DynotuneN2O

iTrader: (13)

Thanks to all who have purchased our Dynotune Gauges and Innovate Wideband products!

Dean

1MEANGTO

This was the talk of the track all weekend!

transamfreak01

iTrader: (8)

yup going to be ordering my very soon

TT632

iTrader: (3)

Is this a one or two channel O2 set up.

Robert56

iTrader: (2)

Yep, that's why I have been running the LM1 for a couple years, the best stuff out there.
Robert

BriancWS6

iTrader: (18)

Well, I have a PLX wideband in my car. I don't think it's the model in this test, but, mine stated the accuracy is suppose to be +/- .1 AFR. And, when compared to the dyno a/f readings, it is. No complaints here

smoknta

Just curious to who came up with these results? The PLX is advertised with an accuaracy of +/- 0.1 AF not +/- 1 AF.

Noyzee

iTrader: (37)

i put in my lc-1, and it seemed to work great!!
Dyno tune gauge looks MINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hennytime

iTrader: (33)

nice review, ive got the aem in the car and so far so good

DynotuneN2O

iTrader: (13)

Unfortunatly advertising and actual are many times 2 different things as I am sure we have all experienced. We are a dealer for Innovate and PLX but concentrate on the Innovate as we typically sell 100 Innovates for every one PLX. I also liked the confirmation that the Innovate had the fastest reponse time and accuracy which we feel is key to the success of their products. Here is the source of the results, and the positive thing about the testing was it was not conducted by any of the wideband companies.:
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2...tout/index.php

Dean

smoknta

Hey thanks for posting that article. I was just curious where the results came from. That will help me decide which to buy. And now that I know you are a dealer, I might be coming your way. Thanks agian.

stealth71

iTrader: (15)

Testing doesn't look 100% accurate.