Dry to Wet????? Help!!!!
i want to get it tuned but now im told that my dry kit basically sucks. that i should go wet. i want to only spray a 125 shot. do i really need a wet kit? i do want safety but i just spent all this money and dont have anymore lol
Robert
Matt
If you had the G5 X3 tuned how much advance did they put in? The only problem i've seen is the advance put into tunes. That controls the surging
but wreaks havoc on spray. If you know your tuning more info is helpful.
The only reason i bring it up is most people don't think about this.
Hawk
Trending Topics
Matt
can i just get it tuned for the cam and get the 30 lb injectors. and then just spray like a 75-100 instead of the 125 shot without a tune? i just dont want to screw anything up.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
It's really your call, if you want to go with a wet kit then by all means do so, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with the combo that you already own.
Matt
can i just get it tuned for the cam and get the 30 lb injectors. and then just spray like a 75-100 instead of the 125 shot without a tune? i just dont want to screw anything up.
can i just get it tuned for the cam and get the 30 lb injectors. and then just spray like a 75-100 instead of the 125 shot without a tune? i just dont want to screw anything up.
Robert
I think that something like 36s would be more idea for your set up but since you already have 42 stick with them.
Dave
funny!
You should find another shop and get tuned properly for the 42 lb injectors.
Your dry system will work fine and will not need a different tune for the nitrous.
MPFI intakes are not designed to flow fuel! Wet kits are the number one cause for intake backfires.
The key to making power is to create a denser charge. That is why dry kits make more power than wet or direct port.
MPFI intakes are not designed to flow fuel! Wet kits are the number one cause for intake backfires.
The key to making power is to create a denser charge. That is why dry kits make more power than wet or direct port.
Vinny
MPFI intakes are not designed to flow fuel! Wet kits are the number one cause for intake backfires.
The key to making power is to create a denser charge. That is why dry kits make more power than wet or direct port.
As far as efficiency goes for turning X-amount of N2O into Y-amount of power,
the direct port is the bottom of the barrel since it gives the least benefit to the intake manifold tuning.
With smaller shots, a wet system can increase density in the manifold more than a dry shot, due simply to the percentage of N2O compared to ambient air going into the intake, and the added cooling & mass of the extra fuel.
A larger dry N2O shot would easily outpower a wet system due simply to the fact that evaporating N2O absorbs tons more heat energy than evaporating fuel. Trying to jet a wet system up to a very high level would be disasterous and probably launch the intake manifold into orbit.
If we're not talking efficiency, but all out power, then the direct port is king, followed by the dry system, and then the wet system. Pretty much the only reason a direct port comes out on top at the higher power levels is because of better distribution.
See when you say 'outperform' it could mean more than one thing.
the wet vs dry debate 
Then you have the fact that one solenoid & nossle/jet will have less pressure drop (in the line) than 8 of em. Dry shots hit harder for that reason combined with a denser charge.
Judging by demeanor, I don't think there is no convincing ya'll. So instead of debating me, save it. You guys are right, I'm wrong. I mean ****, with a name like nitrous dave..he must know EVERYTHING
Last edited by KVU; Jan 26, 2006 at 12:28 PM.

