How much timing advance on a turbo LS2?
-Andrew
I would take a shot in the dark and say 8*-10* max for a street tune wiht an air/air intercooler. Higher engine bay temps cause higher intake air temps (IAT's) and timing must be pulled with high IAT's. There is a table for this in the tune.
I would take a shot in the dark and say 8*-10* max for a street tune wiht an air/air intercooler. Higher engine bay temps cause higher intake air temps (IAT's) and timing must be pulled with high IAT's. There is a table for this in the tune.
I'll wait to get a few more answers and then I'll post up a specific timing advance number and see what you guys think of it. Thanks again!!
How do you guys feel about 22 degrees of timing advance on said turbo car? What do you feel about 22 degrees if it was making too much heat in the engine bay due to parts not being coated or wrapped? Would you call that a "safe" tune? What about once the heat issue was resolved? Would you push 22 degrees?
I know this might be hard to answer without seeing the car on the dyno yourself, but I was wondering if this number is just too far-fetched in anyone's opinion. Thanks again!!
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
How do you guys feel about 22 degrees of timing advance on said turbo car? What do you feel about 22 degrees if it was making too much heat in the engine bay due to parts not being coated or wrapped? Would you call that a "safe" tune? What about once the heat issue was resolved? Would you push 22 degrees?
I know this might be hard to answer without seeing the car on the dyno yourself, but I was wondering if this number is just too far-fetched in anyone's opinion. Thanks again!!
The person that tuned my car advised me that 22 degrees of timing is absolutely fine on my setup, and that it wouldn't be the cause of my engine blowing up, after I told him everything I've been through since his tune. With my lack of tuning knowledge, I have done some research over the past months to better-understand timing. I, personally, now totally understand why 22 degrees advance timing on a forced induction setup, with the a slightly upgraded fuel system but everything else stock, would cause detonation.
This is the second time that I've had blown ring lands, within under 1,000 miles since the tuner tuned my car. The only factory that I've found that can lead to detonation on my setup is too much timing. This is what others have determined as well. Just need to tell the tuner that I feel he owes me my money back, which is just short of $1,000 that I paid him to blow up my engine and screw up my shift-points to where my car wouldn't shift at WOT. That's all.
Thanks guys, you share the same opinion as several others (everyone) I've talked to about my situation. Somehow, my tuner thinks that everyone is wrong about 22 degrees being what kept causing my engine to blow. I just need to find a way to convince him that he's the one who's wrong.
I wonder if I can log some easy, short dyno pulls to show him how bad the car runs with this tune. My car still runs, just very poorly. Any ideas??
Thanks!
Last edited by MEAN GTO; Mar 23, 2013 at 07:11 PM.
The person that tuned my car advised me that 22 degrees of timing is absolutely fine on my setup, and that it wouldn't be the cause of my engine blowing up, after I told him everything I've been through since his tune. With my lack of tuning knowledge, I have done some research over the past months to better-understand timing. I, personally, now totally understand why 22 degrees advance timing on a forced induction setup, with the a slightly upgraded fuel system but everything else stock, would cause detonation.
This is the second time that I've had blown ring lands, within under 1,000 miles since the tuner tuned my car. The only factory that I've found that can lead to detonation on my setup is too much timing. This is what others have determined as well. Just need to tell the tuner that I feel he owes me my money back, which is just short of $1,000 that I paid him to blow up my engine and screw up my shift-points to where my car wouldn't shift at WOT. That's all.

So considering the way that the knock retard tables were modified in this tune (I think someone told me that the tuner set the KR values to pull less timing, and more "tolerance", if you will, before pulling that timing?) should have allowed for an early death to my engine, right? Thanks!
So considering the way that the knock retard tables were modified in this tune (I think someone told me that the tuner set the KR values to pull less timing, and more "tolerance", if you will, before pulling that timing?) should have allowed for an early death to my engine, right? Thanks!
In short, you're timing curves are a function of knock detected versus RPm/fuel. There is no cookie cutter option. It requires driving, scanning, adjusting...... and repeat.
As for me. I skipped the dyno and used street driving for the majority of the tuning. For WOT, I headed to the track and made a few runs. The point where I had the highest trap speed without knock was the optimal setting. With this method I killed two birds with one stone...... got a few passes in on a beautiful Saturday afternoon + dialed in my tune









