep...bs....

my ta ran a 6.8 @ 104 for a 10.6 1/4 mile at 132 with a 1.55 60 foot in a 3600 lb car.


if it only ran 99, then that bastard was laying over real bad on the top end.

 

Where is that missing 7 mph? Or that 1.3 60 foot?

 

6.79@102 in the s-10 somethin is not right here.

 

I bet he has a short track. 1.57 60' 6.9@101 here. If he ran a 6.44@99 he had to pull like a 1.3x 60.

 

if u ran a 6.44 at 99mph, you are either retarded or the the track screwed up the timing or you let off at the end of the track

 

LoL, hahaha

 

how do you post a time slip pic from a digital camera?

 

Open the post box, then scroll down to where it says Attach files, click on Manage attachments, browse your computer for the pic, hit upload button and submit reply.

 

it seems wrong to me , my car 1.6's 60 fts and the best time ive got recorded was
60 ft .... 1.61
1/8 ..... 7.57 i think my mph was something like 92mph
(i'd have to look up the mph for sure)
1/4 ..... 11.98 @ 110mph
so my mph is way down from what it should be but it is an lt1 not ls1

my buddy run's constant low 1.5's 60 ft in his heads/cam dope (tnt) ls1 and 6.60-6.50's all day but at 107 mph , his car also weights w/ him in it 3660 ...

 

Someone could have mopped his goofy ***...I do it all the time to folks. What was the reaction time on that pass? Anything unusual for you? LOL

mike

 

reaction time has nothing to do with your e/t time

 

my friends ride did a 6.626 1/8 @ 107.10 10.28 with a 1.560 60' something is funny about thoes times!!!

 

looks bout right what do you see wrong with it?

 

Where do you guys get that smiley with the NX system purging from?

I want one!

 

5.90@119 with a 1.31 60ft tripping the 60ft marker with the rear tires. (1.27 60ft was the best with the front tires)

You should be around 107/110mph with that ET. Are you sure it wasn't a 7.44@99 because that sounds more like it. That is about what a 3500lb cam only car with alittle bottle and no suspension shoud run IMO.

 

6.44 @99mph

 

Gpowie this is no BS. Time-slip pic can be seen at Drag Racing Results posted by Eric with NEXT. She spun 30` out and ran a 1.65 60` 5.99 @ 594` 6.44 1/8 ET. New times coming shortly with better track prep and weather.

 

Dude, I do this all the time. I work at a track. The longer a person holds the mop in the staging beams the further you get down track before a reaction time has posted. Once another beam is tripped down track is when the clocks start. When I take the mop out of the 1st beam then the reaction time is posted. So yes, in this case his reaction would matter if he was truly mopped. Thanks for playing though!

Mike

 

The numbers arent adding up...Your track must have had something fly across and trip a finish line beam. Go run again and It will be a slower pass for sure.

The car should be in the low 4.xxx at the 330 ft marker. Much less running that time with a 1.65 60 foot. Ill throw the BS flag way up in the air for you buddy! Go blow smoke up someone elses *** I dont know any track that measures at the 594 ft marker...Its 60ft, 330ft, and 660ft...IE 1/8 mile. You sure they didnt give you a motorcycle timeslip instead of yours....LOL Then the cycle would have let off at the end of the track or missed a gear and coasted.

Mike