Northwest Members WA, OR, ID, MT, WY, SD, ND

Gonna dyno it today...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2005 | 11:45 AM
  #21  
Tranzor's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 1
From: Kent WA
Default

If I could get those types of numbers from mine I'd be a happy camper... But between my gears (switching to 4.30s), 12 bolt, and a denny driveshaft, there's probably going to be quite a bit of parasitic loss next time I get it on the dyno... I'll be happy if the net result is in the 380 rwhp range.
Old 01-06-2005 | 01:13 PM
  #22  
WAHUSKER's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, WA
Default

Are you still running the stock injectors? If so, I wonder if you are running out of inj at ~ 4000rpm? My TQ & HP really starts to climb at that point....or maybe it's the restriction of the stock lid.
Old 01-06-2005 | 01:31 PM
  #23  
Silverhawk_02TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by WAHUSKER
Are you still running the stock injectors? If so, I wonder if you are running out of inj at ~ 4000rpm? My TQ & HP really starts to climb at that point....or maybe it's the restriction of the stock lid.
Yes, still stock injectors. I'm sure I'm giving up a considerable amount with the stock lid. I think I'll have Jason e-mail me my stock tune when I get HPT, and start from scratch and try to do a decent SD tune. I've been lurking around the forums at HPT's website, and found that awesome step-by-step sticky. I never liked that MAF monkey business anyway. Once I get that nailed down, hopefully my numbers and A/F will look more like I think they should.
Old 01-06-2005 | 01:47 PM
  #24  
Ryan K's Avatar
Pathological Modifier
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,626
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by WAHUSKER
Are you still running the stock injectors? If so, I wonder if you are running out of inj at ~ 4000rpm? My TQ & HP really starts to climb at that point....or maybe it's the restriction of the stock lid.

Well since the car is going rich at 4000 rpm I'd say he's not running out of injector.
Old 01-06-2005 | 01:55 PM
  #25  
Ryan K's Avatar
Pathological Modifier
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,626
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Silverhawk_02TA
Don't believe the graph from the WinPEP program I downloaded. Those are the SAE numbers. The uncorrected numbers are 395.1/364.9 . If I followed everything Jason was tweaking when he did my tune, all he fooled with was really some idle, hot start stuff, and codes of course. Basically just driveability stuff. Didn't fool around with fuel or spark or anything. Besides that, it's one of his earlier tunes for his 231/237. We didn't do any logging or tuning to tailor it for my cam, since he wasn't able to make it over the last weekend I was up there. So, I'm sure there's plenty of power left to be found in the tune. That and I really need a lid! It's a fair bit off of the 417/402 dyno posted by TSP, especially in the TQ department. However, I did find one other 3rd party dyno besides mine, which was 390/370, which is actually really close to what I'm putting out now.

I'm running the stock 3.42's.

Here's the weather data from the run:

Absolute barometric pressure: 30.17 in.Hg.
Vapor pressure: 0.22 in.Hg.
Intake air temperature: 68.9 F

Oh and here's a scan of the uncorrected dyno run:
Ok, where to start, First I want to say thats a nice setup and I am not bashing you, just pointing out some places where you've made a mistake.

1. "Those are the SAE numbers" No they are not, they are the uncorrected numbers, the numbers on the second graph are STD correction which reads higher than uncorrected most of the time.

2. "The uncorrected numbers are 395.1/364.9" No, thats the STD corrected numbers and its not even that on the HP, Win Pep always screws up the little point when you let off the gas, note the big up spike at the end? thats a smoothing factor problem. With out the spike the max is actually around 385 rwhp. again thats STD the uncorrected would be lower and the SAE would probly be around 380 with your conditions.

If you use the conditions you listed above, your correction factor is .963 based on this calculator: http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_cf.htm

So, if you take your graph of uncorrected (winpep, without the spike) you are at 377 peak rwhp.

Ryan K.

Last edited by Ryan K; 01-06-2005 at 02:05 PM.
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:20 PM
  #26  
WAHUSKER's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,448
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan K
Well since the car is going rich at 4000 rpm I'd say he's not running out of injector.
Duh, I guess I shoulda looked again at the A/F graph....sorry.
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:51 PM
  #27  
Silverhawk_02TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan K
Ok, where to start, First I want to say thats a nice setup and I am not bashing you, just pointing out some places where you've made a mistake.

1. "Those are the SAE numbers" No they are not, they are the uncorrected numbers, the numbers on the second graph are STD correction which reads higher than uncorrected most of the time.

2. "The uncorrected numbers are 395.1/364.9" No, thats the STD corrected numbers and its not even that on the HP, Win Pep always screws up the little point when you let off the gas, note the big up spike at the end? thats a smoothing factor problem. With out the spike the max is actually around 385 rwhp. again thats STD the uncorrected would be lower and the SAE would probly be around 380 with your conditions.

Ryan K.
You are of course quite correct. Those are the STD numbers, and I previously amended my post in the Dyno forum about this, but forgot to do so here. According to the rest of the printouts I got, the STD numbers are .99 of the uncorrected numbers, making uncorrected HP/TQ 399/369 (approx.). Applying the weather data into the SAE equation nets a result of 383/354.

Yes, the spike at the end does indeed make the peak HP number somewhat inaccurate. However, when it hit the rev limiter (shown by the dip before the spike) HP was still climbing. If we assume a HP curve in line with what is shown on the graph, that would put HP at the RPM at which the spike occured at only slightly less than the spike itself, I would say in the neighborhood of about 1-2 HP. With each delineation of the graph equaling 5 HP, that would put the peak HP before hitting the limiter and the peak HP of the spike at a little less than 5 HP apart. Due to this, the actual SAE HP at that RPM would be approx. 382. Pretty good guess on your part!

Man, math sucks! It took me so long to track down equations and convert everything that my Subway sandwich is soggy now.

BTW- Don't blame me for claiming those first graphs were SAE, blame WinPEP 7, cause those are the numbers it spit out. The output graphs I exported all say CF: UNCORRECTED no matter what conversion factor I graph it under. Keep in mind, this is the same program that gives me different peak HP/TQ numbers every time I open my dyno runs, by between 5-10 HP/TQ! Go figure.

Don't worry, no bashing taken!
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:57 PM
  #28  
Silverhawk_02TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan K
If you use the conditions you listed above, your correction factor is .963 based on this calculator: http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_cf.htm
Damn! I wish I would have found that! I just found the equation and did the math. My math was good though, cause I did get the same CF, but I rounded it to .96.
Old 01-07-2005 | 04:39 AM
  #29  
sardog46's Avatar
10 Second Club
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 1
From: norfolk va
Default

don't worry bro when you get back back up here i will take care of all that stuff, hopefully 1.6 will be out and then it's mafless for you too. car runs so much better. Let me know when you get back in town, and we will tune you right up, mught have to do some dyno time, or borrow a wideband from someone, but hopefully will have access to a axle dyno real soon.



Quick Reply: Gonna dyno it today...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.