LS1 tuning 10* overlap on cam - any surge?
#21
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm getting quite a collection of injectors, I tried a set of modified injectors. In SD only the idle & off idle VE cells did not tune nicely at all & it ran poorly. I swapped in a set of ID 1000's & the VE cells dialed in much nicer immediately, I actually posted somewhere the difference in those tables.....major. Still not happy with how it ran regarding surge & buck, 17* of overlap, I swapped in a set of stock LS2 injectors for an experiment. The ID 1000's ran ever bit as good if not better than the LS2's in the low speed area. So ID 1000's injector's even @ low pulse width run & tune equal to or better than the stock injector's. No luck with modified injectors.
I removed them as I'm happy with my NA power, had consider FI was the reason for going with that size of injector. I still have them if you are interested they have 300 miles. Also at this point I had re cam to 10* over lap & reduced duration by several degree's
From there I went to LS9 injectors were the low speed issue's were aggravated further. Then to LS7 injectors which made a noticeable improvement in the low speed area, but they quickly run out of fuel.
I removed them as I'm happy with my NA power, had consider FI was the reason for going with that size of injector. I still have them if you are interested they have 300 miles. Also at this point I had re cam to 10* over lap & reduced duration by several degree's
From there I went to LS9 injectors were the low speed issue's were aggravated further. Then to LS7 injectors which made a noticeable improvement in the low speed area, but they quickly run out of fuel.
#22
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just want to clarify what I said before about my surging/bucking, that its very very minimal and in fact the more I thought about it my last drive, I think its mostly the play in my crappy rear diff. Just don't want to scare people away from big cams, its not bad at all. I daily drive mine all summer. I made a vid of my car cruising. I've been meaning to make a better one with my go pro but this gives you an idea.
The jingling noise is loose change in cup holder, other noise is my shitty rear that needs a rebuild.
I don't normally cruise that low rpm like that, its just for demonstration.
The jingling noise is loose change in cup holder, other noise is my shitty rear that needs a rebuild.
I don't normally cruise that low rpm like that, its just for demonstration.
#23
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just want to clarify what I said before about my surging/bucking, that its very very minimal and in fact the more I thought about it my last drive, I think its mostly the play in my crappy rear diff. Just don't want to scare people away from big cams, its not bad at all. I daily drive mine all summer. I made a vid of my car cruising. I've been meaning to make a better one with my go pro but this gives you an idea.
http://youtu.be/RAzcLxna8eA
The jingling noise is loose change in cup holder, other noise is my shitty rear that needs a rebuild.
I don't normally cruise that low rpm like that, its just for demonstration.
http://youtu.be/RAzcLxna8eA
The jingling noise is loose change in cup holder, other noise is my shitty rear that needs a rebuild.
I don't normally cruise that low rpm like that, its just for demonstration.
#24
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So, I want to bring this back up from the dead. I got light throttle surge cured by adding a ton of airflow to the Follower table.
However, when I lift off the gas, I buck under 1600 RPM (I have 16 degrees of overlap and need more gear). I've added airflow to the cracker tables, but it didn't seem to help.
Should I play with the VE tables/MAF transfer some more? I'm still a bit rich when I let off, but that's because when the TB snaps shut, airflow is killed. I need it to stay lean. Should I try adding a **** ton of airflow to the Cracker? I have a **** ton in the follower...
However, when I lift off the gas, I buck under 1600 RPM (I have 16 degrees of overlap and need more gear). I've added airflow to the cracker tables, but it didn't seem to help.
Should I play with the VE tables/MAF transfer some more? I'm still a bit rich when I let off, but that's because when the TB snaps shut, airflow is killed. I need it to stay lean. Should I try adding a **** ton of airflow to the Cracker? I have a **** ton in the follower...
#25
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I folded, my project goal was perfect manners without compromise in the tune. So I reduced the overlap with Martin's cam selection & re visited the entire valve train.
The end result is near perfect manners, no fiddling the tune, no drivers meeting, improved mid range power & no power loss in the top. The cam is easier on the valve.....
This is my third camshaft, 17* to 10.5 & now 4.5*, I've not lost power & now I'm making more.....guess what page I'm on
The end result is near perfect manners, no fiddling the tune, no drivers meeting, improved mid range power & no power loss in the top. The cam is easier on the valve.....
This is my third camshaft, 17* to 10.5 & now 4.5*, I've not lost power & now I'm making more.....guess what page I'm on
![Burnout](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_burnout.gif)
Last edited by ctd; 06-13-2015 at 12:51 PM.
#27
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I folded, my project goal was perfect manners without compromise in the tune. So I reduced the overlap with Martin's cam selection & re visited the entire valve train.
The end result is near perfect manners, no fiddling the tune, no drivers meeting, improved mid range power & no power loss in the top. The cam is easier on the valve.....
