Lowest Trans Am in the World - Radical Thinkers Only!!
#21
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ewing NJ
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hope you radical thinkers are 5'6 and shorter it looks cool but I can't relate to the chop since I need all the head room I can get. Also will the seats need to be lower to the floor as well.
#22
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually, the hardest thing to squeeze in the car is the engine itself. I will move it and the K-member up 2". That's about all the room you have without converting to a dry sump and a small diameter flywheel/clutch assembly.
Last edited by JasonWW; 09-28-2008 at 05:38 PM.
#23
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Make sure you add longtubes also. lol. But seriously I believe it would have a lot more potential if you went with a front more similar to stock, doesn't have to be completely stock, but they did make the stock fronts how they are for a reason......because it flows well with the rest of the body. As all manufacturers do. A Ferrari has a badass front end because it matches the rest of the car, whereas in this situation it does not flow with the TA body style. Just A Thought!!! Good Luck!!
#24
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Make sure you add longtubes also. lol. But seriously I believe it would have a lot more potential if you went with a front more similar to stock, doesn't have to be completely stock, but they did make the stock fronts how they are for a reason......because it flows well with the rest of the body. As all manufacturers do. A Ferrari has a badass front end because it matches the rest of the car, whereas in this situation it does not flow with the TA body style. Just A Thought!!! Good Luck!!
I need to swap the front end due to converting the car to a front breather, plus I don't like how tall the stock nose is along the bottom edge.
#26
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Check my sig for some ideas that were good enough to actually do.
This project is actually a culmination of several smaller ideas. Without them, this project would not be possible. Things such as converting to a short spindle is what will keep the spindles from poking up through the hood. Converting to a solid frame and adding the independant rear suspension also makes this radical lowering possible. The choptop is a project I already explored in much detail and figured out that it's possible to do.
Last edited by JasonWW; 09-28-2008 at 07:01 PM.
#27
On The Tree
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think it looks good. Have you thought about the headlights that are fixed in place and don't open, I forget what they are called, or grafting some c6 headlights instead.
Also did you get your front end idea from this car or do you just think alot like them.
Also did you get your front end idea from this car or do you just think alot like them.
![](http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e128/John01WS6/2190077_175.jpg)
#29
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can't remember if I thought about smoothing out the nose before or after I saw that car. That was like 4 years ago.
Uh, a long time. I figure at least a year or two. I'm going to build a seperate chassis and assuming I do finish it, I'll transfer all my good parts over to the new chassis.
#31
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
old skool is the best skool, this is classic old skool rod building, and i like the way you think, chopped top, sectioned body, absoulty love it, to bad my buddy isnt doing the air ride site no more he could have gave you an awesome deal
if you do compressor systems do air ride tech stuff, thats all i use, my olds uses air ride tech, bullet proof products
if you do compressor systems do air ride tech stuff, thats all i use, my olds uses air ride tech, bullet proof products
#32
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm trying to determine if the final product is worth the work.
I'm about 95% sure it can be done. The main issue is whether I can get the engine squeezed in there. Most super low cars mount the engine in the rear overwise it can be hard to see over. You almost never see a front engine car this low. Luckily the the LS1 is a pretty short engine. Does anyone have any advice on this? Maybe a shorter intake or maybe a C5 oil pan to squeek out a bit more room? Moving the engine back a little also comes to mind. I'll probably move the climate control gear into the back limo style.
I'm about 95% sure it can be done. The main issue is whether I can get the engine squeezed in there. Most super low cars mount the engine in the rear overwise it can be hard to see over. You almost never see a front engine car this low. Luckily the the LS1 is a pretty short engine. Does anyone have any advice on this? Maybe a shorter intake or maybe a C5 oil pan to squeek out a bit more room? Moving the engine back a little also comes to mind. I'll probably move the climate control gear into the back limo style.
#33
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
#34
Launching!
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: McChord AFB, WA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Motor plates will allow you to move the engine around in the bay more easily than using the k member with motor mounts. Go turbo! A fmic would look nice in that bumper and you can use truck manifolds and not have to worry about fitting the long tubes.
#36
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
The K-member has to go up along with the engine, no way around that.
My A/C condenser will look a lot like a FMIC.
No money for turbo.
![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)
Truck manifolds will not fit without loosing the A/C and relocating the alternator. I don't want to do either.
#37
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I forgot that the first pic was tilted to give it some rake. That's killing me on squeezing the engine into place.
Here is one with the car level and the wheel wells raised. I also smoothed out the roof.
Here is one with the car level and the wheel wells raised. I also smoothed out the roof.
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v335/JasonWW/99%20black%20TA%20new%20rims/IMG_2353superlowchoptopd.jpg)
Last edited by JasonWW; 09-29-2008 at 07:25 AM.
#38
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is a pic similar to the first one, but the car is more level and the wheel wells have been raised. This would be more accurate as to how it would actually be finished and be drivable. Do you guys think 3" of travel and clearance would be enough? This car would no longer be a daily driver plus I can still hit the switchs to lift it up another 3" for obstacles and steep drivaways.
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v335/JasonWW/99%20black%20TA%20new%20rims/IMG_2971x3.jpg)
Last edited by JasonWW; 09-29-2008 at 07:37 AM.