TB Idle hole for 346 vs. 388?
#1
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,766
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
TB Idle hole for 346 vs. 388?
it takes "X" size of a hole for a 346 with a TR224 to idle at 800RPM.....
if that same engine is replaced with a 388 all bore short block and the same TR224 is used, will the idle hole be the same ("X"), smaller ("X" - __), or larger ("X" + __)?
if that same engine is replaced with a 388 all bore short block and the same TR224 is used, will the idle hole be the same ("X"), smaller ("X" - __), or larger ("X" + __)?
#3
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,766
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
re-read what I wrote.....
I'm going to be pulling the motor and resleeving the block (Darton Wets) to make a 388 all bore. When the motor goes back in, it will have the same heads (have stg 3s) and will run the TR224 for a while (sleeper cam).
I want to know (just wondering) if the hole would need to be drilled to supply the larger CI at idle (would think so).
I'm going to be pulling the motor and resleeving the block (Darton Wets) to make a 388 all bore. When the motor goes back in, it will have the same heads (have stg 3s) and will run the TR224 for a while (sleeper cam).
I want to know (just wondering) if the hole would need to be drilled to supply the larger CI at idle (would think so).
#5
Originally Posted by NoGo
No, the hole will not need to be drilled.
If you already have cam tuning though, you will have to back down *slightly* on the IAC tables.
If you already have cam tuning though, you will have to back down *slightly* on the IAC tables.
The Man - is Back!
Seriously, I was beginning to wonder if everything was OK with you..figured family, work, business, FI....
Welcome back! I'm running late, for a Christmas dinner - I'll IM you later.
You da Man
joel