Can we discuss lambda vs afr?

Direct from NGK. My autometer is identical also.
The AFX is compatible with fuels other than gasoline. The AFX’s display is designed to
show AFR values based on a gasoline scale with 14.57:1 AFR as the stoichiometric ratio.
The display will simply show AFR on a gasoline scale even though the fuel used may
have different properties (stoichiometry for methanol is approximately 6.5:1). As long as
you understand this, interpreting the values should be easy.
The same principle applies to other fuels such as ethanol, propane, CNG, LPG, etc. The
display will simply read on a gasoline scale.
Again this is very simple. Stoich (whatever it may be) IS 14.7 on the gauge when hit perfectly. Command 14.7, correct fueling tables to 14.7, and thats it.
https://www.hptuners.com/forum/showt...EQ)-Discussion
https://www.hptuners.com/forum/showt...EQ)-Discussion
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Maybe you could, NOT CHANGE YOUR AFR TO 9.7 WHILE TUNING. Oh **** whoop whoop whos da man????? 

( the PCM does have a pid for commanded EQR; multiplying this by wideband lambda (which can be easily calculated from wideaband voltage) gives the correction multiplier )
so it just reduces to a simple matter.
I too have a Horiba UEGO Meter used to calibrate my ECU-882 "look-up" tables.
YES again, I tune with Lambda @ .891-.903 as common with .781-.863 for SC engines in most cases.
My ECU-882 can specify the AFR number requested in the "units" table.
WE do many AFR's such as Meth, E-100, E-85, NG, Propane, etc.
MY CONCERN is for Cody's LM-2 as the Innovate method is to "toss" the UEGO Calibration Resistor.
I Invented the Four Wire EGO for NTK using my bench dyno, and TWO sensors in the same pipe at the same time. (one EGO three wire AND one UEGO semsor)
I added a ground wire to the body of the EGO (three wire now four wire) with the "read" better than the UEGO, much faster.
My method was to ADD a scope leed to the 0-1 volt output with witness of EACH Cylinders firing Lambda measurement better than the UEGO. (1980's)
The LM-1 was invented later and tested with the same test, one pipe with TWO sensors.
The "read" was MUCH different when the Horiba UEGO/Innovate UEGO were reported with the LM-1/2 read as a 12.00 AND proper read of the Horiba as 13.00 AFR.
This report was provided to NTK with the "repair" method of creating their OWN BRAND AFRM.
I tested one of the first, on my bench dyno finding the AFRM/Horiba as EQUAL in the AFR report.
I fit the NTK "hot start" sensors most often AND when used in an engine with normal operating conditions, they work VERY well with a cost of $ 65.00.
Lance
Lance












