Lowest Trans Am in the World - Radical Thinkers Only!!
#81
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
I was considering moving the dash tag over, but I didn't want to mention that online.
I really don't want to do any body work other than raising the wheel openings. The roof will be reinforced fiberglass. I believe the front and side glass can be reused if they are simply cut down. The roof and the suspension are really two seperate projects. I'll probably do one, then the other.
Do you have some pics of your 84?
I really don't want to do any body work other than raising the wheel openings. The roof will be reinforced fiberglass. I believe the front and side glass can be reused if they are simply cut down. The roof and the suspension are really two seperate projects. I'll probably do one, then the other.
Do you have some pics of your 84?
if you go with this idea it will be totally worth the investment. I need to get back to my fathers house some time and dig around for some pics of my car. I miss that thing damn shame what happened to it tho...
i would keep the spoiler at stock height, gives it the wedge look...it took forever to find a shop in my area that would cut glass. most places wont guarantee any part of it. ive never seen the windshield out a 4th gen, i know that towards the top theres a black area. i wonder whats under there. If you are in need of some extra clearance to see out you may be able to cut out some of the steel in there and modify the headliner accordingly.
i dont know, my head is scrambled with ideas about this project. i sat out in my garage and stared at my poncho for awhile last night trying to answer some of my ideas and questions about this project. youve got me going a hundred miles an hour here
#82
TECH Fanatic
I was thinking about your project earlier today as well.... I also think a "donor" car would be the way to go. It will leave you car in tack and leave you the time to work on the build without being in a rush.
#83
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: somewhere that doesn't get snow
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
its actually a clear 1/10 scale RC car body (i dont have one, i just found that pic online)
can be purchased at link below for $40 (the ricer spoiler on there i think is one of 2 you can use, either that one or the stock one)
http://www.rc-tradingpost.com/hpi-po...clearbody.html
can be purchased at link below for $40 (the ricer spoiler on there i think is one of 2 you can use, either that one or the stock one)
http://www.rc-tradingpost.com/hpi-po...clearbody.html
#84
Anyway, I need those freakin folks to call me back. They act like they don't want to sell the car. Damn. I'm going to hound them.
#85
I'm not really sure how I want to treat the top edge of the windshield.
1. I can build a strong tube frame behind it and attach the roof to it and then just black the very top edge out.
2. Leave smooth glass there like some folks do. Just run the A-pillars and not connect them across the top.
I sure would hate to crack the windshied through chassis flex. Choice 1 adds a lot of safety. Hmmm, I don't really know right know.
Whatever donor car I get I think I'm going to build it like this. Strip it down and set the body on the concrete slab I have in my backyard. I think it's flat enough. Then I'm going to mark my cutoff line which is pretty much the bottom edge of the doors. I'll cross brace the door jams and the inner sheetmetal structure so it holds it's shape. Then cut out the floor and everything below the line. Then set the whole body right on the ground just like it will be when the suspension is dropped.
I'm going to build it as I go along. I'll find the best location for the frame rails, then build them and install them so they are on the ground as well. I want the entire bottom of the car flat (well, the cockpit area anyway). Then I'll start to add the flat floor.
Anyway, I got to get the donor car first.
I also figured out a way to build a pushrod front suspension that moves the shocks/springs inboard and places them in front of the engine. It's a cool design and allows me to lay them down at a 45* angle. Meaning I don't have to buy shorter shocks.
I drew this up last night. If there are any engineers following this thread, tell me what you think of the design. I still don't know what material to make the tubes from. I want to be sure they don't twist and act like torsion bars. Hmmm, maybe cut up an aluminum drivshaft? Maybe 1.5" solid steel rod? Thick wall chromoly tubing? I'll work that out later.
It will look kind of like this. Excuse the crudeness.
Last edited by JasonWW; 10-03-2008 at 09:22 AM.
#88
I've been looking at some other convertibles for top ideas. What I could do is build a faux convertible top. Instead of a solid fiberglass top that lifts off and has to be left at home, why not make a fiberglass top in say 4 sections and then cover it with padding and top material? The flexible material would act like hinges and let me fold the top down flat(er) so it can be stowed in the back. In order to make the roof sections nice and solid when up, I may have to attach some braces across the hinge areas. It would not be fast to put up or down, but it's better than getting stuck in a rainstorm with no top. Know what I mean?
Last edited by JasonWW; 10-04-2008 at 03:28 AM.
#89
Just to refresh my memory.
I'm considering swapping out my 19x10 front rims for some 18x10 ones. I'd still be able to fit the 14" rotors I want. Hmmm, just a thought. I think reducing the overall diameter will better help the car preportions as well as reduce the wheel well height a little.
Damn, the current front wheels just fill in the wheel wells perfectly. Maybe I should consider 20" rears and enlarge the well just slighty for the perfect fit.
I'm very picky about getting the overall look and stance just right.
Maybe keep the 19" rears and run a slightly taller tire? I think some 345/35/19 Viper rear tires along with a higher wheel well might do the trick.
I'm considering swapping out my 19x10 front rims for some 18x10 ones. I'd still be able to fit the 14" rotors I want. Hmmm, just a thought. I think reducing the overall diameter will better help the car preportions as well as reduce the wheel well height a little.
