1st Dyno #s for the F1
11-17-2008, 07:22 PM
#22
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Mike!
Looking at some more data I realised something interesting. Just about where the boost leveled off on the dyno is where the tires quit spinning on the street (~100mph). Coincidence?
Anyway, here is a chart that shows the tune looks to be pretty close. Good job Ellis!
Looking at some more data I realised something interesting. Just about where the boost leveled off on the dyno is where the tires quit spinning on the street (~100mph). Coincidence?
Anyway, here is a chart that shows the tune looks to be pretty close. Good job Ellis!
So you going to put a $750hp sticker on your hood too?
11-19-2008, 10:19 AM
#26
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- Transbrakes
- Past Champion
- Roll Bars
- 11.99 or faster
- DOT Competition Tires
11-19-2008, 06:57 PM
#30
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So are these requirements to be able to run Pro or will it be if you have say a transbrake or were a past champ you can only run in pro?
11-19-2008, 07:22 PM
#31
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We were thinking that some or all of these things would require you to run in Pro. You still could choose to run in Pro if you wanted to.
It's designed to be a way to attract more beginners to the other class. We've had lots of feedback over the years about "race cars" in CCC and how people were intimidated by them. This may solve that.
If you're interested, the next meeting is going to me in Bellevue on the 30th. See The CCC website for details.
11-19-2008, 09:38 PM
#32
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First let me say.. NOTHING is decided for sure. Our first meeting for 2009 is on the November 30th. This is just stuff we are talking about. We still have lots of details to work out and this is just a bunch of ideas.
We were thinking that some or all of these things would require you to run in Pro. You still could choose to run in Pro if you wanted to.
It's designed to be a way to attract more beginners to the other class. We've had lots of feedback over the years about "race cars" in CCC and how people were intimidated by them. This may solve that.
If you're interested, the next meeting is going to me in Bellevue on the 30th. See The CCC website for details.
We were thinking that some or all of these things would require you to run in Pro. You still could choose to run in Pro if you wanted to.
It's designed to be a way to attract more beginners to the other class. We've had lots of feedback over the years about "race cars" in CCC and how people were intimidated by them. This may solve that.
If you're interested, the next meeting is going to me in Bellevue on the 30th. See The CCC website for details.
11-20-2008, 07:18 AM
#34
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for clarifying Don. I wish I wasn't going to be flying to NYC on the 30th. I guess I can give you my input now.
I like the idea of a Pro class for CCC. It relieves some of the issues people have with the fast cars. I'm thinkin we'll need to limit the ET to something like 8.50 to 12.0? And most certainly all NHRA rules for those times will apply (fire suit, cage, chute, certs, whatever....).
Maybe we could call it the Renegade Class? Seems more fitting than Pro for some of us.
I like the idea of a Pro class for CCC. It relieves some of the issues people have with the fast cars. I'm thinkin we'll need to limit the ET to something like 8.50 to 12.0? And most certainly all NHRA rules for those times will apply (fire suit, cage, chute, certs, whatever....).
Maybe we could call it the Renegade Class? Seems more fitting than Pro for some of us.
11-20-2008, 06:18 PM
#35
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Snohomish
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I finally got the car on the rollers today. The new setup made 702hp & 633tq SAE. While it certainly isn't where I want to be, you gotta start somewhere. More than the 618 the old blower made, but well shy of my 800 hp goal.
As you can see on the dyno sheet, it's obviously got a problem around 5700 rpm. The boost leveled off there at 13-15 psi. Not sure if I have a leak somewhere or if the belt is slipping. But the A/F & fuel pressure is good, tho I might need a bigger meth jet.
Anyway, aafter a few tweaks here & there & Santas Sleigh should be back in the hunt.
As you can see on the dyno sheet, it's obviously got a problem around 5700 rpm. The boost leveled off there at 13-15 psi. Not sure if I have a leak somewhere or if the belt is slipping. But the A/F & fuel pressure is good, tho I might need a bigger meth jet.
Anyway, aafter a few tweaks here & there & Santas Sleigh should be back in the hunt.
Seriously, it is good news that you are making great progress.
11-21-2008, 12:07 AM
#36
All right, I'm home and off of Dial up...
You really need to convert over to three bar tune. I say this because you can't see what is going on under boost. You can't track your boost levels and you data log is almost useless.
Looking at your HP tuners log, your MPH graph is pretty linear which means that you are not getting wheel spin.
You definatly have something going on as your power should continue climb with RPM. If you could see what boost was doing that would help the diagnosis.
Ryan
You really need to convert over to three bar tune. I say this because you can't see what is going on under boost. You can't track your boost levels and you data log is almost useless.
Looking at your HP tuners log, your MPH graph is pretty linear which means that you are not getting wheel spin.
You definatly have something going on as your power should continue climb with RPM. If you could see what boost was doing that would help the diagnosis.
Ryan
