Cam Motion Camshaft Garage Sale (Feb 2017)
#21
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
#29
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
Hey guys. I cannot accept payment over the weekend. We open 8am central time on Monday. If you know what you want, be quick Monday morning. I have a ton of private messages for these cams. Don't miss it.
#31
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
A cam more like the Hydraulic Roller, 3 bolt, 227/236 112+3 .613”/.605” would be a better choice as long as you have a 2800-3500 converter.
#34
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I do have a couple of questions though:
As I understand things, the lash in effect reduces the duration and lift slightly. Would that make this cam perform similar to the LS 6 factory cam?
Again, as I understand things, the main benefit of the solid roller is high rpm stability. Are there other benefits that I am not aware of to justify going the solid route for this level of performance?
#35
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
I understand the need to adjust the valve lash.
I do have a couple of questions though:
As I understand things, the lash in effect reduces the duration and lift slightly. Would that make this cam perform similar to the LS 6 factory cam?
Again, as I understand things, the main benefit of the solid roller is high rpm stability. Are there other benefits that I am not aware of to justify going the solid route for this level of performance?
I do have a couple of questions though:
As I understand things, the lash in effect reduces the duration and lift slightly. Would that make this cam perform similar to the LS 6 factory cam?
Again, as I understand things, the main benefit of the solid roller is high rpm stability. Are there other benefits that I am not aware of to justify going the solid route for this level of performance?
Even at this small size, this LLR will outpower the LS6 camshaft in a 4.8-6.2 liter engine. In an application like this, I personally would not spend the money on the adjustable rockers needed to run an LLR. But if I already had the rockers, I might do it.