Damn, the current front wheels just fill in the wheel wells perfectly. Maybe I should consider 20" rears and enlarge the well just slighty for the perfect fit.
I'm very picky about getting the overall look and stance just right.
Maybe keep the 19" rears and run a slightly taller tire? I think some 345/35/19 Viper rear tires along with a higher wheel well might do the trick.
Last edited by JasonWW; 10-04-2008 at 04:28 AM.
#90
OK, I played around with a few different wheel size combo's to see what looked best.
First up is an 18" front and a 20" rear. These sizes do exist.
Next is a more radical 18" front and a 22" rear. It might be 23", but it's hard to say. I don't think these rims are available any bigger than a 20" so these don't exist.
Lastly is the current 19" 19" combo, but with a taller rear tire.
First up is an 18" front and a 20" rear. These sizes do exist.
Next is a more radical 18" front and a 22" rear. It might be 23", but it's hard to say. I don't think these rims are available any bigger than a 20" so these don't exist.
Lastly is the current 19" 19" combo, but with a taller rear tire.
#94
Launching!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you can go lower than that..
body drop, bags, chopped top, shave down the ground effects to flat. I expect lugs to tuck if people make claims like lowest in the world.
Heres a shot of my old caddy... (no photoshop )
more pics..
http://www.streetsourcemag.com/ViewO...Profileid=9778
body drop, bags, chopped top, shave down the ground effects to flat. I expect lugs to tuck if people make claims like lowest in the world.
Heres a shot of my old caddy... (no photoshop )
more pics..
http://www.streetsourcemag.com/ViewO...Profileid=9778
Last edited by Cts-Voodoo; 10-04-2008 at 03:19 PM.
#97
The engine is the real problem. If it was in the back I could go lower, but I still want to be comfortable and not be laying down like an F1 car, you know?
Tire size becomes an issue as well. With the top off it will seem even lower. I personally think I'm at the limit with my current design. Stand next to a yardstick and see how tall 35" is.
Last edited by JasonWW; 10-05-2008 at 07:06 AM.
#98
Launching!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
35" tall is low! Not even 3'!
The engine is the real problem. If it was in the back I could go lower, but I still want to be comfortable and not be laying down like an F1 car, you know?
Tire size becomes an issue as well. With the top off it will seem even lower. I personally think I'm at the limit with my current design. Stand next to a yardstick and see how tall 35" is.
The engine is the real problem. If it was in the back I could go lower, but I still want to be comfortable and not be laying down like an F1 car, you know?
Tire size becomes an issue as well. With the top off it will seem even lower. I personally think I'm at the limit with my current design. Stand next to a yardstick and see how tall 35" is.
I like the canteliever front suspension setup, in fact, you can actually mount them entirely flat if you need to provided the angle for the suspension link side is close to a vertical angle. The more the angle drops from vertical, the higher the spring rate will need to be, as well the shocks will decrease in effectiveness, etc.
#99
Dont get angry, I wasnt insulting. I was merely saying you can go lower if you wanna get really creative with a plasma cutter, sawzall and a welder. Heh and 35 inches is about 3 inches below my inseam.
I like the canteliever front suspension setup, in fact, you can actually mount them entirely flat if you need to provided the angle for the suspension link side is close to a vertical angle. The more the angle drops from vertical, the higher the spring rate will need to be, as well the shocks will decrease in effectiveness, etc.
I like the canteliever front suspension setup, in fact, you can actually mount them entirely flat if you need to provided the angle for the suspension link side is close to a vertical angle. The more the angle drops from vertical, the higher the spring rate will need to be, as well the shocks will decrease in effectiveness, etc.
I've always wanted to do a mid engine conversion, but the LS1 would have to mount horizontally to fit. I don't have the money for a tough manual unit. The impala and gran prix have 5.3 v8's powering the front wheels, but they are auto's only. Probably cost a small fortune as well.
Here is the limitation.
Anybody have a good side profile picture of a T56?
Last edited by JasonWW; 10-05-2008 at 03:38 PM.
#100
Launching!
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not mad, but I think I'm at the limit. I don't want to notch the windshield for the engine to stick up into.
I've always wanted to do a mid engine conversion, but the LS1 would have to mount horizontally to fit. I don't have the money for a tough manual unit. The impala and gran prix have 5.3 v8's powering the front wheels, but they are auto's only. Probably cost a small fortune as well.
Here is the limitation.
Anybody have a good side profile picture of a T56?
I've always wanted to do a mid engine conversion, but the LS1 would have to mount horizontally to fit. I don't have the money for a tough manual unit. The impala and gran prix have 5.3 v8's powering the front wheels, but they are auto's only. Probably cost a small fortune as well.
Here is the limitation.
Anybody have a good side profile picture of a T56?
Yeah forgot about the engine being pretty much the lowpoint of that things front end.. Well you could always fab a full sheetmetal oil pan for it and slap on a skid plate, but yeah I see where youre going as to level of work per inches gained. Of course with the chop if you lay the windshield back a bit when you do it, you might be able to retain most of the stock mounting... dont listen to me, youll be fabbing on that thing for months lol.