This is my third camshaft, 17* to 10.5 & now 4.5*, I've not lost power & now I'm making more.....guess what page I'm on![Burnout](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_burnout.gif)
The end result is near perfect manners, no fiddling the tune, no drivers meeting, improved mid range power & no power loss in the top. The cam is easier on the valve.....
This is my third camshaft, 17* to 10.5 & now 4.5*, I've not lost power & now I'm making more.....guess what page I'm on
![Burnout](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_burnout.gif)
Russ Kemp
#28
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So, I want to bring this back up from the dead. I got light throttle surge cured by adding a ton of airflow to the Follower table.
However, when I lift off the gas, I buck under 1600 RPM (I have 16 degrees of overlap and need more gear). I've added airflow to the cracker tables, but it didn't seem to help.
Should I play with the VE tables/MAF transfer some more? I'm still a bit rich when I let off, but that's because when the TB snaps shut, airflow is killed. I need it to stay lean. Should I try adding a **** ton of airflow to the Cracker? I have a **** ton in the follower...
However, when I lift off the gas, I buck under 1600 RPM (I have 16 degrees of overlap and need more gear). I've added airflow to the cracker tables, but it didn't seem to help.
Should I play with the VE tables/MAF transfer some more? I'm still a bit rich when I let off, but that's because when the TB snaps shut, airflow is killed. I need it to stay lean. Should I try adding a **** ton of airflow to the Cracker? I have a **** ton in the follower...
#29
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I should clarify my position & why decided to change out the cam. I was to the point were I have to agree with soundengineer. The problem is I was not prepared to start drilling my nice NW 102 TB. Not being a experienced pro tuner @ that level I would have been entirely on my own as I could not find anyone with experience willing to help.....including soundengineer.
Two broken valve springs had me in fear so I was going to have deal with that issue.
Two broken valve springs had me in fear so I was going to have deal with that issue.
#30
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Easiest way to tell if you need to drill is what IAC counts are required for a proper idle. Ideally you want between 40-70. Above 70 you'll probably want to drill. Below 40 you may have a leak.
When I first had everything installed with my 228r I have about 130 on the IAC. I started small and stepped up one bit at a time until I had the proper counts. It's important to make sure the blade is closed properly and you are getting 0% on the TPS.
When I first had everything installed with my 228r I have about 130 on the IAC. I started small and stepped up one bit at a time until I had the proper counts. It's important to make sure the blade is closed properly and you are getting 0% on the TPS.
#32
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not the same. DBW uses strictly blade angle to control idle air and drilling a hole can usually add more trouble than it helps. Proper sizing of the TB and quality construction are more important, in this case. I tend to go to the smaller side of TB sizing to gain better drivability when a car is a daily. Most people go too big, too soon.
#33
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I understand that & agree, just wanted to be sure the poster basing on IAC counts understood there are DBW's which do not have IAC counts. As well the drill the blade comments are not about idle control.
Also I agree with soundengineer that you might drill a throttle blade to add air somewhere off idle either cable or DBW. I think this is where Jake is at, my days of drilling blades are back with Carbs....no choice, that was for idle control & transition to off idle. Easy way for me was to re cam, that has been a win win for my situation. My skill level with HPT is not where it needs to be to dig out the number set
Also I agree with soundengineer that you might drill a throttle blade to add air somewhere off idle either cable or DBW. I think this is where Jake is at, my days of drilling blades are back with Carbs....no choice, that was for idle control & transition to off idle. Easy way for me was to re cam, that has been a win win for my situation. My skill level with HPT is not where it needs to be to dig out the number set
![Secret](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/secret2.gif)
#34
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I understand that & agree, just wanted to be sure the poster basing on IAC counts understood there are DBW's which do not have IAC counts. As well the drill the blade comments are not about idle control.
Also I agree with soundengineer that you might drill a throttle blade to add air somewhere off idle either cable or DBW. I think this is where Jake is at, my days of drilling blades are back with Carbs....no choice, that was for idle control & transition to off idle. Easy way for me was to re cam, that has been a win win for my situation. My skill level with HPT is not where it needs to be to dig out the number set![Secret](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/secret2.gif)
Also I agree with soundengineer that you might drill a throttle blade to add air somewhere off idle either cable or DBW. I think this is where Jake is at, my days of drilling blades are back with Carbs....no choice, that was for idle control & transition to off idle. Easy way for me was to re cam, that has been a win win for my situation. My skill level with HPT is not where it needs to be to dig out the number set
![Secret](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/secret2.gif)
#35
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I understand very well DBW vs DBC. I forgot to mention it. I've been DBC for so long due to the swap that I forget it exists sometimes. :-)
Drilling a TB in a DBC car is NOT a hack if the cam is big enough. Sometimes the IAC stepper motor is not capable of providing enough air for a bigger cam. You want to have the proper range of movement through all operating conditions. When the motor first starts the IAC opens way up. If the cam is too big for the TB as is you'll have issues due to insufficient air. Too big usually refers to a lot of overlap.
