Ok so I have been having a problem with my car running rich, going through 2 sets of 02 sensors covered in carbon....was told to get some numbers and this is what I have ended up with using a scanner

Can someone help me decipher this ?
MIL: off
ABSLTPS(%): 0.0
RPM: 625-660
CALC LOAD: 4.3%
MAF(lb/m): 1.62-1.63
MAP(Hg): 13.6
COOLANT: 163
IAT: 106
IGN ADV: 10.5-16
STFTRM1(%) -27.3-- -28.1
LTFTRM1 (%) -10.9
STFTRM2 (%) -.8 - 0.0
LTFTRM2 (%) 14.1
FUELSYS1 CLSD
FUELSYS2 CLSD
02S11(V) 0.060-0.805
O2S21(V) 0.030-0.930
STFTRM21(%) 3.9-4.7
02S22(V) .445-.455
OBD2STAT CA

 

These are your fuel trims for Bank 1 and Bank 2. + fuel trims mean your computer is adding fuel to that side and - fuel trims means its taking away fuel

your fuel trims should be around + or - 5

It looks to me like Bank1(Drivers Side) is Rich and Bank 2 (Passenger Side) is Lean

 

ok whats the S and L on the front of those two ?
and does everything else look ok ?

 

Short Term Fuel Trims (S)
Long Term Fuel Trims (L)

You really need to log alot more data driving around to see if things are normal, I dont see anything obvious besides your Fueling is way out of whack.

 

Ok will do, had a friend tell me to check the fuel injector seals..... So I'm gonna start with that since too rainy to drive anywhere

 

well pulled the injectors, one o ring had a chunk missing... and the brown plastic piece was broken...dont know if that makes a difference... but gettings seals tomorrow, ill test the resistance as well....

 

all injectors tested with a 12.3-4 ohms.... I dont know what they should be but since they all read the same I assume they are good.... didnt get seals cause I got stuck at work.... but tomorrow Im leaving early

 

ok new seals in, still acting the same... while drivng the fuel trim numbers are opposites... with bank one being under 10 and bank 2 going to -30s... and staying there.... any suggestions before I just burn the car down and collect insurance money

 

i plugged them in as labeled but maybe a possibility? got the harness from techrods, with a recommendation and it was nicely done

 

geezus..... ok with doing this would each side read different ohms? or is it something different? and does anybody have a reference page for what ohm specs should be or anything?

 

gotcha... simple check would be to check the wires, its coded like factory so if the tan w/white stripe is in place where the tan should be and vice versa I can assume they are switched, if they match up as incorrect on the pinouts

 

sorry I only know basic electronic stuff... this is a whole new world.... and im not too familiar with much fuel injection stuff.. old school carb im able to do

 

I hope its that easy! thanks for helping too...

 

just got done checking them an they are wired correctly , is it possible to have a bad pcm ?

 

"02S22(V) .445-.455" ??? Looks to be a dead player.

 

I take it that is the second O2 sensor on pass. side it doesn't exist so it will be dead

 

well after a LOT of reading and whatnot, and going through the service manual, it seems as if its the PCM..... Im going to pick up another one and hopefully that will fix the problem... if not, im just gonna burn the car down and collect insurance money....

 

Good luck w/ that, I don't do insurance fraud so I'm outta here.

 

ha not serious in any way.... but at times I wish it were that easy.....

 

Ok took a shot in the dark, and one guy suggested to me to unplug the passenger side 02.... did that and it runs like a bat out of hell..... and the numbers seemed to have cleaned up some too... being off the throttle in gear rolling around 50-60 mph the bank one short term trim read 1.6% and the passenger read 0.0% stepping on it any would change the values from that to 7.0% on the driver side, and -1.6%.... and sitting at a stop just idling both banks on short term trim read 1.6%..... but it didnt bog anywhere on the quick 7 mile ride.... no rich running that I could tell.... any ideas ? should I unplug the driver side and try that too? like the computer was setup to run without the 02s... I think its closed loop or something ? I know you lose some efficiency but definately runs much much smoother...