Dyno'd the SS...
#1
Dyno'd the SS...Graph Added
I'll post the graph after I get it scanned in the dyno section but I'm pretty damn pleased with the numbers. Especially considering its through Cats, a messed up I pipe and SLP Dual dual.
This is a Mustang dyno I have no idea what the equivelent dyno jet numbers would be, but it seems that Mustangs dyno less.
Did 470rwhp at 6400 I think and 423tq don't remember the RPM. It had 400rwtq at 3700rpm and didn't go under for a LONG time.
Still have some decel and low speed problems but the car is definately "crisper" on the throttle and easier to drive! Expect some crazy tuning questions soon though
The dyno was slightly better than a Stock C6 Z06. He had two baselines from different Z's and the torque you couldn't tell the difference on and the HP was a little higher 4-5hp throughout the band but very similar as well!!!
Bobby
This is a Mustang dyno I have no idea what the equivelent dyno jet numbers would be, but it seems that Mustangs dyno less.
Did 470rwhp at 6400 I think and 423tq don't remember the RPM. It had 400rwtq at 3700rpm and didn't go under for a LONG time.
Still have some decel and low speed problems but the car is definately "crisper" on the throttle and easier to drive! Expect some crazy tuning questions soon though
The dyno was slightly better than a Stock C6 Z06. He had two baselines from different Z's and the torque you couldn't tell the difference on and the HP was a little higher 4-5hp throughout the band but very similar as well!!!
Bobby
Last edited by 93TAWicked1; 10-18-2006 at 07:42 PM.
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
I have to say Bobby... those are some damn exciting numbers. I recall what the MTI stage 3 LS6 heads made on their Dynojet, and I am now positive that those TEA stage 3 LQ9 heads are *tha F^&(ing BOMB* (to the tune of around 50rwhp). It sure felt good on the street, so my hopes were up...
But thats on 92 octane, on a Mustang, with that "little" old school MTI Z1 cam, with cats on and a 9-inch.
Thats f&*(ing stellar. Plain and simple.
I will never race you again.
But thats on 92 octane, on a Mustang, with that "little" old school MTI Z1 cam, with cats on and a 9-inch.
Thats f&*(ing stellar. Plain and simple.
I will never race you again.
#5
Originally Posted by Visceral
I have to say Bobby... those are some damn exciting numbers. I recall what the MTI stage 3 LS6 heads made on their Dynojet, and I am now positive that those TEA stage 3 LQ9 heads are *tha F^&(ing BOMB* (to the tune of around 50rwhp). It sure felt good on the street, so my hopes were up...
But thats on 92 octane, on a Mustang, with that "little" old school MTI Z1 cam, with cats on and a 9-inch.
Thats f&*(ing stellar. Plain and simple.
I will never race you again.
But thats on 92 octane, on a Mustang, with that "little" old school MTI Z1 cam, with cats on and a 9-inch.
Thats f&*(ing stellar. Plain and simple.
I will never race you again.
#7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by 00Vette
Damn fine numbers dude!!! You need to add a 150hp shot of nitrous and you you've got a 10 second car................NO DOUBT.
Anyone else SHOULD be able ot run low low LOW 11s, or a 10 with the car as it sits with some Big-n-littles.
470rwhp ... 10.9 @ 127 doesnt sound impossible
Trending Topics
#8
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by Visceral
Bobby has sort of a "reputation".
Anyone else SHOULD be able ot run low low LOW 11s, or a 10 with the car as it sits with some Big-n-littles.
470rwhp ... 10.9 @ 127 doesnt sound impossible
Anyone else SHOULD be able ot run low low LOW 11s, or a 10 with the car as it sits with some Big-n-littles.
470rwhp ... 10.9 @ 127 doesnt sound impossible
#11
I think there is more on the table with the tune but right now it is a nice AFR very safe and conservative. The reason it was so rich was the overheat cats protection was causing it to go into open loop while cruising. So the good news is my 8-9mpg should go up to something a little more tolarable and I have more power