DBW drilling shouldn't be necessary.
Drilling a TB in a DBC car is NOT a hack if the cam is big enough. Sometimes the IAC stepper motor is not capable of providing enough air for a bigger cam. You want to have the proper range of movement through all operating conditions. When the motor first starts the IAC opens way up. If the cam is too big for the TB as is you'll have issues due to insufficient air. Too big usually refers to a lot of overlap.
DBW drilling shouldn't be necessary.
#37
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
But if you increase these tables to much, you will have a cruise control/hanging idle effect, and your car will still buck & surge. Cams with too much valve overlap buck & surge at light throttle/low RPM due to the exhaust that is pulled back into the cylinder during the intake stroke. Same as a car with a weak EGR valve spring.
And a 4000 rpm stall convertor will smooth out cams with a lot of valve overlap.
Russ Kemp
#38
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agreed 100%, you have to agree if the volume of air is changed @ a given point & AFR is correct the motor will run differently?
I have two examples in mind, the first being a air intake restriction @ WOT. The MAP sensor is verifying what is happening @ WOT, you correct the fuel for AFR & all is good. You remove the restriction & the AFR goes lean, you correct the fuel & bring the AFR back in line & you are probably & should be making more power. Both AFR's are correct, the motor runs differently.
The second is carb days, bigger cam & the motor is pissed off @ idle. I changed my low speed jets so I have proper range of the idle air/fuel needle screws. Drill a hole in the blade, the motor goes lean so I jet the low speed back up for proper range of the air/fuel needle screws. The motor is now very happy as it has more ilde air .....BRAF in todays speak.
Two opposite ends of the spectrum, my understanding is you can have a correct AFR in any condition. Not necessarily a happy motor.
I follow your comments regarding the cracker & follower, would it be reasonable to think that if you are adding excessive airflow to those tables you might be out of range of correct operation? Drilling the blade so the motor gets more air, only if it is happy
you can back down the cracker & follower tables working within a smaller window & their range of control?
I have two examples in mind, the first being a air intake restriction @ WOT. The MAP sensor is verifying what is happening @ WOT, you correct the fuel for AFR & all is good. You remove the restriction & the AFR goes lean, you correct the fuel & bring the AFR back in line & you are probably & should be making more power. Both AFR's are correct, the motor runs differently.
The second is carb days, bigger cam & the motor is pissed off @ idle. I changed my low speed jets so I have proper range of the idle air/fuel needle screws. Drill a hole in the blade, the motor goes lean so I jet the low speed back up for proper range of the air/fuel needle screws. The motor is now very happy as it has more ilde air .....BRAF in todays speak.
Two opposite ends of the spectrum, my understanding is you can have a correct AFR in any condition. Not necessarily a happy motor.
I follow your comments regarding the cracker & follower, would it be reasonable to think that if you are adding excessive airflow to those tables you might be out of range of correct operation? Drilling the blade so the motor gets more air, only if it is happy
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Last edited by ctd; 06-18-2015 at 06:52 AM.
#39
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have two examples in mind, the first being a air intake restriction @ WOT. The MAP sensor is verifying what is happening @ WOT, you correct the fuel for AFR & all is good. You remove the restriction & the AFR goes lean, you correct the fuel & bring the AFR back in line & you are probably & should be making more power. Both AFR's are correct, the motor runs differently.?
The second is carb days, bigger cam & the motor is pissed off @ idle. I changed my low speed jets so I have proper range of the idle air/fuel needle screws. Drill a hole in the blade, the motor goes lean so I jet the low speed back up for proper range of the air/fuel needle screws. The motor is now very happy as it has more ilde air .....BRAF in todays speak.?
I follow your comments regarding the cracker & follower, would it be reasonable to think that if you are adding excessive airflow to those tables you might be out of range of correct operation? Drilling the blade so the motor gets more air, only if it is happy
you can back down the cracker & follower tables working within a smaller window & their range of control?
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
And drilling a DBW throttle blade is a hack method from the LS Edit days before there was a scanner like Hp Tuners to see the STIT & LTIT values.
Russ Kemp
#40
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I actually drilled a small hole on my NW so I could close it down. My FAST 102 was barely open to have the right IAC counts. But I added a 1/8" hole to smooth out the airflow and to allow me to reduce the blade angle. That helped some. I think I probably could have taken a lathe to the blade to open it up. When it shut down completely, you couldn't see light around the blade like you could on the FAST.