Low Dyno number and trap speed for Build
#1
Low Dyno number and trap speed for Build
I posed this question on the Hptuners Forum and figured I would ask here too.
I am working on a friends car trying to save him some money. I have tuned a few gen 3 motors with good success. I had my mid sized cam, LS1 Trans AM trapping 120mph all motor.
My friends car is a 2005 CTS-V Manual with an iron block 6.0, it has the following mods
- BTR stage 2 cam
- Trickflow ported 220's
- Fast 92
- Ford Racing injectors (Red Tops)
- ARH Headers
- Stock Exhaust with no cats or mufflers
Static compression is 11.18:1 and dynamic is 8.7:1
I have the car running @ 12.5 - 12.8 AFR at WOT and the fuel trims are spot on. Total timing is @ 28*. Torque management is gone.
We did 4 pulls on the dyno and the first was 363hp @ 6400rpm, last was 404hp at 6500rpm with me only making a minor fueling adjustment and adding a little more spark. He just went to the track at trapped 110 mph and was slower than a LS6 beside him with a much smaller cam.
Only thing I can see is the dynamic airflow is low compared to other logs I have from similar vehicles. It tops out at 2554lb/hr during the 4th gear pull.
Wondering if anyone sees anything in the tune.
I am working on a friends car trying to save him some money. I have tuned a few gen 3 motors with good success. I had my mid sized cam, LS1 Trans AM trapping 120mph all motor.
My friends car is a 2005 CTS-V Manual with an iron block 6.0, it has the following mods
- BTR stage 2 cam
- Trickflow ported 220's
- Fast 92
- Ford Racing injectors (Red Tops)
- ARH Headers
- Stock Exhaust with no cats or mufflers
Static compression is 11.18:1 and dynamic is 8.7:1
I have the car running @ 12.5 - 12.8 AFR at WOT and the fuel trims are spot on. Total timing is @ 28*. Torque management is gone.
We did 4 pulls on the dyno and the first was 363hp @ 6400rpm, last was 404hp at 6500rpm with me only making a minor fueling adjustment and adding a little more spark. He just went to the track at trapped 110 mph and was slower than a LS6 beside him with a much smaller cam.
Only thing I can see is the dynamic airflow is low compared to other logs I have from similar vehicles. It tops out at 2554lb/hr during the 4th gear pull.
Wondering if anyone sees anything in the tune.
#4
i wouldnt be surprised if you made more power with less ignition timing. 28* is a lot IMHO. nonetheless, something is off if he is trapping 110. are all cylinders firing? put a temp gun to each primary.
Last edited by subeone; 04-16-2017 at 09:32 PM.
#6
FormerVendor
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by subeone;19594776[B
]i wouldnt be surprised if you made more power with less ignition timing. 28* is a lot IMHO. [/B]nonetheless, something is off if he is trapping 110. are all cylinders firing? put a temp gun to each primary.
#7
yep! have had similar experiences, especially with a DCR that high and SCR in the 11s and a somewhat heavy cts v car. More efficient heads needs less timing. You have TFS 220s, so i'd be inclined to believe you need less ignition timing. BUT it's not the reason you are missing 50-75 ponies or so.
Last edited by subeone; 04-17-2017 at 04:28 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
iTrader: (47)
Not just dot to dot, actually degreed in, with a degree wheel? Throwing timing in on a combo that is not mechanically correct, isn't going to work properly. I have nothing against the BTR/LJMS cams AT ALL, but I have not seen one ground accurately yet. I love my cam, and the same cam pushed Denmahs Colorado to almost 1000 rwhp off the juice, just saying I haven't seen one right yet is all, and it's certainly worth checking.
#9
Thanks for the replies all.
I am going to try taking a 4-5 degrees of timing out. I don't think it is the reason either that the build seems off 50-60 hp, but i'll give it a try.
As far as putting the degree wheel on. I was told the builder did do it. Of course the builder says there is nothing wrong with the build and it has to be the tune. But I think I would actually have to put quite a bit of effort in to sabotaging the tune to get it to be 60hp short....
After looking through a bunch of logs from other cars and from a few of mine, his dynamic airflow seems awfully low. So either the injector data is off (which I doubt as it is from Greg Banish's spreadsheet), or there is an air restriction, or a mechanical problem.
I am going to try taking a 4-5 degrees of timing out. I don't think it is the reason either that the build seems off 50-60 hp, but i'll give it a try.
As far as putting the degree wheel on. I was told the builder did do it. Of course the builder says there is nothing wrong with the build and it has to be the tune. But I think I would actually have to put quite a bit of effort in to sabotaging the tune to get it to be 60hp short....
After looking through a bunch of logs from other cars and from a few of mine, his dynamic airflow seems awfully low. So either the injector data is off (which I doubt as it is from Greg Banish's spreadsheet), or there is an air restriction, or a mechanical problem.
#12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
Where does power peak on the dyno? I.E. as expected or early? If early that would support the timing chain off a tooth. If the plugs look good and the tune is good, why not do a compression test? You said the dynamic airflow looks low, how much air is it consuming via the log? I don't have HPT on this PC.
#13
Where does power peak on the dyno? I.E. as expected or early? If early that would support the timing chain off a tooth. If the plugs look good and the tune is good, why not do a compression test? You said the dynamic airflow looks low, how much air is it consuming via the log? I don't have HPT on this PC.
Compression was 210 +/- 5 on all cylinders.
Dynamic peaked at 2500lb/hr on the pull which seems low.